Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-31-1978
Reported in : AIR1978AP342
Gangadhara Rao, J.1. These two appeals are filed against the judgement of Punnayya, J. in AAO, Nos. 76 and 77 of 1975.2. The respondent filed the suit O. S. No.93/1957 for the partition of the plaint A Schedule properties into two equal shares and for separate possession of one such share for her, after setting aside the alienations made by her son, the 1st defendant, in favour of defendants 2 to 5. The suit was decreed on 29-7-1958 and the alienations were set aside. The 2nd defendant, an alienee, preferred the appeal A. S. No. 506/1969 in the High Court, but it was dismissed on 26-9-1963. Then he filed L.P.A. No. 104/1964. It was also dismissed on 30-10-1969 with some directions. The decree-holder filed E. P. No. 39/1973 on 23-4-1973 against the 2nd defendant for recovery of costs. She also filed E.P. No. 151/1973 for recovery of mesne profits.3. In E. P. No. 39/1973 the 2nd defendant has raised an objection that it was barred by limitation under Art. 136 of the Limitation Act. The l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-07-1978
Reported in : [1978]42STC276(AP)
Sambasiva Rao, J.1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh promulgated an Ordinance, Ordinance No. 2 of 1978, amending certain provisions of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The present writ petition is filed challenging the said Ordinance to the extent that it amends item 26 of the First Schedule of the A. P. G. S. T. Act. It is stated that in so far as item 26 is concerned the amendment is unconstitutional as it operates in a denial of equality before law.2. Before the amendment, item 26 stood as hereunder :______________________________________________________________Description of Point of levy Rate of taxthe goods______________________________________________________________(1) (2) (3)______________________________________________________________26. All liquors other At the point 25 paise in thethan country liquor. of first sale rupee.in the State._____________________________________________________________By virtue of Clause 6(1) of the Ordinance, the said item26 is ame...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-13-1978
Reported in : 1988(34)ELT49(AP)
Seetharam Reddy, J1. These three writ appeals arise out of a common order in W.P.Nos. 2423, 2424 and 3418 of 1975 made by our learned brother Kondaiah, J., dismissing the same as not competent and maintainable. The parties are common in all these writ appeals as well as the writ petitions, and common questions do arise for consideration out of the same. The same may be disposed of by a common judgment. 2. The price point that arises in these writ appeals, is whether the appellant, who is a manufacturer of automobile ancillaries, is entitled to import Heat Resistance Steel (hereinafter referred to as H.R.S) based on the actual consumption. 3. The appellant - petitioner, who is common in all these three writ appeals, is a Small Scale Industrial Unit owned by a registered partnership known as Keshavji Ravji & Co., Madras, whose principal business is Imports and Exports, with its Head Office at Madras. The petitioner is a manufacturer, inter alia of automobile ancillaries. For the purpose ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-28-1978
Reported in : [1983]53CompCas269(AP)
Lakshmaiah, J.1. These appeals under Section 110D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, referred to hereinafter as 'the Act', are directed against certain awards made by the learned Addl. District Jugde-cum-Addl. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Krishna at Machilipatnam in applications filed by the legal representatives of the deceased under Section 110A of the Act awarding certain amounts towards compensation in respect of an accident involving the death of certain persons.2. On 30th June, 1973, an accident took place during the early hours between milestones 221/4 and 221/6 near Ambarpet on the highway, Hyderabad to Vijayawada while M. Radha Kirshnamurthy, Regional Transport Officer, Guntur, M. Purnachandra Rao, Motor Vehicles Inspector, Tenali, R. Ranga Rao, driver of Ambassador car, AAG, 1652, S. Subba Rao, Motor Vehicles Inspector, Guntur and Ammer, the driver working under S. Subba Rao were travelling in the Ambassador car, AAG. 1652 when a lorry TNU. 3360, driven by one by name R. Se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-13-1978
Reported in : AIR1979AP280
Seetharama Reddy, J,1. These three writs appeals arise out of a common order in W. P. Nos. 2423, 2424 and 3418 of 1975 made by our learned brother Kondaiah, J. dismissing the same as not competent and not maintainable. The parties are common in all these Writ Appeals as well as the Writ Petitions, and common questions do arise for consideration out of the same. The same may be disposed of by a common judgment,2. The prime point that arises in these writ appeals, is whether the appellant a-he is a manufacturer of automobile ancillaries, is entitled to import Heat Resistant Steel hereinafter referred to HRS, based on the actual consumption.3. The appellant-petitioner, who is common to all these three Writ Appeals, is a Small Scale Industrial Unit owned by a registered partnership known as Keshavji Ravji & Co., Madras whose principal business is Imports and Exports, with its Head Office at Madras. The petitioner is a manufacturer, inter alia, of automobile ancillaries. For that purpose of...
Tag this Judgment!