Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: oriental gas company 1867 Page 100 of about 12,386 results (0.315 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Narinder Kaur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(2006)ACC688; (2006)142PLR682

..... oriental insurance company insurer of truck no.puc-5599) and manjit singh its owner have filed the present appeal against the impugned award of learned motor accidents claims tribunal, patiala dated 20.12.1985 awarding a compensation of rs. ..... resultantly, the present appeal filed by the insurance company fails and is hereby dismissed.

Zaishu Xie and anr Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... versus oriental insurance company ltd. ..... if the respondent / insurance company fails to file reply, ld. ..... respondent / insurance company shall be at liberty to file reply, if any, to the aforesaid application within two weeks from today. .....

Ramzeena and Others Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Kerala

..... respondent/3rd respondent: -------------------------------------------------- the oriental insurance company ltd. ..... on the other hand, the learned counsel for the insurance company submits that the tribunal has mistakenly m.a.c.a.no.319 of20093 taken the multiplier as 18, although the deceased was 28 years old, for whom the multiplier applicable as per the decision in sarla verma v. ..... but as rightly pointed out by the counsel for the insurance company, the multiplier applicable for a 28 years old person is 17 as per sarla varma's case (supra). ..... the respondent insurance company is directed to deposit this amount also within two months. .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Manpreet Kaur and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

fao-618-2014 (o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh fao-618-2014 (o&m) date of decision: 29.1.2014 oriental insurance company ltd...appellant versus manpreet kaur and others ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice jitendra chauhan present: mr.sanjiv pabbi, advocate for the appellant **** jitendra chauhan, j. ..... main appeal the present appeal has been filed by the insurance company, challenging the award dated 7.8.2013, passed by the learned motor accident claims tribunal, fatehgarh sahib (for short 'the tribunal').vide which a sum of rs.11,77,000/- has been awarded to the claimants, and the appellant .....

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Chandigarh Through Its Vs. Manj ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... fao no.2260 of 1995 -1- in the high court for the states of punjab and haryana at chandigarh fao no.2260 of 1995 date of decision.12.02.2014 the oriental insurance company limited, chandigarh through its manager ......appellant versus manjit kaur and others ......respondents present: mr.vinod chaudhri, advocate for the appellant. ..... the tribunal relied on the judgment in national insurance company ltd.versus sucha singh 1994(1) rrr439to hold that a genuine renewal will be taken as effective driving licence but this decision was found to be not correct law in national insurance company limited vs.swaran singh (2004) 3 scc297 however, the key question still is whether the original issue of licence was proved to be false. ..... the appeal by the insurance company was on the ground that the driver did not have a valid driving licence. .....

Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Surender Kumar and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh fao no.1662 of 2011 (o&m) decided on : 29.01.2014 oriental insurance company limited ...appellant-claimant versus surender kumar and others ...respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice ajay tewari present : mr.satpal dhamija, advocate for the appellant. ..... (oral) this appeal has been filed by the insurance company against the award dated 01.11.2010 passed by motor accident claims tribunal, kurukshetra. .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Vishal Sharma and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... f.a.o.no.5133 of 2013 (o&m) -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh f.a.o.no.5133 of 2013 (o&m) date of decision : 04.02.2014 oriental insurance company ltd.....appellant versus vishal sharma and another .....respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice ajay tewari *** present : mr.rajneesh malhotra, advocate for the appellant. *** 1. ..... the only ground taken by the learned counsel for the appellant- insurance company is that the driver of the insured vehicle had firs.produced a license purportedly issued from kurukshetra but that license did not authorize him to drive transport vehicle. ..... (oral) this appeal has been filed by the insurance company against the award dated 30.08.2013 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal, kurukshetra awarding total compensation of `3,74,291/- i.e. ..... in my opinion, that may be so and on this ground the driver may be prosecuted but it cannot be held that he was not holding a valid license and therefore the insurance company has to indemnify the owner. .....

Present: Mr. Ramesh Hooda Advocate Vs. Oriental Insurance Company

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... b.s.deshwal .......petitioner versus oriental insurance company ......respondents limited and another coram: hon'ble mrs.justice sabina present: mr.ramesh hooda, advocate for the petitioner. ..... learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner joined the insurance company as development officer with effect from 6.7.1984. ..... vide notification dated 6.4.1992, the insurance company had notified 7 posts of assistant administrative officer. ..... petitioner was working as development officer with the insurance company in the year 1992. .....

Bhupal Singh Thakur Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Ano ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... nor the revision petition itself point to any specific piece of evidence which was produced before the fora below de hors the evidence of op/oriental insurance company, showing the route permit to be a fake one. 6. ..... 9.11.2010 the counsel filed copies of the following two documents:- a) the motor claim form submitted by the complainant to the oriental insurance company and b) copy of the authority letter of 4.12.2006. ..... while dismissing the complaint, the district forum observed that the respondent insurance company has placed before us permit no.3553/006 (annexure -3) and a certificate issued ..... the national commission held that the insurance company having decided to settle the claim on non-standard basis should pay 75% instead of limiting ..... the claim was repudiated by the insurance company on the ground that the truck was being operated under an inter-state permit, which was found ..... the counsel for the insurance company contended that it could have repudiated the entire claim, but had offered to settle it for 50%, as a ..... as per the petition, the insurance company had misguided the state commission but the petition makes no attempt ..... affidavit of shri chakravorty, we are of the considered view that the insurer has established that the permit was fake and as held by the apex court in challa bharathammas (supra) case, the insurance company cannot be held liable.? 4. ..... heard mr r k bhawnani, advocate for the revision petitioner and mr a k kaul for the respondent/oriental insurance co. 5. .....

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Praveen Dubey and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... before the judicial magistrate first class, pratappur, district surguja by the respondent no.1 (complainant) on 19.05.2008, document annexure a-6 is letter dated 21.05.2008 sent by the oriental insurance company limited to the respondent no.1 (complainant), document 7 and are insurance and finance cover note etc. ..... , document annexure a-9 is letter dated 20.06.2008 sent by the oriental insurance company limited to the respondent no.1 (complainant), document annexure a-10 is intimated regarding the incident sent by manoj dubey to the police station, sadar, ambikapur, document annexure a-11 is letter dated 30.07.2008 sent by the oriental insurance company limited to the respondent no.1 (complainant), document annexure a-12 is details regarding the parts of the vehicle replaced by new ranchi engg. ..... therefore, the appeal filed by the appellant (o.p.no.1) (the oriental insurance company limited) is allowed, the impugned order dated 30.01.2013 passed by the district forum is set aside and the case is remanded back to the district forum with a direction to hear both the parties regarding the liability of the insurance company in respect of the incidents took place on 29.04.2008 and 05.06.2008. ..... the vehicle in question was insured with the appellant (o.p.no.1) (the oriental insurance company limited) for the period from 01.06.2007 to 31.05.2008. .....