Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: official trustees amendment act 1964 Court: jharkhand Page 4 of about 53 results (0.084 seconds)

Purushottam Das Ajmera Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR98b(Jhr)]

..... therefore, in this view of the matter the argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that the definition of mine as given in mines act should be adopted can not be appreciated because now the question of occupation of suit house by a mines manager does not remain material for the simple reason that the suit house falls within the mischief of ..... of the manager does not come within the mischief of the word mining, consequently it can not vest section 2(r) of the act provides the word and expressions which are not defined in the act and have been defined in this act but have been defined in the coal mines conservation, safety and development act, 1952 will have the meaning assigned to them in that act, the word mines has been defined in coking coal nationalisation ..... thereafter on 17.10.1971, the government of india by a notification in the official gazette took over the management of all coking coal mines including the said new sudamdih colliery and with the consent of the plaintiff the manager of the new sudamdih colliery was allowed to continue as a ..... it appears that by an amendment petition the plaint was allowed to be amended by which the plaintiff declared that the defendant no. ..... the case of the plaintiff is that by a registered deed of sale (ext-4) dated 19.3.1964 he had purchased 33 dismals of land in plot no. .....

Smt. Reshmi Dugar and ors. Vs. Ram Somari Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR454(Jhr)]

..... plaintiffs got the plaint amended stating inter alia that defendant no. ..... such a course would defeat the very purpose of the act which affords the facility of eviction of the tenant on the ground of reasonable requirement.14. ..... 1) trespassers, under the provisions of bihar buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1982 (building act for short). ..... section 11 of the building act provides that a tenant shall not be liable to eviction except on specified grounds. ..... relying on : [1964]1scr980 , panna lal v. ..... act can be sustained in law?3. .....

Suresh Mahto and anr. Vs. Sant Kumar Mahto

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2004Jhar44; [2003(4)JCR398(Jhr)]

..... thereof is not at all tenable in view of the fact there is no presumption of joint-ness regarding the property standing in the name of female members of the alleged joint family and section 4 of the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988 mandates that no suit to enforce any right shall lie in respect of any property alleged to be held benami against the person whose name the property is held as real owner of such property and in view of the ..... the plaintiff-appellants have also sought further relief by way of amendment of the plaint that their title and possession in respect of properties appertaining to ..... there is a clear prohibition under section 4 of the benami transaction (prohibition) act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the act) that no suit claim or action to enforce any right in respect of any properly held benami against the person in whose name the property is held or against any other person shall lie by or on behalf of a person claiming to ..... bibi sakina, air 1964 sc 1254, that :--'the appellant's claim based upon the benami nature of the transaction cannot stand because section 66 of the code of civil procedure ..... section 4 of the said act is a total prohibition against any suit based on benami transaction and therefore the plaintiffs-appellant claiming title through ram sewak mahto would not be entitled to get any decree in respect of the suit ..... 66 now stands repealed in the year 1988 by virtue of the provision contained in the benami transaction (prohibition) act. .....

Hardeo Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(3)BLJR2099; [2003(4)JCR15(Jhr)]

..... (5) under the facts and circumstances of the present case, the position of the petitioner (contractor) is that of a bailee and/or trustee in respect of the goods supplied to it for using the same in the works contract, specially because the petitioner (contractor) never became the owner of those goods ..... it could not have been the contention of the revenue prior to the 46th amendment that when the goods and materials had been supplied under a distinct and separate contract by the contractor for the purpose of construction of a building the assessment of sales tax ..... if that was the position can the states contend after the 46th amendment under which by a legal fiction the transfer of property in goods involved in a works contract was made liable to payment of sales tax that they are not governed by article 286 while ..... the government department has purchased iron, steel and cement material under section 13(1)(g) of the bihar finance act, 1981 on payment of concessional sales tax for the purpose of government use, as such the department ..... (8) under section 13(1)(g) of the bihar finance act, 1981, the government department being liable to pay sales tax @ 3% irrespective of higher rate of sales tax otherwise applicable on such sales, levy of sales tax @ 11% in respect ..... at one point of time, at the time of first sale, under the provisions of bihar finance act, 1981, the government department being the first purchaser and the department paid sales tax under section 13(1)(g) of the act, 1981. .....

Sidu Kanu Siksha Niketan Trust Through Its Chairman Mangal Murmu Vs. T ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... since the petitioner is pursuing a legal battle with the private respondent in the competent court, it is open for him to seek appropriate amendment in the pending suit, if so advised, to seek restoration of possession upon adjudication of title, ownership, possession of the property and validity of the trust deed in ..... as executive magistrate to maintain law and order with the assistance of police force in the matter of removal of unauthorized occupation of certain rooms of hostel and office of sidu kanu siksha niketan trust, baliguma, mango, jamshedpur, acting on the report of the additional collector, east singhhbum, jamshedpur vide letter dated 4570 dated 24.08.2013 and also letter of the respondent no. ..... mine haha, a renowned singer of japan and others, were thrown on the street by the state officials on the plea that the petitioner was the land grabber running the institution on the grabbed land in the name of the school without any legal or valid ..... resolution dated 12.06.2011 and 04.12.2011, board of trustees was extended by inclusion of the deponent mangal murmu, kshetra mohan tudu, sandhya kumari and mona tudu as ..... in the board of trustees was illegal. ..... two of the trustees were authorized to operate the bank ..... refers to the report of additional deputy commissioner, jamshedpur, as per which, reconstituted trust dated 30.10.2012 is genuine and is the basis for according protection to the original trustees. ..... is genuine and protection need be granted to the original trustee. .....

Ranchi Power Distribution Company Limited and Anr Vs. Jharkhand Bijli ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... state is entitled to refuse to enter into relationship with any one, yet if it does so, it cannot arbitrarily choose any person it likes for entering into such relationship and discriminate between persons similarly circumstanced, but it must act in conformity with some standard or principle which meets the test of reasonableness and non-discrimination and any departure from such standard or principle would be invalid unless it can be supported or justified on some rational and non ..... predicament, but the agreement is short of a contract within the meaning of article 299 of the constitution; (ii) where the contract entered into between the person aggrieved and the state is in exercise of a statutory power under certain act or rules framed thereunder and the petitioner alleges a breach on the part of the state; and (iii) where the contract entered into between the state and the person aggrieved is non-statutory and purely ..... have been levelled in the documents under reference with respect to irregularities in the tender process leading to loss of revenue is a baseless and unfounded allegation which would be evident from the various reports/notes issued by the officials of jseb, jinfra and the secretary, of the department of energy. ..... 1 seeking to amend the writ application by making a challenge to the letter of termination dated 06.05.2015 and the same was allowed by this court vide order dated 22.05.2015. ..... board of trustees of the port of bombay, mahabir auto stores v. .....

Kunal Anand Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioners have contended that the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... the jharkhand state housing board, finding himself in a difficult situation, fairly submitted that though the housing board is bound to sail along the state of jharkhand, it is the specific stand of the housing board that it acted in the matter pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 and subsequently, the board in its 17th meeting adopted a resolution for construction of residential houses/commercial complexes through joint venture. ..... the land in question was acquired in the year, 1964 and subsequently, it was transferred to the board and thus, the title vests in the housing ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 also. w.p. (c) ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12. ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 .....

M/S Kamla Aditya Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioners have contended that the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... the jharkhand state housing board, finding himself in a difficult situation, fairly submitted that though the housing board is bound to sail along the state of jharkhand, it is the specific stand of the housing board that it acted in the matter pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 and subsequently, the board in its 17th meeting adopted a resolution for construction of residential houses/commercial complexes through joint venture. ..... the land in question was acquired in the year, 1964 and subsequently, it was transferred to the board and thus, the title vests in the housing ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 also. w.p. (c) ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12. ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 .....

Simplex Infrastructures Limite Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioners have contended that the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... the jharkhand state housing board, finding himself in a difficult situation, fairly submitted that though the housing board is bound to sail along the state of jharkhand, it is the specific stand of the housing board that it acted in the matter pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 and subsequently, the board in its 17th meeting adopted a resolution for construction of residential houses/commercial complexes through joint venture. ..... the land in question was acquired in the year, 1964 and subsequently, it was transferred to the board and thus, the title vests in the housing ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 also. w.p. (c) ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12. ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 .....

Excel Venture Construction Co. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioners have contended that the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... the jharkhand state housing board, finding himself in a difficult situation, fairly submitted that though the housing board is bound to sail along the state of jharkhand, it is the specific stand of the housing board that it acted in the matter pursuant to the decision taken in the meeting held on 05.10.2005 and subsequently, the board in its 17th meeting adopted a resolution for construction of residential houses/commercial complexes through joint venture. ..... the land in question was acquired in the year, 1964 and subsequently, it was transferred to the board and thus, the title vests in the housing ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 also. w.p. (c) ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12. ..... by filing an amendment application which was allowed, the petitioner has impugned, order contained in letter dated 19.10.2012 and order dated 12.12.2012 .....