Court : Patna
..... lease and therefore were liable to pay stamp duty accordingly.6. the court has considered the submissions on behalf of the parties. section 3(c) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act. 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act') defines 'mining lease' as a lease for undertaking mining operations. 'mining operations' is defined in section ..... to he executed in form d. this distinction is home out in the rules with regard to permissible maximum duration of the leases, and area of the leases etc.8. a mineral may be in the earth or on its surface. the argument that since sand was lifted from the surface of the earth being fructus ..... leases of lands belonging to raiyats, to the petitioners. the petitioners could not exercise lease hold sovereignty to prevent others from transgressing or interfering with their settled area except when they would interfere with the sand for which the settlement had been made to the petitioners. the provisions of rule 11a and 11b were brought on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... found from the judgment of the apex court in the case of state of u.p. v. mohd. nooh reported in air 1958 sc 86, in the case of mineral development ltd. vs. state of bihar reported in air 1960 sc 468 and in the case of meenglass tea estate vs. workmen reported in air 1963 sc 1719. the ..... ors. reported in 2009(2)pljr 929 wherein it was held as follows:- 13. there is another reason for holding the impugned order of termination bad. the block development officer, by the impugned order has not only terminated petitioners from their post of panchayat/prakhand teachers, but have also directed to appoint the complainants (respondents) on the post ..... of 2006 came to be absorbed as panchayat teacher. since his absorption as panchayat teacher on 1st july 2006, his appointment came to be questioned by the block development officer at the instance of the appellant. after several rounds of litigations and representations by the appellant, under the order made by the district magistrate on 26th june 2010 .....
Tag this Judgment!