Court : Chennai
..... and company and others v. state of u.p. and others, (2016) 4 scc 663, the issue dealt with was with regard to the mines and mineral (development and regulation) act, 1957. the government order in question related to a change of policy. the change of policy was in the context of state largesse to ..... carefully examined with reference to the population which the existing law colleges serve and the need for an additional law college in the proposed location, the area where the institution facilities available, the local need, the desirability and feasibility of the location chosen for the establishment of the institution, the immediate surroundings ..... carefully examined with reference to the population which the existing law colleges serve and the need for an additional law college in the proposed location, the area where the institution facilities available, the local need, the desirability and feasibility of the location chosen for the establishment of the institution, the immediate surroundings .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... to the government, tn mmc rules are in consonance with gcd rules and as per the powers delegated to the state government under section 15 of the mines & minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 (in short, "mmdr act").4. the respondents/ quarry operators have challenged the amendments made to rule 8-a of tn mmc rules by ..... arbitrariness/unreasonableness. the court considering the validity of a subordinate legislation, will have to consider the nature, object and scheme of the enabling act, and also the area over which power has been delegated under the act and then decide whether the subordinate legislation conforms to the parent statute. where a rule is directly inconsistent with ..... up in tamil nadu. the said sub-rules (9)(g) and (9)(h) reads as under:"(g) the lessee shall remove and transport the mineral from the leasehold area only to his industry set-up in tamil nadu after obtaining transport permit from the district collector concerned or any officer authorised by him in this behalf .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... to be made applicable to the facts of the present case. that was a case relating to the mining in aravalli hills, a forest area, as per the provisions of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and the supreme court had to consider whether the mining activity up to 5 km from delhi-haryana border on haryana side ..... three phases, namely (i) 5000 houses in 2012-2013; (ii) 3000 houses in 2013-2014; and (iii) 2000 houses in 2014-2015. in respect of the infrastructure development in the area, the government has planned to spend rs.200 crores in a period of two years, as we have already referred to. while appreciating the gesture shown by the state ..... thick canopy cover. the unit has requested to exempt the conditions as 10%. however the unit shall be imposed with a condition that minimum 25% of the area shall be developed as green belt. and this shows that the tnpcb has applied its mind and having satisfied about the compliance has issued the final order of consent to operate. .....
Tag this Judgment!