Court : Guwahati
..... the documents furnished before the appellate tribunal and so also in the writ petition are the certificates issued by the gaon panchayat and some other persons in which it has been simply stated that the petitioner is the permanent resident of the village in question without any indication as to since when and that she was born and brought up in ..... , goalpara shall carry out further operation and enquiry to find out as to whether anyone else connected with the petitioners or any other person(s) in the area are illegal migrants to india and upon detection of any such foreign nationals who are illegal migrants within his jurisdiction, he shall take prompt and immediate action towards deportation of such foreign nationals in accordance ..... it is also not understood as to how this certificate could be issued by the particular gaon panchayat of barpeta district, when the petitioner claims to be the resident of village nabagota, simlitola under p.s. ..... depicting the names of her purported grand parents and father, purported land documents standing in her father's name and the certificate purportedly issued on 20.09.01 certifying her to be the resident of village kamarpota under simlitola gaon panchayat, no other documents have been annexed.28. ..... however, even in the writ petition except the certificate dated 12.07.02 issued by baghmara char gaon panchayat certifying her to be the resident of village no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... pws 2, 5, 6 and 7 are the co-villagers of the informant and out of them pw5 is the member of the panchayat, who was reported about the incident by the informant and pw4 immediately after the incident was disclosed by the prosecutrix. ..... submitted that according to the prosecution the prosecutrix disclosed the incident on 23.08.2004 to pw4 and, thereafter pw4 reported the same to pw1, the informant, and then reported the incident to pw5, the member of the panchayat in presence of pws 6 and 7 but the fir was not lodged immediately thereafter. ..... pw1, the uncle of the prosecutrix and pw4, grandmother of the prosecutrix, went to nakul sarkar(pw5), the member of the gram panchayat and reported the incident, who informed the village pradhan i.e. ..... pws 5 and 7, the member and pradhan of the panchayat, have supported the contention of the informant and pw4. ..... they reported the incident to the panchayat pradhan and member i.e. ..... the panchayat member and pradhan made an attempt to enquire about the incident and, accordingly, they called the accused but the accused did not turn up and, in the meantime, the prosecutrix was also suffering badly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
ranjan gogoi, j. 1. the writ petitioner, who has been dismissed from service after an enquiry into the charges levelled against him, has instituted the present proceedings challenging the aforesaid order of dismissal. an order of the appellate authority confirming the dismissal order passed by the disciplinary authority, is another aspect of the challenge in the present proceeding.2. a memorandum of charges was brought against the petitioner on 25.10.2000 alleging that on 29.8.2000 at about 21.30 hours, the writ petitioner under the influence of alcohol had assaulted two other constables of the c.i.s.f. in which organisation the petitioner was working. it was alleged that as a result of the aforesaid assault, the two other constables were injured and hospitalised. the writ petitioner was charged with indiscipline/misbehaviour in respect of the aforesaid incident and was asked to show cause as to why he should not be punished. the writ petitioner showed cause and the authority not being satisfied, decided to have an enquiry. an enquiry officer was appointed and as it now appears, in course of the enquiry, as many as 11 witnesses were examined in support of the charges. besides, a large number of documents were also brought on record in support of the charges. the writ petitioner/delinquent examined two defence witnesses in his favour and at the conclusion of the enquiry, for the reasons cited, the enquiry officer submitted a report dated 20.1.2001 holding the charges against .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... thereafter, he went the house of sadhan sutradhar, pradhan of aralia panchayat and informed him the fact which he gathered from parvati but did not take parvati with him to his house. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
(cav), j. this is an application under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, for short, the code, praying for quashing of order dated 19.06.2009 passed by the learned sub divisional judicial magistrate no. 2 in c.r. case no. 2158c/2009 so far as it relates to taking cognizance against the petitioner and issuing process under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881, for short, the act and the order dated 25.03.2011 and other subsequent orders where under bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner. 2. the case of the petitioner is that she is one of the directors of m/s upasana builders pvt. ltd., hereinafter referred to as company, which is a private limited company, registered under the companies act, 1956, along with her husband, who is the managing director of the company, who manages the affairs of the company. 3. the respondent no. 2 filed a complaint case before the learned chief judicial magistrate, kamrup under sections 138/141 of the act, wherein the present petitioner was impleaded as accused no. 3. it is stated that two postdated cheques bearing no. 403411 dated 28.11.2008 for rs. 17,07,290/- and no. 403412 dated 27.02.2009 for rs. 19,51,040/-, totaling rs. 36,58,330/-, which were handed over to the complainant/respondent no. 2 towards discharge of outstanding debt/liability for a loan availed of by the company amounting to rs. 110 lakhs, when presented within the validity period of the cheques to the bank, were returned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
t.n.r. tirumalpad, j.c.1. petitioner no. 1, neithanga hmar, was searched by p.w. 1 h.k. nag, the preventive officer of central excise and land customs at about 9-00 a.m. on 21-8-1959 when he arrived by bus at kwakeithel bazar near imphal from churachandpur. p.w. 1 had some information that smuggled gold was being brought by the said bus. petitioner no. 1 who is a subedar in the assam regiment was in his military uniform. when he was searched, it was found that underneath his uniform, he was wearing a waist-coat in which there were 30 pockets which had been stitched and when the said pockets were unstitched, it was found that each pocket contained a gold bar weighing 16 and odd tolas making in all 480 and odd tolas of gold. the gold bars were found hammered in order to prevent their place of origin being known, i.e., whether they were of indian origin or foreign origin. he made a statement ext. a-2 to the superintendent of land customs (p.w. 7), stating that his cousin zaphira hmar, petitioner no. 2, gave the said gold bars to him along with the waist-coat on 20-8-1959 at churachandpur asking him to carry the said gold to imphal and promising to take back the gold from him at imphal and that he, was not the owner of the gold and did not know whether the gold was brought from burma, or whether there was any permit from the reserve bank of india for bringing the seized gold into india.2. on 22-8-1959, petitioner no. 2 appeared in the customs office and gave the statement ext. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... (c) shall not remain in india or in any prescribed area therein;the material portion of section 14 of the foreigners act is as follows:14. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
p.c. phukan, j.1. shri santhosh kumar bhowmik is a time keeper in tripura project of the oil and natural gas commission (ongc in short) a statutory body created under the oil and natural gas commission act, 1956. on conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, shri bhowmik was found guilty of misconduct and was awarded the penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect by the disciplinary authority, project manager, ongc vide order dated january 15, 1983 (annexure-a/10 to the writ petition). the appellate authority, general manager, ongc dismissed his appeal vide order dated may 25/28, 1983 (annexure-a/16 to the writ petition).2. on being moved, this court by an order dated august 8, 1986 (annexure-a/17 to the writ petition) in c.r. no. 81/1983 quashed the order dismissing the appeal holding the same to be a non- speaking order and sent back the matter to the appellate authority for disposal afresh in accordance with law.3. the appellate authority (this time the regional director, ongc as the post of general manager was abolished in the meantime) on fresh disposal of the appeal maintained the finding of the guilt, but reduced the penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect to one of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect. shri s.k. bhowmik still felt aggrieved and approached this court for the second time in c.r. no. 143/86. the learned single judge did not interfere with the finding of guilt but quashed the punishment 'holding it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... 3 who had left his house with his wife and children reported the matter first to the panchayat president then to the s. d.o. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... commissioner, assam state election commission of panchayat election) and judgement and order dated 18/02/2014 (ajoy sarkar vs. ..... further it is submitted that panchayat act is a comprehensive one and all the procedures are categorically mentioned in the rules of the act and therefore all procedures as required to be followed in the aspect of peoples representation act need not be followed. ..... malua-srigouri gaon panchayat. 4. .....
Tag this Judgment!