Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: oriental gas company 1857 Court: mumbai Page 3 of about 651 results (0.094 seconds)

Sep 15 1925 (PC)

Shri Goverdhanlalji Maharaj Vs. Shri Chandraprabhavati

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR1496

..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 b. l.r. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1919 (PC)

Desai Venechand Rajpal and ors. Vs. Lakhmichand Manekchand

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1920)ILR64Bom272

..... the oriental gas company (1872) 8 ben. l.r. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1962 (HC)

Sorab Dinshaji Dastoor Vs. D.P.R. Cassad and Board of Directors, Nagpu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1963Bom173; (1962)64BOMLR765; ILR1963Bom68; 1963MhLJ44

..... if, on the other hand, he thinks that there is no case for binding up, he may dispose of that part of the petition and with regard to sections 397 and 398 he would give such directions as the companies act provides, as we have just pointed out, after hearing both the company and the central government if the petition is not a composite partition and is only a petition under section 397 or 398, we suggest that a similar practice should be followed. ..... procedure of the court and the provisions of the code so far as applicable, shall apply to all proceedings under the act and those rules'.the mere fact that the two matters are separated in the companies act in the manner it is done and that rules ii enumerates as to in what matters petitions are necessary, does not, in our view, amount to 'save as provided by the act or by these rules ..... oriental gas co. ..... it is undoubtedly true, as has been observed by the learned judge, that originally as section 153-c stood in the companies act, 1913, as amended in 1936, it contained subject-matters of both sections 397 and 398, while in the present act they have been separated into two separate sections. ..... the learned counsel relies on the rules that have been framed under the companies act by the supreme court and contends that these rules give a very clear indication that it was never intended that prayers under these two sections could be combined in one application. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2015 (HC)

Nitin Vs. Ramesh and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... branch manager, oriental insurance company limited and another (2009) 13 supreme court cases 405 ..... from aforesaid evidence on record, it is clear that the work of fitting tin sheets was being done at bharat gas godown for which the appellant had given a contract to the respondent no.3. ..... he further stated that it was revealed that the work at the gas godown had been commenced without obtaining necessary permission from the concerned authorities. ..... he admitted that on 19-6-2011, work at karda rice mill as well as the gas godown was being done and the distance between both the sides was about half kilometer. ..... in his cross examination, he admitted that the work at bharat gas godown and karda rice mill was being done by the respondent no.3 as a contractor and that the deceased was engaged by him as a labourer ..... accordingly, while undertaking the work of laying tin sheets on 19-6-2011, lalchand came in touch with a live electric wire on the ceiling of the gas godown owned by the appellant and received an electric shock. ..... so also, the work had been started at the gas godown by the appellant without obtaining necessary permission. ..... it was only because the services of the deceased were engaged by the respondent no.3 that the deceased had come to the gas godown for doing the work in question. ..... the appellant who is the owner of the gas agency examined himself and stated that the deceased on his own had gone on the ceiling of the godown due to which he came in touch with a live wire and received a shock .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1953 (HC)

Aspee (India) Ltd. Vs. M.L. Dahanukar and Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1954Bom35; (1953)55BOMLR614; ILR1954Bom21

..... concerned to find out whether a party is properly represented, and if the solicitors properly represented the first defendant, company and if the retainer still continued, then it was for the solicitors and their counsel to get instructions from the ..... oriental gas ..... learned judge took the view that the retainer of the attorneys of the first defendant company had terminated by reason of the company having gone into liquidation and therefore he refused to order the plaintiffs to pay the costs ..... judge, it appears that the only reason why he has deprived the first defendant company of its costs is that at the stage when the company appeared before the learned judge it was not properly represented. ..... satisfied that on the company going into liquidation the retainer came to an end without the company revoking or cancelling that retainer, or, in other words, the authority given to the attorneys by the company to defend the action was withdrawn without the company taking any steps to withdraw the authority and merely by reason of the fact that the company went into liquidation. ..... therefore, by inference it does not cease merely on the company going into liquidation because the company as an entity is not dead, nor is it dissolved by reason of the fact that it goes into liquidation or a ..... 1952, was not a proper appearance, the suit had been filed long before that date, costs of the suit had been properly incurred by the solicitors of the company, and some other had to be made for these costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1983 (HC)

Unit Trust of India and Others Vs. Om Prakash Berlia and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas723(Bom)

..... in sub-section (1), the further shares aforesaid may be offered to any persons whether or not those persons include the persons referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1) in any manner whatsoever - (a) if a special resolution to that effect is passed by the company in general meeting, or (b) where no such special resolution is passed, if the votes cast (whether on a show of hands, or on a poll, as the case may be) in favour of the proposal contained in the resolution moved in that general meeting (including the casting ..... , 1978 and 14th day of june, 1980, (both days inclusive), by notice in writing of not less than one month given either before or during the said period of conversion and delivered at the registered office of the company accompanied by the relative debenture certificate have the right of conversion conferred under the trust deed and shall be entitled to call for the allotment to uti as the registered holder of 31,250 fully paid up equity shares ..... offered and limiting a time not being less than fifteen days from the date of the offer within which the offer, if not accepted, will be deemed to have been declined; (c) unless the articles of the company otherwise provide, the offer aforesaid shall be deemed to include a right exercisable by the person concerned to renounce the shares offered to him or any of them in favour of any other person; and the notice referred to in clause (b) shall ..... the oriental fire and general insurance co. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2015 (HC)

M/s. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... oriental insurance company limited, m/s. ..... the chairman and managing directors of the insurance companies and in public sector have also been arrayed as accused. ..... from para 15 onwards, it is alleged that the company has not clarified a discrepancy in the records and accounts ..... advocates on behalf of the accused company, this time calling upon us to pay the said amount with 18% interest, which was not demanded in the earlier notice within 7 days ..... it is a public limited company incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, 1956 and having its corporate office at the address mentioned in the cause title ..... 'l' below i received a notice dated 15.12.2005 from the accused company, signed by accused no. ..... new india assurance company limited etc. ..... united india company limited, m/s ..... 1 is promoted by general insurance corporation of india and other insurance companies being m/s. ..... i say that my wife (or i) owe no such amount to the accused company. 23. ..... 11 above, claiming this fantastic and frightening amount of rs.3,61,030/- as outstanding and payable, failing which i was threatened that u/s 13(4) of the securitisation act, my said flat will be seized, taken over and auctioned by the accused company. ..... 7 dated 30th october, 2002 came to be deposited after checking with the second respondents and they were duly encashed by the accused company. ..... the other petitioners are the executives and high level officers including chairman and managing directors of the afore-noted insurance companies. 3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1992 (HC)

Maruti Krishanji Chavan Vs. Harish Chandra Satarkar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993ACJ1200

..... to take advantage of that situation and make an adjustment of the money paid by some other insurance company under 'no fault liability' and i can succinctly point out what helps the case of the petitioner, in that section 141 reads thus:section 141. ..... has entered into correspondence with oriental insurance co. ..... the liability determined for 'no fault liability' insofar as the oriental insurance co. ..... , the law does not permit oriental insurance co. ..... dessai that the oriental insurance co. ..... 3,750/- for satisfying the 'no fault liability' claim, the oriental insurance co. ..... he, therefore, prayed to the tribunal to direct the third respondent, oriental insurance co. ..... it is common ground that the oriental insurance co. ..... 2, oriental insurance co. ..... the same company, therefore, can only adjust the sum of rs. ..... the final award now directs the same insurance company to pay a sum of rs. ..... 50,000/-against not only the present respondents, but also against the kadamba transport corporation, the driver and the insurance company, viz. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1957 (HC)

Salemahomed Haji Haroon Kably Vs. Mahomed Taher Jaffrani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1958Bom210; (1957)59BOMLR1193; ILR1958Bom306

..... oriental gas co. ..... oriental gas co. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1961 (HC)

Elphinstone Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Sondhi Sons (Private) Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1962Bom241; (1961)63BOMLR947; ILR1962Bom243

..... oriental gas co. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //