Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: oriental gas company 1857 Page 2 of about 11,498 results (0.083 seconds)

The German Democratic Republic Vs. the Dynamic Industrial Undertaking ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1972Bom27; (1971)73BOMLR183; ILR1972Bom731; 1971MhLJ482

..... the oriental gas company, (1872) 8 b lr 433, the chief justice sir richard couch said :'we think that 'judgment' in clause 15 means a decision which affects the merits of the question between the parties by determining some right or liability. ..... the plaintiffs are a company carrying on business in fertilizers. .....

Raghunath Keshav Khadilkar Vs. Poona Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR675

..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng. l.r. .....

Vanichand Rajpal Vs. Lakhmichand Maneckchand

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR955

..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 bong. l.r. .....

The Oriental Gas Company Ltd. Vs. their Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1972LabIC1256; (1971)IILLJ657SC; (1972)4SCC222

..... after the references were made by the state government, the oriental gas company act, 1960 received the assent of the president on october 1, 1960. ..... these three appeals, by special leave, are directed against the award dated july 22, 1966 of the fifth industrial tribunal, west bengal, directing the appellant-company to pay two months' wages or l/3rd of the available surplus, whichever is higher, as additional bonus for the years 1956-57, 1957-58 and 1958-59.2. ..... sinha this settlement will show that for the years 1957-58 and 1958-59, the company has paid one month's basic wage as bonus taking into consideration the trading profits. ..... sinha stated that as all the records and other documents relating to the company are in possession of the government as the undertaking has been taken over, the management experienced considerable difficulty in producing evidence before the tribunal. ..... what the orders show is only a recording of the documents filed by the company which include balance-sheets, and the application of the union was only that they should have inspection of the balance-sheets and that they should have further information on certain aspects ..... in the said decision it has been held that while it is true that the claim by the workmen for adding back interest received from bank deposits cannot be rested on any work done by them for the company during the year of account, there can be no doubt that the interest has accrued to the company out of the efforts of the workers in the past. .....

Mohabir Prosad Singh and ors. Vs. Adhikari Kunwar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1894)ILR21Cal473

w. comer petheram, c.j.1. we think that in this case there is no appeal from this order, and that this appeal, consequently, must be dismissed.2. the law is correctly laid down in the judgment of the chief justice and mr. justice markby which is to be found in the justices of the peace for calcutta v. oriental gas company 8 b.l.r. 433 (452). the chief justice there says (p. 452 of the report): 'we think that 'judgment' in clause 15 means a decision which affects the merits of the question between the parties by determining some right or liability, it may be either final, or preliminary or interlocutory, the difference between them being that a final judgment determines the whole cause or suit, and a preliminary or interlocutory judgment determines only a part of it, leaving other matters to be determined.'3. that being the law, the question is, whether a refusal to exercise the discretion given by section 608 to a judge or bench of this court to order security for costs is a decision which affects the merits of any question between the parties by determining some right or liability. in our opinion such a refusal affects no right or liability by determining any question which affects the merits of the dispute between the parties in any sense. for these reasons we think that no appeal has to this court under section 15 of the letters patent, and this appeal must be dismissed with costs.

L.Ct.L.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar and anr. Vs. M.R. Krishnamurthy Chetty ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1967)2MLJ1

..... in that case the oriental gas company applied for a writ of mandamus directing the justices of the peace for calcutta to join them in referring to a judge of the court of small causes, calcutta, the determination of the amount payable as compensation to the gas company for damage occasioned to their property by the drainage works and water works carried on by the justices. ..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng.l.r. ..... the oriental gas company ltd. ..... the oriental gas company ltd. ..... the oriental gas company limited (1872) 8 beng.l.r. ..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng. l.r. ..... the oriental gas company ltd. ..... the oriental gas company ltd. ..... the oriental gas company (ltd. ..... as the justices of peace disputed the right of the gas company, the latter took out an application for the issue of a writ of mandamus against the justices of peace to join in the arbitration and a writ of mandamus was issued. ..... . the oriental gas co ..... . the oriental gas co ..... the oriental gas co. ..... the oriental gas co. ..... the oriental gas co. ..... the oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. ..... 433, a gas company which claimed some compensation against the justices of the peace for calcutta wanted the latter to join in an application for arbitration and ascertainment of the damages by a judge of the court of small causes, calcutta. ..... general gas co. .....

The Collector of Bombay Vs. Issac Penhas

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1947)49BOMLR709

..... the oriental gas company and in sonbai v. ..... the oriental gas company the principle which is propounded is as follows:32. ..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng. l.r. ..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng. l.r. ..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 beng. l.r. ..... the oriental gas company, mr. ..... the oriental gas company. ..... the oriental gas company.31. ..... the oriental gas campany, said (p. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company, limited, the position is this. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company, limited: secretary of state v. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company limited (1938) 41 bom. l.r. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company limited: secretary of state v. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company, limited (1938) 41 bom. l.r. ..... kuchwar lime and stone company, limited: secretary of state v. .....

K.G. Gafoor Vs. the Proprietor, M/S United Gas Agency, Near Sree Gujar ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

..... it was contended that the complainant failed to adhere to the safety norms and requirements while using lpg; that the complainant was using a very old rubber tube for connecting the regulator to the gas stove and that portion of the tube had tear on it; that the forensic expert did not find any defect on the regulator or cylinder; that the cylinder was supplied after proper checking and ..... there is also no dispute that the third opposite party/oriental insurance company had issued insurance policy in the name of the first opposite party/united gas agency under the lpg dealers indemnity policy. ..... admittedly, third opposite party m/s oriental insurance company ltd, is the insurer of the policy insuring the first opposite party dealer of the gas. ..... ext.b4 is the letter dated 16.11.04 issued by the third opposite party/oriental insurance company ltd. ..... a perusal of b2 lpg accident report would make it clear that the rubber tube used for connecting the gas stove to the regulator was more than 2 year old and that the said rubber tube was replaced 2 years ..... the third opposite party m/s oriental insurance company ltd. ..... it was contended that the non-closure of the gas stove was one of the reasons for gas leakage; that the case of the complainant that gas stove was closed after cooking cannot be accepted; that the gas explosion occurred not due to any reason attributable to the opposite parties 1 and 2; that the accident was not due to the faulty equipment; that the cylinders are checked before .....

Samunder Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1965Cal598,1965CriLJ713

..... the approver was an old hand in the employ of oriental gas company at (sic)diamond harbour road. ..... viii which was a part of the uniform supplied to him by the oriental gas company. ..... oriental gas company at 36 diamond harbour road in place of durwan pratap singh, approver, so that durwan pratap singh, approver, accused samunder singh and other might commit dacoity in the house and thereby committed an offence punishable under section ..... bhur singh is one of the durwans employed at the oriental gas co's office. ..... samundar singh was an employee of the gas company at 36, diamond harbour road. ..... oriental gas co. ..... the durwans aforesaid attached to the oriental gas co. ..... at a distance of nearly a quarter of a mile from the kanoria house there was a substation of the oriental gas co. ..... the approver protap singh and the aforesaid bhur singh were in the company's employ at the diamond harbour road sub-station. ..... he was introduced to the company by his father jaswant singh who worked in the place for a considerable time. ..... the company had in its service a number of durwans at the material time. ..... the company had its head office at 12a, park street and there were several sub-stations, one of which was situate at 36, diamond harbour road and within a mile of it, there was another sub-station at behala. .....

United Collieries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Engineer in Chief, South Eastern R ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964MP42; 1963MPLJ701

..... the supreme court held that there was a legal right accruing to the calcutta gas company under the agreement and that was abridged, if not destroyed, by the provisions of the west bengal oriental gas company act, 1960, and consequently the calcutta gas company had locus standi to file an application before the high court under article 226 of the constitution challenging the validity of the aforesaid act. ..... what was considered and decided in that case was that the interference with the rights given to the calcutta gas company under the agreement of management by virtue of the west bengal oriental gas company act, 1960, was valid as that act itself was validly made. ..... , under an agreement to manage the oriental gas company for a period of twenty years had been infringed by the provisions of the west bengal oriental gas company act, 1960. ..... , surguja, the railway authorities were granted permission to enter upon the area in question for the construction of the railway line on the condition that it will compensate the company, that by itself was not sufficient to impose, any binding obligation on the railway authorities to compensate the company; and that as a matter of fact the general manager of the south eastern railways had, by his letter dated the 3oth march 1963, informed the petitioner ..... there was no question at all in that case of the legality of any action taken under the terms of the agreement held by the calcutta gas company,in virendra singh v. .....