Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-15-1983
Reported in : (1983)37CTR(AP)294; [1984]148ITR287(AP)
Seetharama Reddy, J. 1. The question for decision in this reference at the instance of the Revenue, is : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the interest income of Rs. 1,98,791 is exempt from income-tax for the assessment year 1975-76 ?' 2. Before the above question was sought to be referred to this court at the instance of the Revenue, M.P. No. 63/79 was filed by the assessee before the Appellate Tribunal for giving a decision with respect to the sum of Rs. 1,98,791 which accrued as interest out of the principal sum of Rs. 56,97,657 which the Welfare Society-assessee-kept in a bank. This arose because of the fact that earlier in I.T.A.No. 595/79, which pertained to the principal sum which stood in the name of the assessee-society in a bank as a sequel to the raffle conducted on behalf of the society by the Government, one of the issues framed was : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-01-1983
Reported in : AIR1983AP356
ORDER1. This civil revision petition is filed by sareetha, a well- known film actress of the south Indian screeen agianst an order passed by the learned subordinate Judge , cuddapah ,overruling her objection raised to the enter taining of an application filed by one venkata subbaiah, under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) for restitution of conjugal rights with her.2. Sareetha while studying in a highschool and then hardly aged about sixteen-years and staying with her parents at Madras was alleged to have been given in marriage to the said venkata subbaiah, at Tirupathi on 13-12-1975. Almost immediately thereafter they were separated from each other and have been continuously living apart fromeach othe for these five-years and more. Venkata subbaish had, therefore, filed under section 9 of the Act O.P. No. 1 of 1981 on the file of the subcourt, cuddapah for restitution of conjugal rights with sareetha. Sareetha had taken a preliminary objection ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-25-1983
Reported in : (1983)IILLJ57AP
ORDER1. The writ petition is filed to quash the orders of termination issued by the respondent company on 4th October, 1982. 2. The petitioner was selected and appointed by the respondent as Medical Officer on 18th September, 1980. As per the said order of appointment, the petitioner will be on probation for a period of one year and during the period of probation his services will be terminable by one month's notice on either side and on confirmation he will be required to enter into an agreement to serve the company for a period of five years from the date of confirmation, and the order further recites that the company reserves the right to terminate the contract by giving him three months notice or three months pay in lieu of notice without assigning any reason. On 30th October, 1981 the Personnel Officer addressed a letter to the superintendent, Area Hospital, Bellampalli where the petitioner was working proposing the confirmation and also requiring the necessary agreement to be tak...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-22-1983
Reported in : (1984)IILLJ140AP
..... opportunities (articles 38(2); to secure the right to an adequate means to livelihood (art. 39(a); right to work (art. 41); with special emphasis to weaker sections and in particular schedule castes and schedule tribes, etc. (article 46). 'majority of its ..... of privilege was nurtured and applied. charles a. reich in his 'the new property' reported in 1963-64, 73 yale law journal, page 733 and 734 states that : 'today more and more of our wealth takes the form of right or status; rather than ..... content by a process of judicial construction. the wavelengths of comprehending the scope and ambit of the fundamental rights has been said in cooper's case : [1970]3scr530 and our approach in the interpretation of the fundamental rights must be in tune with the wavelength.'dominant purpose theory : 96. in madhav ..... officials under their thumb or distribute the largesse at their disposal to their party supporters or commit acts of misfeasance. intelligent and energetic youth quick with perception of such evils prevalent around them contaminating the democratic fabric and enthusiastic to eradicate them espouse the public ..... state of haryana v. subhash chander marwaha (supra) and mrs. kunda v. maharashtra public service commission 1980(2) s.l.r. 145. he further relied upon, for the preposition that the petitioner has no fundamental right to ..... controversy of considerable interest and public importance is aroused by this writ appeal preferred under clause 15 of the letters patent against the order of our .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-08-1983
Reported in : AIR1984AP75
Ramaswamy, J.1. These four writ petitions consisting of individual and juristic persons (Partnership Firms) and a lone lessee-licensees of cinema buildings (hereinafter called 'theatres') situation in West Godavari, Khammam, Nizambad and Mahboobnagar Districts are the petitioners. They invoked the constitutional remedy under Article 226 impugning 'the vires of R. 12 (3)' of the Andhra Pradesh Cinema (Regulation) Rules, (1970), hereinafter called 'the impugned Rule', mounting three pronged attack viz., infringement of their fundamental right to carry on trade or business in exhibiting cinematographs, on the anvil of (1) smack of statutory base, (2) excessive delegation and (3) unreasonable constraint in the exercise and enjoyment of their aforesaid right. Whether the base thus created on their four pillars (writ petitions) stand erected on solid foundation or shifting sand, is the subject of broach hereinafter. The reliefs claimed thereon are : (a) for declaration that the conferment of...
Tag this Judgment!