Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-17-1992
Reported in : 1992(1)ALT713
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. In this batch of cases common questions arise for consideration and so we are inclined to deal with them by this common judgment. Writ Appeal No. 1402 of 91 is from the order of our learned brother Sivaraman Nair, J., in W.P.No. 15595 of 91 dismissing the writ petition filed by Dr. A.S. Chandra, a private medical practitioner running Sarada Nursing Home in Chirala, Prakasam district. The wife of the fourth respondent received treatment as an out patient between 15-7-91 and 26-7-91 at Sarada Nursing Home for Epigastrium and Chest pain and Nausea. After routine tests were conducted she was admitted as an inpatient on 26-7-91 and operated for Cystectomy, Hystrectomy and Appendectomy. When Laparotomy test was conducted upon her on 15-8-91 it was found that she developed Peritonitis. The nursing home collected Rs. 500/- towards medical fee and Rs. 200/- each for the anaesthetist and two surgeons, Rs. 1,100/- in all. The patient had to be removed to the Government Hospita...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-28-1992
Reported in : 1993(1)ALT430
ORDERP.L. Narasimha Sarma, J.1. This application is filed for punishing respondents 1 to 5 under the Contempt of Courts Act (Act 70 of 1971) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The facts which are either admitted or borne out of the record are as follows: Petitioner is working as a Lecturer in Economics in C.S.R. Sarma College, Ongole from 1973. He was elected as the Chairman of the Staff Association. As the Chairman of the Staff Association, he became the Officio Member of the Governing Body of the C.S.R. Sarma College, Ongole (for short 'College'). The College was one of the centres for conducting Intermediate Public examinations. Certain irregularities with regard to invigilation seem to have been committed during the course of the conduct of the Intermediate public examinations, with which we are not concerned in these proceedings. The governing body of the college met on 24-4-1988 to consider the alleged irregularities committed as mentioned above. It is stated by the petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-16-1992
Reported in : AIR1992AP324; 1992(2)ALT549
ORDERMohd. Sardar Ali Khan, J.1. W.A.No. 1080/88 and W.A. No. 1088/88 go hand in hand together over a common area of facts and share common questions of law between themselves. Hence both the cases have been taken up together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. W.A.No. 1080/88 has been filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department and two others against the judgment dated 23-2-1988 passed in W.P. No. 2878 of 1986 mainly on the ground that the learned single Judge committed an error in issuing a writ of mandamus directing the Government to sell the Government land to the petitioner, who is a private party, at a fixed price. It is also averred that the petitioner, in whose favour the judgment of the learned single Judge had been passed, had no legal right to claim the Government land and hence the plea of mandamus on his behalf is totally unwarranted.3. W.A. No. 1088/88 is, on the other hand, filed by the writ petitioner Mr. C. K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-29-1992
Reported in : AIR1993AP76
ORDERV. Sivaraman Nair, J.1. This Writ Appeal arises from the interim order passed by our learned brother Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J., in W.P. No. 17955/91 in W.P. No/4513/1991. By his order dated 30-10-1991, the learned single Judge directed stay of all further proceedings pursuant to G.O. Ms. No. 957 Revenue (UC.I) Depart-ruent, dated 25th October, 1991. Against the interim order the State has appealed. On its admission on 8-11-1991, the Division Bench directed that the Writ Appeal be posted along with Writ Petition No. 4513/1991. Hence both the matters are before us. In view of the fact that we are hearing the Writ Petition, it is not necessary for us to consider the Writ Appeal separately.2. The Writ Petition is filed on behalf of M.JE.H. the Nizam-VIII, represented by the General Power of Attorney, to call for and quash Government Memo No. 580/ U.C.II(2) / 83-87, Revenue (UC.II) Department, dt. 16-3-1991. Nassar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed W.P. No. 14942/91 seeking ...
Tag this Judgment!