Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: official trustees act 1913 section 33 repeals Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 1 of about 1 results (0.039 seconds)

Apr 22 2008 (TRI)

P.S. Bisht Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... have no reason to doubt the veracity of this letter because this is official correspondence written by the general manager with reference to the visit made by dy ..... by his aforesaid acts of omissions and commissions, shri prem singh bisht, udc failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner unbecoming of an employee of the central board of trustees in violation of rule 3(1), (i), (ii) & (iii) of ccs (conduct) rules, 1964 which are mutatis mutandis applicable to him by virtue of regulation 27 of the epf (staff and condition of service) regulation, ..... was clearly mentioned therein that it was sutikshan suyal who was preparing and submitting all the records pertaining to pf as he was working as consultant with the company, therefore, charge was based on this information given in official capacity from one office to the other.20. ..... by his aforesaid acts of omissions and commissions, shri prem singh bisht, udc failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and conducted himself in a manner unbecoming of an employee of the central board of trustees in violation of rule 3(1),(i), (ii) & (iii) of ccs (conduct) rules, 1964 which are mutatis mutandis applicable to him by virtue of regulation 27 of the epf (staff and condition of service) regulation, ..... as was told to him by the officials and not anand suyal, therefore, it is clear that anand suyal did not prepare the returns of above said ..... furtive nature of this act is also indicative of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2003 (TRI)

Yatendra Singh Jafa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ185CAT

..... he had been discriminated against in that while he has been recommended to be dealt with under article 311(2)(c), dig, bsf had been dealt with under section 20 of the act, giving him an opportunity to explain his case, which has in fact enabled him to continue in service, in spite of the order of removal ..... presence of the applicant in the court of inquiry was enforced despite his shattered physical health and the mental depression; (b) the inquiry was gone through in terms of the provisions of bsf act and rules which could not have been made applicable to the applicant; (c) during the inquiry, though some of the documents like statements were shown to the applicant, but the statements ..... , the interim relief granted against respondent no.3, on the aspect of eviction of the applicant from the official quarter, is made absolute and the applicant is permitted to continue in the quarter in the ..... maharashtra -- have confined their arguments only to the vacation of the official quarter allotted to the applicant, as he had been dismissed from service (this is of not much relevance as the applicant has been protected against eviction of the official quarters by the interim order dated 22.3.2001, which has been extended ..... respondents 1 and 2 and that the tribunal had already granted the applicant relief against his claim against wishes of the applicant from the official quarters till the disposal of the case ..... persons were officially handed over ..... be available, as most of them bsf officials themselves .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2006 (TRI)

Anil Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ63CAT

..... principles of natural justice, though cannot be put in the straight jacket formula, yet its applicability, more particularly the principles of audi alterampartem, is the condition precedent before any adverse material is concluded and acted against a government servant.though crs under rules, 1970 ibid do not prescribe such an opportunity, yet by implication of law and also as an implied applicability of principles of natural justice, such an opportunity was a condition precedent. ..... but, when applied to public functionaries, it means a power or right conferred upon them by law, of acting officially in certain circumstances according to the dictates of their own judgment and conscience, uncontrolled by the judgment or conscience of other. ..... no doubt, under the rules of 1970 ibid, the accepting authority would not act as a rubber stamp by only counter signing the remarks or the grading but is at liberty on modification to record his reasoning and once it is adverse, the same has to be indicated as such. ..... as a quasi-judicial authority or even administrative authority, a functionary on administrative side, when acts in discharge of its entrusted duties, no doubt, the exercise has to be on a discretionary power vested in the authorities, yet it has to be exercised in a judicious manner. ..... 4, to which the learned counsel for official respondents makes a statement that he is defending respondent no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2006 (TRI)

R.D. Bohet S/O Sh. Bhoop Singh, Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi, Govt. of Nc ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... us advert to the background and reasoning recorded by the disciplinary authority.admittedly, a sting operation conducted by the aaj tak news channel showing apart from applicant other officials allegedly demanding and accepting bribe or illegal gratification the video cd played and the video clipping shown indicates that applicant is standing at the counter of the canteen ..... is no blanket refusal of the owners of the aaj tak in the matter of deposition of their journalists and reporters as in the erstwhile sting operation conducted in case of a police official in the case of sub inspector sobhen baraik a summary of allegations issued under rule 16 of the delhi police (punishment & appeal) rules, 1980 by the assistant commissioner of police, ..... sections 70 and 71(xxiv) the government has been empowered to make rules to carry out any provision of this act, including recruitment, punishment and as no rules have been framed repealed provisions under section 73 notwithstanding the repeal act of 18 of 1994 regulations made under the prisons act of 1984 section 73 punjab jail department executive staff (punishment & appeal) rules, 1943 define government as provincial government under section ..... can come in disciplinary proceedings it is highly illogical that in a case where video recording has been done in sting operation in tihar jail the officials have refused to come under the guise and pretext which is far from justifiable clearly rules a presumption and there is no hesitation for us to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //