Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-2017
W.P.(C) 6728/2013, C.M. APPL.14592/2013 W.P.(C) 4792/2014, C.M. APPL.9548/2014 W.P.(C) 6767/2014, C.M. APPL.16010/2014 W.P.(C) 2825/2015, C.M. APPL.5077/2015 W.P.(C) 2886/2015, C.M. APPL.5179/2015 W.P.(C) 3247/2015, C.M. APPL.5819/2015 & 5820/2015 W.P.(C) 3308/2015, C.M. APPL.5928/2015 W.P.(C) 3626/2015, C.M. APPL.6472/2015 W.P.(C) 6839/2015, C.M. APPL.12508/2015 W.P.(C) 9166/2015, C.M. APPL.20893 & 20894/2015 W.P.(C) 1927/2016, C.M. APPL.8262/2016 W.P.(C) 5994/2016, C.M. APPL.24660/2016 & 24661/2016 W.P.(C) 9153/2016, C.M. APPL.37062-37063/2016 FASHION DESIGN COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner % + W.P.(C) 2563/2013 versus $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:24. 11.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 4966/2013, C.M. APPL.11216/2013, 6704/2016, 6706/2014 & 44758/2016, W.P.(C) 10729/2016, W.P.(C) 10731/2016 BCCI versus ........ Petitioner GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2563/2013 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 07.2017 Pronounced on:20. 12.2017 + W.P.(C) 9357/2016 HARI RAM & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Padma Kumar S., Sh. Amandeep Joshi and Sh. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, Sh. Rhishabh Jetley, Ms. Pratishtha Vij and Sh. Urvi Mohan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Complaining of unjustified denial of third financial upgradation 1. under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (hereafter called MACPS, for convenience), the writ petitioners approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for appropriate directions.2. Both the petitioners joined the establishment of the High Court initially in the cadre of Upper Division Clerk [UDC]. (the first petitioner on 05.09.1998 and the second petitioner on 22.10.1984) from which...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2017 + CS(OS) 2934/2011 J.C. BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Versus BULL MACHINES PVT. LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiffs ..... Defendant : : Mr P. Chidambaram, Senior Advocate with Mr Pravin Anand, Ms Vaishali Mittal and Ms Geetanjali Visvanathan. Mr A.N. Haksar, Senior Advocate with Mr Udayan Jain, Ms Anju Thomas and Mr Kamal Sharma. For the Defendant CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J IA Nos. 1733/2015 & 1732/2015 1. The defendant (hereafter BMPL) has filed the afore-captioned applications under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC (IA No.1732/2015) and under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC (IA No.1733/2015). By way of IA No.1732/2015, BMPL prays that suit be dismissed with exemplary costs and in IA No.1733/2015, BMPL seeks the following relief:-"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may most graciously be pleased to pass a judg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-15-2017
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.4470/2015 (GM-RES) C/W W.P.No.56789/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.No.59460/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.No.59587/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.53876-877/2015 (GM-RES), W.P.No.27715-716/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.31838/2016 & 33042/2016(GM-RES), W.P.No.100996/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.101879/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103356/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103391/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103417/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103517-518/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103519/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103520/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103521-522/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103744/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103796/2016 & 103978/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103797/2016 & 103977/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103873-874/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103875-876/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103877-878/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103970-971/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34184/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34185/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34186/2016 (GM-RES), W...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-15-2017
$~OS-9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 12.2017 CS(OS) 3132/2014, CC712015, I.A. 20105/2014 and I.A.14072/2015 MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Tusha Malhotra and Ms.Udita M.Patro, Advs. versus VINOD JADHAV & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Aditya Kumar, proxy counsel for Mr.Vinod Jadhav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) I.A. 20105/2014 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking an ex parte ad interim injunction against the defendants so as to restrain the defendants from infringing the registered patent in respect to SITAGLIPTIN.2. Brief facts of this application are that the plaintiffs are the registered patentee for drug SITAGLIPTIN having an Indian Patent No.209816. The said drug was approved for sale in the Indian Market on 28.03.2008. Thereafter Plaintiff No.1 is selling the said drug in India under the trademark JANUVIA and J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-14-2017
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.5375-5377 OF2017TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S PRIUS AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) is an automobile manufacturer incorporated under the laws prevailing in Japan. The first respondent is a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture of automobile spare parts of which the second and third respondents are partners. The partnership firm of the respondents was constituted in the year 2001. The fourth respondent is a Private Limited Company in which the second and third respondents are majority shareholders. 2 2. Civil Suit [CS (OS) No.2490 of 2009]. was instituted by the plaintiff in the Delhi High Court seeking a decree of permanent injunction for infringement of trade mark, passing off and for damages against the respondents (hereinafter referred to as the defendants) in orde...
Tag this Judgment!