Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: officer or employees Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 152 results (0.016 seconds)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Vidyut Carbon Products Pvt. ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)IIILLJ663UC

..... 1994 written by the authorised officer of employee state insurance corporation, kanpur to the recovery officer, employee state insurance, kanpur for recovery ..... dependants of the insured person claims or claim that benefit in accordance with the regulations made in that behalf within a period of twelve months after the claim became due or within such further period as the employees' insurance court may allow on grounds which appear to it to be reasonable;(b) the cause of action in respect of a claim by the corporation for recovering contributions (including interest and damages) from the principal ..... decision of a medical board or a medical appeal tribunal has not been obtained on the same and the decision of such question is necessary for the determination of the claim or question before the employees' insurance court, that court shall direct the corporation to have the question decided by this act and shall thereafter proceed with the determination of the claim or question before it is accordance with ..... or any other person, in exercising his functions or discharging his duties under section 45, the corporation may, on the basis of information available to it, by order, determine the amount of contributions payable in respect of the employees of that factory or establishment:provided that no such order shall be passed by the corporation unless the principal or immediate employer or the person in charge of the factory or establishment has been given a reasonable opportunity or being .....

F.R.i. (Salary Earners), Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. Presiding Office ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... through a member, past member or deceased member, and the society, its committee of management or any officer, agent or employee of the society, including any past officer, agent or employee; or (c) between the society or its committee and any past committee, any officer, agent or employee or any past officer, past agent or past employee or the nominee, heir or legal representative of any deceased officer, deceased agent, or deceased employee of the society; or (d) between a co-operative society and any other co-operative society or societies; ..... thus, sub-clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 70, specifically provides that any dispute between the society or employee arises, the same shall be referred to the registrar for action and no court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or other proceeding in respect of any such dispute, other than a dispute regarding ..... 1960 the registrar or any officer appointed by him not below the rank of assistant registrar, has jurisdiction to decide the dispute relating to disciplinary action and as such decision is binding on the society and its employees. ..... others(supra), the petitioner, an employee of the cooperative society was dismissed ..... at hand the dispute between the society and the employee was with regard to payment of d.a. ..... and the employees had moved application before the assistant registrar of the society and the said application/case was rejected by the assistant registrar, hence in view of above provision, the decision of the .....

Gajendra Singh Rautela and Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... order whereby the state government granted one months extra salary to the non-gazetted officers and employees of the police department. 4. ..... the respondents continued to pay said salary to the petitioners till 23rd june, 2006 on which date, an order was passed by the financial comptroller of police headquarter, dehradun asking the officer concerned to discontinue payment of one months extra salary to the petitioners and further to recover the amount which has already paid to them. ..... moreover, the petitioners are regular employees of uttarakhand police and they have been sent on deputation in c.b.cid. .....

Surendra Singh Parmar Vs. Alaknanda GramIn Bank

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC651(UHC); 2006(3)SLJ414(NULL)

..... addanki babu manu/sc/0425/1998 : (1999)illj754sc , read with regional rural banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees), rules 1998, makes it clear that expression 'seniority-cum-merit' once the bench mark is cleared, the senior even though less meritorious shall have priority and a comparative assessment of merit is not required to be ..... as discussed above, in the third schedule of regional rural banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees) rules, 1998 it is expressly made clear that promotion shall be made on 'seniority-cum ..... 2, mentioned in the third schedule of regional rural banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees), rules 1998, clearly provides that the promotion shall be made on the basis of ..... specifically stated that the regional rural bank (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees) rules 1998, have been followed in the impugned promotions. ..... revolves round the point of interpretation of 'seniority-cum-merit' mentioned in the regional rural banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees) rules, 1998. ..... the petitioners in the present case, for the reason that in the case of cauuery gramina bank, the promotions were held prior to enforcement of the regional rural banks (appointments and promotion of officers and other employees), rules 1998. ..... bank is included in second schedule of the regional rural banks (appointment and promotion of officers and other employees), rules 1998. .....

Madan Mohan Kukreti Vs. Geeta Bhawan and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr32

..... from the oral as well as documentary evidence and also from the letter dated 18-10-1991, filed by the defendant/appellant before the lower appellate court, what appears is this that the defendant, since was employee as technical officer (ayurvedic) and to facilitate him to discharge his functions he was provided accommodation in the geeta bhawan. ..... it was pleaded by the defendant that sri chiranji lal, manager of the geeta bhawan has no knowledge of the ayurvedic medicines and as a technical officer he (defendant) made certain advises to him which the manager did not like and ultimately issued a show cause notice dated 8-3-1996 terminating his services. ..... as such, in the opinion of this court, mere deduction of a particular sum from the salary of an employee in lieu pf the accommodation provided to him by the employer cannot be said to be a lease unless there is an intention to create an interest, in the property. in c.m. ..... that being so, the relationship between the employer and employee in connection with the occupation of the premises in question was that of a licensor and licensee and not that of a lessor and lessee. ..... admittedly, the defendant/appellant was appointed as technical officer by the plaintiff/respondent in geeta bhawan to assist in manufacturing of ayurvedic medicines. ..... on 19-1-1990, defendant/appellant was appointed as technical officer and to facilitate him to discharge his functions in the said capacity, he was allowed to stay in aforementioned rooms as a licensee .....

Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Chief Officer, State Bank of I ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Uttranchal)340; [2006]285ITR321(Uttaranchal)

..... whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned income-tax appellate tribunal was legally, justified in holding that no perquisite arose on account of concessional accommodation facility provided by the employer to its employees and the assessing officer was not justified in charging interest under section 201/201(1a) of the income-tax act ?5. ..... 'the cit (appeals)'), by which the appeals were decided in favour of the assessee.3 the brief facts are that, the assessing authority on scrutiny of the annual return of salaries filed by the assessee before the assessing officer noticed that many of the employees were not paid house rent allowance whereas some were paid. ..... the other employees who had no concessional accommodation were paying the rent and the other officers to whom the concessional accommodation had been arranged by the assessee if they are paying the same rent to the assessee which other employees are paying, it cannot be said that it is a perquisite within the meaning of section 17. ..... employees similarly situated made payment of rent in the same manner and to the same extent and the assessee took the plea that no concession was enjoyed by any employee within the meaning of section 17 of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and no deductions were made by the assessing officer. .....

Cit Vs. Chief Officer, Zonal Officer, State Bank of India

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2006]155TAXMAN477(NULL)

..... the value of any benefit or amenity granted or provided free of cost or at concessional rate in any of the following cases:(a) by a company to an employee who is a director thereof;(b) by a company to an employee being a person who has a substantial interest in the company;(c) by any employer (including a company) to an employee to whom the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subclause do not apply and whose income under the head 'salaries' (whether due from, or paid ..... itat was legally, justified in holding that no perquisite arose on account of concessional accommodation facility provided by the employer to its employees and the assessing officer was not justified in charging interest under section 201/201(1a) of the income tax act ?'5. ..... of salaries filed by the assessee before the assessing officer noticed that many of the employees were not paid house rent allowance whereas some were ..... the other employees who had no concessional accommodation were paying the rent and the other officers to whom the concessional accommodation had been arranged by the assessee if they are paying the same rent to the assessee which other employees are paying, it cannot ..... employees similarly situated made payment of rent in the same manner and to the same extent and the assessee took a plea that no concession was enjoyed by any employee within the meaning of section 17 of the income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and no deductions were made by the assessing officer .....

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer, ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2574(UHC)

..... --(1) recruitment to various categories of posts in the service shall be made from one or more of the following sources as decided by the board from time to time : (a) by direct recruitment ;(b) by promotion from amongst corporation employees as have put in at least 3 years service in the next lower post through a departmental test or interview in any other manner prescribed by the board from time to time ;(c) by deputation or on contract. ..... state road transport corporation employees (other than officers) service regulations, 1981. ..... (3) subject to such direction as may be given by the board, employees possessing requisite qualification shall also be entitled to compete in direct recruitment.12. ..... the question before this court is that whether the labour court was legal in holding and directing that workmen (class iv employees) be given designation and pay scale of junior clerk8. mr. a.n. ..... as such from amongst the class iv employees one could have been recruited from class iv to class iii through departmental examination also, but the concerned workmen have not been recruited through departmental examination.11. ..... in fact, what the learned presiding officer of the labour court has done is that he has permitted the recruitment in class iii bypassing the rules and regulations including the ones relating to reservation of scheduled castes and backward classes. ..... state road transport corporation employees service regulations, 1981. ..... 2, a union of the roadways employees, in writ petition no. .....

Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. L ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2004)189CTR(Uttranchal)91; [2003]264ITR328(Uttaranchal)

..... (2) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned income-tax appellate tribunal was legally correct in holding that no perquisite arose on account of free accommodation facility provided by the employer to its employees and the assessing officer was not justified in charging interest under section 201/201(1a) of the income-tax act ? ..... they are as follows :questions : '(1) whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned income-tax appellate tribunal was legally justified in holding that free accommodation facility provided by the employer to its employees on board the rig in high seas cannot be construed to be perquisite ? ..... , the assessee, was charged with interest under section 201(1a) of the income-tax act, 1961, for short payment of tax deducted at source from the salary of its employee for the assessment year 1994-95. ..... being aggrieved by the order of the assessing officer, the said assessee went in appeal to the commissioner of income-tax (appeals). ..... on that notice the assessing officer passed an order on july 21, 1999, under section 201(1a) of the income-tax act charging interest on hyundai heavy industries co. ..... the order of the assessing officer was confirmed and the appeal was dismissed. .....

Chairman of District Cane Service Authority Vs. Mohd. Usman Ikramul Ha ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR217]; (2005)2UPLBEC49

..... the plain english translation of this would be as under ;'the hon'ble governor is pleased to enhance the age of retirement from 58 to 60 years of the employees/officers of district co-operative banks, apex cooperative societies and other cadres service and also the employees of the banks and other undertakings.'5. ..... it was his case that owing to a government order dated 26.2.2003, the retiring age of the employees like him, had been increased from 58 to 60 years. ..... the writ petition was filed by one of the employees of the appellant society, as he was sought to be retired at the age of 58 years. ..... and the employees therein would be benefited depriving the employees of the other classes of co-operative societies of that benefit. ..... judge we find that the learned single judge was dealing with the same argument and in that the learned judge held that the very definition of the term 'registrar' was inclusive of all the officers working in all kinds of co-operative societies. ..... the list of the officers, to whom the copy was directed to be sent for information has got nothing to do and has no nexus with the real import of the g.o. .....