Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: officer or employees Sorted by: recent Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 2,505 results (0.030 seconds)

Khurshid Alam Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its

Court : Jharkhand

..... the petitioner was doing repair work without informing the electricity department and at that time no officer and employee of the electricity department was present and the petitioner was also not the worker of the electricity department.6. ..... the petitioner was never employee of the electricity department at the time of work was carried out by private elect. ..... officio commissioner under workman compensation act cum presiding officer, labour court, deoghar dated 25.06.2008.5. ..... the state of jharkhand through its chief secretary office at secretariat, p.o.+p.s. .....

Sukhuwa Oraon Vs. Jharkhand Gramin Bank and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... nikunja bihari patnaik, it is no defence available to say that there was no loss or profit resulted in case, when the officer/employee acted without authority. ..... good conduct and discipline are inseparable from the functioning of every officer/employee of the bank. ..... every officer/employee of the bank is required to take all possible steps to protect the 7 interests of the bank and to discharge his duties with utmost integrity, honesty, devotion and diligence and to do nothing which is unbecoming of a bank officer. ..... passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice that too ex-parte without giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to defend himself which is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india and ranchi kshetriya gramin bank (officer and employees) service regulation, 2000. ..... the brief facts as disclosed in the writ application, is that the petitioner while continuing as scale 1 officer on the bank, an explanation was called for on 14.12.2004 regarding irregularities in disbursement of loan to 65 borrowers at kanke branch vide annexure-1 to the writ application. ..... the very discipline of an organisation more particularly a bank is dependent upon each of its officers and officers acting and operating within their allotted sphere. .....

Hari Bansh Lal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... that during the pendency of the writ petition an advertisement was got published in a daily news paper dainik bhaskar on 13.09.2015 from the office of the principal secretary, energy department, government of jharkhand vide notification no.1/board/-01-urja-26/2013 (khand) 2164 dated 24.08.2015 inviting applications from the eligible candidates for the post of chairman- cum-managing director, jharkhand ..... , the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 repealed by section 185; section 131 deals with the vesting of property of board in the state government and the provisions relating to officer and employee. .....

Rajendra Prasad Sah Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... that the deponent states and submits that the second enquiry is legal, proper, valid and within the competency/jurisdiction and in accordance with the regulation of bank of india officer employees (discipline & appeal) regulation 1976 and has been conducted after following due procedure and the rules of natural justices as such there is nothing to be interferred into. ..... that it is further stated and submitted that in terms of the regulation 7 of bank of india officer employees (discipline & appeal) regulations 1976, that the disciplinary authority can refer the matter to the inquiring authority for 3 further enquiry. ..... as per the regulation 7 of bank of india officer employees (discipline & appeal) regulation 1976, disciplinary authority is empowered to remit back the case to the inquiring authority for fresh or further enquiry. ..... the disciplinary authority vide order dated 27.7.2000 has ordered for further enquiry in the matter after recording the reasons in terms of regulation 7 of bank of india officer's employees (discipline & appeal) regulations 1976. ..... inquiring authority & staff officer, manager, bhagalpur 7. .....

Kapura Mandal @ Kapural Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand,

Court : Jharkhand

..... plain reading of section 75 as well as section 2(2) of the forest act, quoted herein above, it appears that such permission of the state government is required for any officer or employee of the forest department for doing trade in timber or other forest produce. ..... learned counsel, section 75 of the indian forest act does not restrict any of the relative of a forest officer/employee from doing the lawful business of running saw mills.according to mr. ..... i also do not find any provision under bihar saw mills regulation act 1990 which restricts any relative of the forest employee or forest officer from doing business of saw mills.further the provisions of bihar government service conduct rules is also not applicable to the petitioner as she is not ..... in the present case since the petitioner is neither a forest officer nor an employee of the forest department and, therefore, such permission as envisaged under section 75 of the forest act was not required for her.only because the husband of the petitioner is employed as an assistant/clerk in the ..... 75 of the indian forest act only prohibits a forest officer or a forest employee from doing any business in respect of timber or forest produce, whereas the petitioner is neither a forest officer nor she is employed in the forest department. ..... of section 75 of the act it does not appear that the intention of the legislature was to restrain any of the relative of the forest employee/forest officer from doing trade in timber or other forest produce. .....

State Election Commission Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR100(Jhr)]

..... clause 2 prohibits transfer and posting of even those officers and employees who are not connected with election work without its prior permission. ..... (2) subject to the provisions of any law made by the legislature of a state the conditions of service and tenure of office of the state election commissioner shall be such as the governor may by rule determine:provided that the state election commissioner shall not be removed from his office except in like manner and on the like ground as a judge of a high court and the conditions of service of the state election commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his ..... clause 3 of the model code of conduct puts a ban on appointment of officer and employees in all the departments. ..... we are therefore, of the view that the respondents-state should, at least, depute 25 officers as observers for the purpose of holding free and fair elections of municipalities and municipal corporations.12. ..... government of jharkhand, ranchi under the direction of the state government, whereby demand of the commission for deputing 35 officers of the rank of joint secretary as observers has been turned down. ..... learned counsel submitted that sections 19-a and 19-b of the jharkhand municipal act clearly confers power to the commission to ask for deputation of officers to conduct the elections apart from the constitutional provisions. .....

Tileshwar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1030; [2007(3)JCR178(Jhr)]

..... interest in any firm or company earning on the business of manufacture, sale or hire of machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus or fittings for the treatment of a sewage or trade effluents, or(f) is a director or a secretary, manager or other salaried officer or employee of any company or firm having any contract with the board, or with the government constituting the board, or with a local authority in the state, or with a company or corporation owned, controlled or managed by the government, for the ..... useful to reproduce the proviso, wherein, power was exercised.provided also that a member nominated under this section, whether before or after february 15, 1990 shall hold office during the pleasure of the state government but not beyond the term of the board.the apex court while upholding the validity of this proviso also approved the removal ..... be filled by a fresh nomination and the person nominated to fill the vacancy shall hold office only for the remainder of the term for which the member in whose place he was ..... (4) a member of a board, other than the member-secretary, may, at any time, resign his office by writing under his hand addressed-(a) in the case of chairman, to the central government or as the case may be, the state government; and(b) in any other case, to the chairman of the ..... be, the state government may, if it thinks fit remove any member of a board before the expiry of his term of office, after giving, him a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the same. .....

Mahamaya Chemicals Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar61; 2007(2)BLJR876; [2007(1)JCR555(Jhr)]

..... (i) indisciplined behaviour with any officer or employee of the concerned department. ..... this blacklisting order has been passed on the ground that the representative of the petitioner entered into the office of the executive engineer, drinking water & sanitation division, hatia project, ranchi without permission and attempted to destroy the papers lying on the table of the officer and also misbehaved with the executive engineer, drinking water & sanitation division, hatia project, ranchi and threatened to kill him. ..... (public works department) due to any of the following category of corruption by a contractor or any partner of a registered firm or by any director or any technical employee or any of the authorized representative of a private public committee company, personally, may be put under black list. ..... 7, who is the executive engineer, drinking water & sanitation division, hatia project, ranchi and this officer has been impleaded as a party by name but primarily impugned orders has been assailed being in contravention of the provisions of bihar public works department code and violation of principles of natural justice. ..... (iii) for creating law and order problem in the government office at the time of receiving tender papers or producing tender papers or any work connected with it.rule 14. ..... - the final decision shall be taken by the competent registering officers of a particular class/rank only after issuing show cause notice for blacklisting any contractor of a particular class.3 .....

Ashoke Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(3)JCR171(Jhr)]

..... bar to pension to certain officers of the zila parishad - no officer or employee or servant, appointed by a zila parishad, who does not hold a pensionable post on the date the zila parishad takes charge of office for the first time, shall be entitled to a pension:provided that such an officer, employee or servant shall be entitled to the benefits of contributory provident fund and gratuity according to rules ..... of service of the officers or employees of a district board appointed to their respective posts under the zila parishad in accordance with the proviso to sub-section 93) of section 50, shall continue to be the same as before such appointments or, if they so opt within a period of four months from the said date, shall subject to the provisions of rule 9, become the same as those of officers of similar category in ..... all appoints by promotion to the posts of ministerial officers shall be made on the recommendation of the committee referred to in sub-rule (4):provided that the primary considerations for selection for promotion shall be merit, technical qualification and knowledge and integrity; seniority may be considered only thereafter;provided further that where a senior employee is proposed to be superseded, the committee shall ..... rules made there under and also jharkhand act 2001, it is clear that the right conferred to the employees of zila parishad to be treated as state government employees has not bee taken away by subsequent legislation or the rules made thereunder. .....

Ganesh Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004(2)BLJR1035; [2004(2)JCR443(Jhr)]; [2004]55SCL662(Jhar)

..... having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel, the only question that falls for consideration is whether an officer or employee of a company whose services has been terminated can be brought under the mischief of the provision of companies act ..... their lordships observed :'section 630 of the act which makes the wrongful withholding of any property of a company by an officer or employee of the company a penal offence, is typical of the economy of language which is characteristic of the draughtsman of the ..... (2) the court trying the offence may also order such officer or employee to deliver up or refund, within a time to be fixed by the court, knowingly misapplied or in default to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years ..... would be noticed that clause (b) also make it an offence if any officer or employee of a company having any property of the company in his possession knowingly applies it to purposes other than those expressed or directed in the articles and authorised by the act, that would primarily apply to the present officers and employees and may also include past officers and employees. ..... first of these is the one contemplated by clause (a), namely, where an officer of employee of a company wrongfully obtains possession of any property of the company during the course of his employment to which he is not ..... is therefore no warrant to give a restrictive meaning to the term 'officer or employee' appearing in sub-section (1) of section 630 of the act. .....