Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: officer or employees Sorted by: old Page 3 of about 203,271 results (0.090 seconds)

Feb 23 1909 (FN)

Hammond Packing Co. Vs. Arkansas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... said court shall proceed to render judgment by default against said corporation, joint stock association, or copartnership, and it is further provided, that, in case any officer, agent, employee, director, or representative of any corporation, joint stock association, or copartnership in such proceeding, as hereinbefore mentioned, who shall reside or be found within this state, shall be subpoenaed to appear and testify or to produce books, papers, and ..... of the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, to strike out the answer, motion, reply, demurrer, or other pleading then or thereafter filed in said action or proceeding by the said corporation, joint stock association, or copartnership, whose officer, agent, director, or employee has neglected or failed to attend and testify and produce all books, papers, and documents he or they shall have been ordered to produce in said action by the court or person authorized to take said testimony, and ..... the visitorial powers of a state over corporations doing business within it borders, it is competent for it to compel such corporations to produce their books and papers for investigation and to require the testimony of their officers and employees to ascertain whether its laws have been complied with, and this power extends to the production of books and papers kept outside of the state, and a statute requiring such production does not amount to an unreasonable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1909 (FN)

Siler Vs. Louisville and Nashville R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... they shall give the company or corporation complained of not less than ten days' notice, by letter mailed to an officer or employee of said company or corporation, stating the time and place of the hearing of same, also the nature of the complaint or matter to be investigated, and shall hear such statements, argument, or evidence offered ..... , collect, or receive a greater or higher rate, toll, or compensation for like services thereafter rendered than that made and fixed by said commission as herein provided, said company or corporation, and said officer, agent, or employee shall each be deemed guilty of extortion, and, upon conviction, shall be fined for the first offense in any sum not less than $500, nor more than $1,000, and, upon a second ..... the rate, toll, or compensation so fixed by the commission shall be entered and be an order on the record book of their office and signed by the commission, and a copy thereof mailed to an officer, agent, or employee of the railroad company or corporation affected thereby, and shall be in full force and effect at the expiration of ten days thereafter, and may be revoked or modified by ..... * "an act to prevent railroad companies or corporations owning and operating a line or lines of railroad, and its officers, agents, and employees, from charging, collecting, or receiving extortionate freight or passenger rates in this commonwealth, and to further increase and define the duties and powers of the railroad commission in reference thereto, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1910 (FN)

Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Kansas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... " "any officer or employee of such railroad company who shall violate any of the provisions or conditions of 1 of this act shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be fined in any sum not less than ten nor more than ..... 269 now receiving, and it has been represented to the board of officers of said company that the respondent is constructing motor cars for establishment on its branch lines that can be operated at a much less expense than steam service. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1911 (FN)

Wilson Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... said letter press copy books have been and still are in my possession, custody and control, and as against any other officer or employee of said corporation, or any other person, i have been entitled to such possession, custody and control. ..... you appear before the grand inquest of the body of the people of the united states of america for the southern district of new york, at a circuit court to be held in the united states court house and post office building, borough of manhattan, city of new york, on the 10th day of october, 1910, at 11 o'clock in the forenoon, and that you produce at the time and place aforesaid, the following: letter press copy ..... books of the institution or of any officer or employee thereof. ..... said letter press copy books for the months of may and june, 1909, in said subpoena mentioned during said months of may and june, 1909, were kept regularly in my office as president of said corporation, and were regularly used by me and, for the most part, if not entirely, by me only, and contained copies of my personal and other correspondence, as well as copies of the correspondence relating to ..... and did not require the person addressed "to testify generally" in behalf of the united states, and because it was not issued pursuant to an order of court, was addressed to the corporation without mention of any individual or officer, and would not apprise the defendant in the prosecution which might follow of the name of the precise witness who might have appeared against him. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1915 (FN)

Coppage Vs. Kansas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that it shall be unlawful for any individual or member of any firm, or any agent, officer, or employee of any company or corporation to coerce, require, demand, or influence any person or persons to enter into any agreement, either written or verbal, not to join or become or remain a member of any labor organization or association as a ..... 7 agent, officer, or employee of any company or corporation violating the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not less than fifty dollars or ..... 370), had enacted "that any employer subject to the provisions of this act, and any officer, agent, or receiver of such employer, who shall require any employee, or any person seeking employment, as a condition of such employment, to enter into an agreement, either written or verbal, not to become or ..... question of the validity of the particular provision in the act of congress making it a crime against the united states for an agent or officer of an interstate carrier to discharge an employee from its service because of his being a member of a labor organization. ..... and the question before the court declared to be: "may congress make it a criminal offense against the united states, as by the tenth of the act of 1898 it does, for an agent or officer of an interstate carrier, having full authority in the premises from the carrier, to discharge an employee from service simply because of his membership in a labor organization? .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1915 (FN)

United States Vs. Holte

Court : US Supreme Court

..... but a conspiracy with an officer or employee of the government or any other for an offense that only he could commit has been held for many years to fall within the conspiracy section, now 37, of the penal code. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1915 (FN)

Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Vs. Missouri Ex Rel. Jones

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or premium to be paid for insuring property against loss or damage by fire, lightning or storm, and that it has not issued and does not own any trust certificates, and for any corporation, agent, officer or employee, or for the directors or stockholders of any corporation, has not entered into and is not now in any combination, contract or agreement with any person or persons, corporation or corporations, or with any stockholder ..... must be construed in the light of 10306, found in article i of the same chapter, which declares: "it shall not be lawful for any corporation to issue or to own trust certificates, or for any corporation, agent, officer or employee, or the directors or stockholders of any corporation, to enter into any combination, contract or agreement with any person or persons, corporation or corporations, or with any stockholder or director thereof, the purpose and effect of which combination ..... (1) it is insisted that the statute is repugnant to the "due process" clause, in that it requires an oath of the corporation's officer that the corporation "has not issued and does not own any trust certificates," without explaining or defining the term "trust certificates," or otherwise indicating the meaning of the ..... the filing of an affidavit on the ground that the prescribed form in the statute is not exactly adapted to every corporation and that the state officers have construed the statute as not permitting any alterations are too frivolous to need serious attention. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1915 (FN)

United States Vs. Barnow

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the district court held that the gist of the offense is the false personation of an officer or employee of the united states, and, in order to constitute such an offense, there must be personation of some particular person or class of persons, since there cannot be a false personation of a supposititious individual who never existed or whose class ..... section, these offenses are prohibited: (1) with intent to defraud either the united states or any person, the falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the united states or any department, or any officer of the government thereof, and taking upon oneself to act as such. ..... not doubting that a false personation of a particular officer or employee of the government, or a false pretense of holding an office or employment that actually exists in the government of the united states, is within the denunciation of 32, we think it has a ..... to defraud, and by falsely assuming or pretending to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the united states, the accused shall, in the pretended character, have demanded or obtained any money, paper, document, or other valuable thing, the offense is complete notwithstanding some valuable consideration was offered or given by the pretended employee for that which he demanded or obtained. ..... -- indicate an intent to punish only false personation of existing officers or employees, and not a false representation as to some supposititious employment .....

Tag this Judgment!

1916

Georgia Vs. Tennessee Copper Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... these records, verified by the oath of a responsible officer or employee of the defendant, shall be reported to the clerk of this court immediately after the end of each calendar month. 4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1916 (FN)

Home Bond Co. Vs. Mcchesney

Court : US Supreme Court

..... it appeared that, during the continuance of the contracts between the petitioner and the chair company and the reed company respectively, manning was an officer and employee of the respective companies; that for all services rendered by him while so employed by these companies, including such as he page 239 u. s. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //