Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : Feb-02-2016
..... and the ultimate declaration that the land is required for public purpose is done by issuing declaration in the notification, as required by section 6 of the said act. 21. section 11 deals with the enquiry and passing of the award by the collector and it contemplates that while making the award, the collector ..... grounds or additional compensation after getting knowledge of the essential contents of the award. 49. the very object of subsection (2) of section 12 of the said act to give notice of award only to such persons interested as were not present personally or by their representatives when the award was made, ..... the claimants received the compensation on 5-9-1991, and within a period of six weeks there-from, the reference was sought under section 18 of the said act for enhancement of compensation. the reference court enhanced the compensation, and in an appeal filed before the high court, it was held that ..... his award under section 11 of the land acquisition act on 1-8-1970. he issued the notice under section 12(2) of the said act, which was received by the respondent on 22-9-1970. the compensation was received under protest on 29-9-1970 and thereafter an application under section 18 of the said act was made ..... claim of the person interested that he did not have knowledge earlier will be accepted, unless there are compelling circumstances to not to do so. 39. in the decision of a three judges' bench of the apex court in the case of premji nathu v. state of gujarat and anr., reported .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : Apr-25-2016
..... no hesitation in holding that the contention that in a murder case, the court should insist upon plurality of witnesses, is much too broadly stated. section 134 of the indian evidence act, has categorically laid it down that "no particular number of witnesses shall, in any case, be required for the proof of any fact." ..... seven lives including that of an innocent child. not only did she forget her love for and duty towards her family, but also perpetrated the multiple homicide in her own house so as to fulfill her desire to be with the co-accused salim and grab the property leaving no heir but herself ..... fell a victim to the avaricious conduct and lust of the appellant sandeep, the manner in which the life of the deceased was snatched away by causing multiple injuries all over the body with all kinds of weapons, no leniency can be shown to the said appellant. 74. in the decision reported in swamy ..... 1998 scc (cri) 597. e) ganga singh .vs. state of madhya pradesh, (2013) 7 scc 278. f) sri bhagwan .vs. state of uttar pradesh, (2013) 12 scc 137. g) (2005) 10 scc 701, mishrilal and others .vs. state of m.p. and others. h) khuji @ surendra tiwari .vs. state of m.p., air 1991 sc ..... specific question was not put to the accused in his examination u/s.313 of the code of criminal procedure, it cannot be used against him. 39. however, the present case is not a case based on the circumstantial evidence wherein the prosecution would be required to prove each and every incriminating circumstance .....
Tag this Judgment!