Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 38.civil appeal nos.4534- 4535/1999 and connected (d.d. 2303.2006) : n. srinivasa rao vs. spl. court under a.p. land grabbing (prohibition) act, & others. 39.w.p.nos. 107303/2019 and connected matters (d.d. 25.06.2019) : pundlika vs. the tahasildar aliyal. 36640.air1952sc75: the state of w.b vs. ..... a person under 18 years of age, 'any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; ..... of petitioner had made an application on 10.10.1971 in form no.1 of the karnataka land revenue (regularisation of unauthorised occupation of lands) rules, 1970 for regularization of unauthorized occupation of government paisari land and said application is said to have not been disposed of. petitioner claims to have written to respondents .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... of gunwant kaur [(1969) 3 scc769 finds support from another judgment of this court in the case of century spg. and mfg. co. ltd. v. ulhasnagar municipal council [(1970) 1 scc582 wherein this court held: (scc p. 587, para13) merely because a question of fact is raised, the high court will not be justified in requiring the party ..... any person, if such document is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced from proper custody. 26.7. a perusal of section 81 of indian evidence act, extracted hereinabove, would indicate that the court shall presume the genuineness of every document, be it official gazette or government gazette printed by the queens printer, which - 159 ..... it is for shri. uttaradi mutt to file such a suit.-. 60 - nc:2024. khc-d:7502 wp no.103982 of 2023 c/w wp no.103994 of 2023 10.39. in tejraj-president, jain sangh v. state (m.b.) & collector4, particularly para 10 thereof, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:19. the supreme court then, after .....
Tag this Judgment!