Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents act 1970 39 of 1970 section 145 publication of official journal Court: allahabad Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.704 seconds)

Aug 30 1989 (HC)

Centre of Indian Trade Unions U.P. State Committee, Kanpur Vs. the Act ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-30-1989

Reported in : AIR1990All55; (1990)2UPLBEC946

ORDERS. C. Mathur, J.1. This petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 13-7-1989, Annexure-1, passed by the Acting Chief Justice of this Court, whereby Writ Petition No. 3987 of 198. M/s. J. K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd. v. State of U.P. and others, has been directed to be transferred to the Allahabad Bench of this Court. The order has been passed under the second proviso to clause 14 of the U.P. High Courts (Amalgamation) Order, 1948. A few facts necessary for the disposal of the petition may be stated.2. There was dispute between the Management of J. K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd., for short Management, and the workers of the Company which was referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Allahabad; it is adjudication Case No. 15 of 1986. The Tribunal gave its award oh 24-12-1988; it is popularly known as 'Pandey Award'. The State Government did not accept the award and cancelled the same by order dated ...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1989 (HC)

Shyam Jewellers and anr. Vs. Chief Commissioner (Administration) and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-06-1989

Reported in : [1992]196ITR243(All)

S.H.A. Raza J.1. M/s. Shyam Jewellers and its proprietor have filed these writ petitions claiming various reliefs against the Income-tax Department and the action taken by it which, according to the petitioner,is against propriety and legality and which has caused huge loss and is the result of mala fide and calculated action.2. The first writ petition (Writ Petition No. 6218 of 1987) is against the action to seal off the petitioner's shop and the notice which has been pasted over the shop. The petitioners have prayed for issue of a writ, order or direction for quashing the order contained in annexure No. 2 to the writ petition and have further prayed for issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the first information report (annexure No. 1). In the second Writ Petition No. 22 of 1988, the original relief was for the issue of a writ of mandamus, directing the opposite parties to restore the articles, etc., to the petitioners, which were seized and to declare the sealing ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //