Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-09-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.131/2020 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6999 of 2017) BALKRISHNA RAM APPELLANT(S) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.Leave granted.2. One of the issues raised in this appeal is whether an appeal against an order of a single judge of a High Court deciding a case related to an Armed Forces personnel pending before the High Court is required to be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal or should be heard by the High Court. 2 3. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT for short) was constituted under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), enacted with the purpose of constituting an AFT to adjudicate disputes and complaints of personnel belonging to the Armed Forces. Chapter III of the Act, deals with the jurisdiction, power and authority of the Tribunal. Section 14(1) of the Act which is relevant reads as follows: 14. Jurisdiction, pow...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-17-2020
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JANUARY2020BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA ELECTION PETITION NO.1 OF2019BETWEEN : SRI A MANJU S/O LATE ANNAIAH GOWDA, AGED ABOUT61YEARS, R/AT HANYALU VILLAGE, ANANDUR POST, ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI: GURUMATH GANGADHAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI: M R VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI. PRAJWAL REVANNA @ PRAJWAL R S/O H D REVANNA, AGED ABOUT28YEARS, R/AT NO.43, PADAVALAHIPPE VILLAGE & POST, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211.2. SRI K.H. VINOD RAJ S/O HANUMANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT29YEARS, R/AT NO.562/2, 2 AMBEDKAR NAGAR, KONANURU, ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102.3. SRI H.M. CHANDREGOWDA S/O SRI MALLALIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT65YEARS, NO.54, HONASHATTIHALLI, SRINIVASAPURA POST, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211.4. M MAHESH @ LOKESH S/O LATE SRI H.C. MANJAPPA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT49YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.349, SAISADANA, HEMAVATHINAGAR, NEAR CH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-24-2020
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN WRIT PETITION No.6872/2013(KLR)BETWEEN : 1 . SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED50YEARS2. 3 . 4 . SRI NAGESH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED32YEARS SRI MAHESH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED31YEARS PETITIONER Nos. 1 TO3ARE R/A NO.490/A, ACCS LAYOUT D BLOCK, SINGASANDRA CHIKKABEGUR ROAD, MADIVALA PO, BANGALORE68 SMT. ROOPA W/O D S NAGARAJ AGED28YEARS (BY SRI SUNIL S RAO, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONERS SRI S.P. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL AS AMICUS CURIAE, ...PETITIONERS SRI K. SUMAN, AS AMICUS CURIAE, SRI V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL, SRI M.R. RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE, SRI BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE, 2 SRI UDAYAPRAKASH MULIYA, ADVOCATE, SRI RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE, SRI AJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE, SMT. CHANNAMMA, ADVOCATE, SRI G.B. SHASTRY, ADVOCATE TO ASSIST HONBLE COURT) AND: 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . THE STATE OF...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Feb-12-2020
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT APPEAL NO.200131/2019 (LB-RES) Appellant BETWEEN : Smt. R. Sharada W/o Late R. Dharmaraj Age:52. Years, Occ: Household R/o 3-9-24, Jain Temple Road Raichur, Dist. Raichur (Sri Vidyashankar G. Dalwai & Sri Mahantesh Patil, Advocates) And:1. The Commissioner City Municipality, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101 2. Smt. Geeta Sanabal W/o Pradeep Kumar Age:40. Years, Occ: Household R/o H.No.7-6-255 (Ganga Nivas) Vasavi Nagar, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101 2 3. Smt. Jyoti Sanabal W/o Ramesh Sanabal Age:35. Years, Occ: Household R/o H.No.7-6-255 (Ganga Nivas) Vasavi Nagar, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101... RESPONDENTS (Sri Gourish S. Khashampur, Advocate for R1 Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate for R2 & R3) This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed by t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Feb-12-2020
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT APPEAL NO.200131/2019 (LB-RES) Between: Smt. R. Sharada W/o Late R. Dharmaraj Age:52. Years, Occ: Household R/o 3-9-24, Jain Temple Road Raichur, Dist. Raichur Appellant (Sri Vidyashankar G. Dalwai & Sri Mahantesh Patil, Advocates) And:1. The Commissioner City Municipality, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101 2. Smt. Geeta Sanabal W/o Pradeep Kumar Age:40. Years, Occ: Household R/o H.No.7-6-255 (Ganga Nivas) Vasavi Nagar, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101 2 3. Smt. Jyoti Sanabal W/o Ramesh Sanabal Age:35. Years, Occ: Household R/o H.No.7-6-255 (Ganga Nivas) Vasavi Nagar, Raichur Dist. Raichur-584101 Respondents (Sri Gourish S. Khashampur, Advocate for R1 Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate for R2 & R3) This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed by the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-14-2020
1 INDEX OF ORDER Sl. Description Page Nos. No.Cause title 3-23 I Facts of the case 4-31 II Statement of objections on behalf 31-50 of Respondent No.2 III Memo filed by the State 5-52 Government IV Arguments advanced by the 52-56 learned counsel for the petitioners V Arguments advanced on behalf of 56-57 the State Government VI Arguments advanced by Sri N. 57-61 Khetty, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 MCI VII Arguments advanced by Sri 61-70 Adithya Sondhi, learned senior counsel for Respondent Nos.52 to 108 students VIII Point for determination 70 IX Determination 71 X Importance of Education 76-77 XI Objections filed by the Medical 77-80 Council of India in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 2 Objections filed by the State XII Government in W.P. Nos.4557- 80-82 4561/2019 XIII Statement of objections by the 82-85 College in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 XIV Decision in W.P. Nos.4557- 85-88 4561/2019 dated 22.8.2019 filed by the students XV Dual stand taken by the MCI and 88-91 the State Gove...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-04-2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1966-1967 OF2020(Arising out of SLP(C) No.5840 of 2015) CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER ..Appellant VERSUS HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER ..Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. The point falling for determination in this appeal is as regards the right of a third party to apply for certified copies to be obtained from the High Court by invoking the provisions of Right to Information Act without resorting to Gujarat High Court Rules prescribed by the High Court.3. Brief facts which led to filing of this appeal are as follows:- An RTI application dated 05.04.2010 was filed by respondent No.2 seeking information pertaining to the following cases Civil Application No.5517 of 2003 and Civil Application No.8072 of 1989 1 along with all relevant documents and certified copies. In reply, by letter dated 29.04.2010, Public Information Officer, Gujarat High Court informed respondent No.2 t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-13-2020
R1- - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.506 / 2018 CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL PETITION No.6664 / 2017 CRL.RP.506/2018 BETWEEN: Mr. Siddappa H. Kaller S/o Mr. Hosurappa Aged about 46 years Working as a Senior RTO R/at 185, 9th Cross, 3rd Stage Rajajinagara, Bangaluru Native of Kallugudde Village Akki Aluru Hobli Hanagal Taluk Haveri Dist:581102. Petitioner (By Sri Shankarappa - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka By Lokayuktha Police Chikmagaluru-577101. Respondent (By Sri Venkatesh .S. Arabatti Spl.P.P) 2 - - This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to, set aside the order dated 26.02.2018 in Spl. C.C.No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru under P.C. Act, discharge the petitioner from the offences alleged p/u/Sec. 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of P.C....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-13-2020
R1- - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.506 / 2018 CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL PETITION No.6664 / 2017 CRL.RP.506/2018 BETWEEN: Mr. Siddappa H. Kaller S/o Mr. Hosurappa Aged about 46 years Working as a Senior RTO R/at 185, 9th Cross, 3rd Stage Rajajinagara, Bangaluru Native of Kallugudde Village Akki Aluru Hobli Hanagal Taluk Haveri Dist:581102. Petitioner (By Sri Shankarappa - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka By Lokayuktha Police Chikmagaluru-577101. Respondent (By Sri Venkatesh .S. Arabatti Spl.P.P) 2 - - This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to, set aside the order dated 26.02.2018 in Spl. C.C.No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru under P.C. Act, discharge the petitioner from the offences alleged p/u/Sec. 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of P.C....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-17-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2566 of 2019 Bengaluru Development Authority ...Appellant Versus Mr Sudhakar Hegde & Ors. ...Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Index A B C D E F Introduction Submissions Issues Date of commencement of the PRR project Applicability of the EIA Notification 2006 Compliance with the procedure under the EIA Notification 2006 1 G Deficiencies in the EIA report G.1 Accreditation of the EIA consultant G.2 Forest land G.3 Trees G.4 Pipeline H Appraisal by the SEAC Courts and the environment Directions I J2PART A A Introduction 1. The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Principal Bench of the National Green Tribunal1 dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance2 granted to the appellant for the development of an eight lane Peripheral Ring Road3 connecting Tumkur Road to Hosur Road and totaling a length of 65 kilometers. The NGT was of the view that the primary data upon ...
Tag this Judgment!