Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-31-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking compensation against the opposite parties no.1 and 2 a sum of `50,00,000/- with interest @24% p.a. and costs. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant, a government school teacher was proceeding as pillion rider on a Motor Cycle on 21.07.2006 which met with an accident resulting in injury and swelling to the complainants left knee for treatment of which he consulted a local doctor who treated him for two days and thereafter the complainant attended to his duties. In the month of August,2006 the complainant consulted twice Dr.Kauliah and once Dr.Hari Prasad and he was relieved of the pain. On 31.12.2006 the complainant had been to Shirdi and on 4.01.2007 he experienced pain in his left knee and when he consulted Dr.Hari Prasad at Nizamabad he advised the complainant to do some physiotherapy exercise and consult a knee specialist. The complainant had done the physiotherapy exercise...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :05. 12.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:21. 12.2012 + ITA NOS. 87/2003 & ITA NOS. 1411/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. M/S. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA NOS. 1541/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..Appellant Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Gayatri Verma and Sh. Puneet Gupta, Jr. Standing Counsel. Vs. DEWAN CHAND SATYAPAL Respondent Through : Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Satyen Sethi, Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Ms. Husnal Syali, Sh. Mayank Nagi and Sh. Rahul Sateeja, Advocates. ITA Nos. 87/03, 1411, 1541/06 Page 1 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment dis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:21. t December, 2012 % + + + + + + + + + ITA 754/2010 & C.M. APPL. No.15650/2012 ITA 773/2010 ITA 775/2010 ITA 1092/2010 ITA 1101/2010 ITA 1103/2010 ITA 1104/2010 ITA 1112/2010 ITA 1124/2010 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Karan Chauhan, Advocate. Versus VISHWA JAGRITI MISSION Through: ......Respondent Mr. N. K. Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajender Singhvi, Mr. Amit Aggarwal and Mr. Anurag Dubey, Advocate for applicant/ interveners. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.These are nine appeals, all filed by Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). ITA Nos.754/2010, 773/2010, 775/2010, 1092/2010, 1101/2010, 1103/2010, 1104/2010, 1112/2010 & 1124/2010 questions of law were framed by this Court on 21.11.2011 in ITA Nos.754/2010, 773...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-21-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties for payment of `14,00,000/- towards medical and other expenses along with compensation of `50 lakh and costs. 2. The averments of the complaint are that on 6.8.2008 the complainant during her period of pregnancy, approached the opposite party no.1 for regular check-up and he suggested LSCS to the complainant and advised her to be admitted in opposite party no.3 hospital. On 7.8.2008 at about 8.00 p.m. she was admitted in opposite party no.3 hospital and cesarean operation was done on the complainant on 8.8.2008. The complainant gave birth to a male child. The opposite party no.2 after conducting investigation on 9.8.2008 issued report showing no complications. On 9.8.2008 at about 4.45 p.m. the complainant was administered blood transfusion as per the instructions of the opposite party no.1. The complainant developed complications during blood transfusion and it w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:17. 12.2012 Judgment Delivered on:20. 12.2012 % + W.P.(C) 1074/2012 & CM 2363/2012 JASJIT SINGH AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Abhishek K. Mishra, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE OF GURDWARA ELECTIONS (THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR) AND ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, ASC with Ms Shawana Bari, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr Jasmeet Singh, Mr Saurabh Tiwari & Ms Vatsala Singh, Advs. for R-3. Mr Raj Kamal & Mr Faraz Khan, Advs. for R4&6. Ms Rashmi Chopra, Adv. for R-5. + W.P.(C) 936/2012 DASHMESH SEWA SOCIETY (REGD) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Baljit Singh & Mr Ajai Kumar, Advs. versus DIRECTOR GURDWARA ELECTIONS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, ASC with Ms Shawana Bari, Adv. for R-1. Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr Jasmeet Singh, Mr Saurabh Tiwari & Ms Vatsala Singh, Advs. for R-2. Mr Raj Kamal & Mr Faraz Khan, Advs. for R-3. Ms Rashmi Chopra, Adv. for R-4. CO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:17. 12.2012 Judgment Delivered on:20. 12.2012 % + W.P.(C) 1074/2012 & CM 2363/2012 JASJIT SINGH AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Abhishek K. Mishra, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE OF GURDWARA ELECTIONS (THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR) AND ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, ASC with Ms Shawana Bari, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr Jasmeet Singh, Mr Saurabh Tiwari & Ms Vatsala Singh, Advs. for R-3. Mr Raj Kamal & Mr Faraz Khan, Advs. for R4&6. Ms Rashmi Chopra, Adv. for R-5. + W.P.(C) 936/2012 DASHMESH SEWA SOCIETY (REGD) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Baljit Singh & Mr Ajai Kumar, Advs. versus DIRECTOR GURDWARA ELECTIONS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Rajiv Nanda, ASC with Ms Shawana Bari, Adv. for R-1. Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr Jasmeet Singh, Mr Saurabh Tiwari & Ms Vatsala Singh, Advs. for R-2. Mr Raj Kamal & Mr Faraz Khan, Advs. for R-3. Ms Rashmi Chopra, Adv. for R-4. CO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No. 2880/2011 in CS(OS) 2014/2010 SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES N.V. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Munindra Dwivedi with Mr. Kuber Dewan and Mr. Varun Mishra, Advocates. versus M/S AMITA ENTERPRISES & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Jain with Ms. Reenna Rawat, Advocate along with defendant No.1 in person. Mr. Gagan Gupta, Advocate for the defendant No.2. % Date of Decision : December 20, 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Plaintiff has filed the aforementioned interim application, being IA No.2880/2011, praying for passing of an order granting stay of the proceedings in Consumer Complaint No.11 of 2009, pending before the Consumer Disputes Redressal District Forum, Gautam Budh Nagar till adjudication of the suit filed by the Plaintiff.2. The facts material for the determination of the present application are as follows.3. The Plaintiff instituted the abovementioned Inter-pleader suit un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
Crl. Revision No.4122 of 2012 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No.4122 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:20. 12.2012. Dr. Mehboob .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.R.S.Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner was tried for offence punishable under Section 18(c) punishable under Section 27(b)(ii).section 18(A) punishable under Section 28, 18(a) (I) read with Section 17A Rule 125A and Schedule R-1 punishable under Section 27(a) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 ('Act' for short).The Trial Court vide judgment/order dated 18.1.2011/22.1.2011 ordered the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 27(b) and 28 of the Act. Aggrieved against the said judgment/order of conviction and sentence, the petitioner preferred an appeal. The Appellate Court vide judgment dated 11.12.2012 acquitted the petitioner qua off...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2012
G. George Paracken: 1. The challenge in this Original Application is against the order dated 23.11.aggrieved by the impugned Annexure A-1 show cause notice dated 03.03.2011 proposing to cancel his candidature for the post of Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police. He is also aggrieved by the Annexure A-2 order dated 02.03.2011 by which his candidature has been cancelled. 2. This case was earlier heard and disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal vide its order dated 15.11.2011. In fact, this O.A was allowed and the respondents were directed to give appointment to the applicant to the post of Constable (Exe.) on the ground that his case was squarely covered by the earlier order of a co-ordinate Bench in Dharam Veer Singh Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. (OA 164/2010) decided on 25.11.2010 having its operative part as under: 6. It is not possible to agree with the arguments of the Respondents in view of the fact that the candidature of the Applicant has not been cancelle...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:21. t November, 2012 Date of Pronouncement:19. h December, 2012. + W.P.(C) 2942/2012 RAM GOPAL SINGH SISODIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K. Kapoor, Adv. with Ms.Shweta Kapoor, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC, Mr.Ashish Virmani, Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Mr.Ravjyot, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW : D.MURUGESAN, CHIEF JUSTICE 1 This writ petition in the form of pro bono publico petition has been filed by one Sh.Ram Gopal Singh Sisodia seeking for a direction to issue a writ of quo warranto quashing the nomination of Sh.Sachin Tendulkar as a member of Rajya Sabha (Council of States) as made by the President of India. The petitioner is the Editor-in-Chief of Jan Chetna, a National Weekly Newspaper. He is Ex-Member of Metropolitan Council/Ex- Member of Legislative Assembly, Delhi...
Tag this Judgment!