Court : Jharkhand
..... : all these letters patent appeals arising out of three writ petitions being w.p (c) nos. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the letters patent appeal stands allowed, in the aforesaid terms. ..... , the order of blacklisting and cancellation of registration of m/s sanjay kumar choubey & company has been affirmed by the writ court, has given a cause to the appellant-writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) to file the present letters patent appeal.2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... resultantly, the instant letters patent appeal stands dismissed. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... this has given cause to the appellant-writ petitioner to knock at the door of this court through the medium of the instant letters patent appeal, in which pursuant to the notice, mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... resultantly, the present letters patent appeal deserves to be allowed as prayed for. ..... 5022 of 2009, the present letters patent appeal has been filed.2. ..... denial of salary for two years after the appellant was forced to superannuated on 31.01.2012, has given a cause of action to the employee to again knock the door of this court by filing the present letters patent appeal.8. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... hence, there is no substance in this letters patent appeal and we see no reason to take any other view than what has been taken by the learned single judge while dismissing the writ petition preferred by this appellant.11. ..... thus, this letters patent appeal is hereby dismissed. (d. n. ..... patel, j1 this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner (appellant herein), whose writ petition bearing w.p.s. ..... the said order was not challenged by this appellant and, therefor, also we see no reason to entertain this letter patent appeal.6. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... this is a false declaration whereas, looking to the annexure 14 of the supplementary affidavit filed by this appellant in this letters patent appeal, it appears that she was declared fail in the b.ed examination and again she appeared in the month of october, 2003 ..... looking to annexure 13 of the supplementary affidavit filed by this appellant in this letters patent appeal, it appears that she has mentioned in her application before the jharkhand public service commission, for the post in question that she has cleared b.ed examination from the ranchi university in the year ..... heard learned counsels for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to entertain this letters patent appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons :- i. ..... no.7898 of 2012, which was dismissed by the learned single judge vide order dated 03.12.2013 and hence, this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner.3. ..... aspects of the matter have been properly appreciated by the learned single judge while dismissing the writ petition preferred by this appellant and, hence, this letters patent appeal may not be entertained by this court.5. ..... , there being no substance, this letters patent appeal is hereby dismissed. (d. n. ..... patel, j1 this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner (appellant herein), whose writ petition bearing w.p(s) no.7898 of 2012 was dismissed by the learned single judge vide judgment and order dated 03.12.2013 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... (c) no.4399 of 2012 dated 17th march, 2015 whereby the petition preferred by the petitioner was dismissed and, therefore, the original petitioner has preferred this letters patent appeal.2) counsel for the appellant submitted that initially an auction notice was issued by the respondents on 24th november, 1999 for the auction of sand ghat, total 41 in number. ..... 4399 of 2012 dated 17th march, 2015.7) we, therefore, dismiss this letters patent appeal with cost of rs.10000/- (rupees ten thousand) only to be deposited by the appellant before the jharkhand state legal services authority, nyay sadan, ranchi, within a period of four weeks from today. ..... reasons :-6) having heard learned counsels for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we see no reason to entertain this letters patent appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: - 5 l.p.a. ..... the said direction given by the learned single judge will be set off and if there is any further outstanding amount, the same shall have to be paid by the appellant with interest and, hence, this letters patent appeal may not be entertained by this court. ..... 4399 of 2012 was preferred by this appellant which was also dismissed by the learned single judge vide order dated 17th march, 2015, against which, this letters patent appeal has been preferred. ..... patel, j1 this letters patent appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order delivered by learned single judge in w.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... ------ 10/23.09.2015 this letters patent appeal has been preferred challenging the legality and propriety of the order dated 20.09.2014 passed by learned single judge in w.p. (s) no. ..... hence, the letters patent appeal, being devoid of merits, is dismissed. (r.r. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 reportable cr. appeal (d.b.) no. 356 of 2014 [against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.12.2012 passed by the additional sessions judge 3rd, dhanbad in s.t. no.148 of 1999] --- jagdish gope son of late guhichandra gope, resident of village rudibasti, p.s. katras (kapuriya), p.o. katras, district dhanbad. appellant versus the state of jharkhand. respondent --- present hon ble mr. justice virender singh, chief justice hon'ble mr. justice p.p.bhatt --- for the appellant : mr. awnish shankar, advocate for the respondent : mr. pankaj kumar, a.p.p. --- dated 13th august, 2015 per virender singh,c.j.1. the sole appellant (hereinafter to be referred to as the accused) namely jagdish gope who was of the age of 44 years at the time of recording of his conviction vide impugned judgment dated 19 th december, 2012 handed down by the additional sessions judge-3 rd, dhanbad under section 302 of the indian penal code, has preferred the instant appeal through jharkhand state legal services authority (jhalsa), as he had no means to defend himself primarily for the reason that no one from his family has come forward, may be that he has killed his real uncle namely sukar gope (for short referred to as deceased). the arm allegedly used by him is stated to be axe. in common parlance it is known as 'tangi', a sharp edged weapon of heavy weight. there are as many as three injuries on the person of the deceased which proved to be fatal. it is a case resting upon eye version .....
Tag this Judgment!