Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: north bengal university act 1981 Court: andhra pradesh Page 23 of about 222 results (0.071 seconds)

Jan 24 2012 (HC)

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by Its Dy Vs. Protection of Plant Varie ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... court observed on facts that the cause of action arose upon the cancellation of the registered design of the appellant in the state of west bengal and held that the delhi high court had no jurisdiction in the matter on account of the impact of such cancellation being felt within ..... given the ubiquitous and far reaching effects of the activities of the competent authority in exercise of its functions and the fetters placed thereon under the act and the rules framed thereunder, we are unable to agree with the learned single judge that no part of the cause of action arose within the ..... writ petition no.16892 of 2010 before this court assailing the action of the competent authority and the union of india in not implementing the provisions of the act in terms of conducting proper tests of the plant varieties sought to be registered and causing publication of advertisements as per the prescribed format. ..... more appropriate to hear and determine the claim in respect of which the action was brought within the jurisdiction (david chong gek sian, senior lecturer, faculty of law, national university of singapore, in his paper on 'forum conveniens'10. ..... principle is now of universal application and is firmly embedded ..... when the consequences of the registration of a plant variety are explicitly spelt out by the act and the rules framed thereunder and the objector to such registration, who is clothed with the statutory right of access to full data of the plant variety to be registered and of having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2012 (HC)

Kone Elevator India Private Limited Rep. Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... up and ors1 and contended that when once an employee voluntarily resigns and the same has been accepted by the petitioner, such an act falls within the first exclusion clause to the definition of the term `retrenchment' and hence the labour court went wrong in entertaining ..... resignation offered by the workmen does not amount to retrenchment, invocation of the provision contained under section 2(a)(2) of the industrial disputes act would not arise and hence the labour court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the industrial dispute raised by the workman on his own. ..... this right is specifically conferred by clause 21 of the standing orders certified under section 5 of the industrial, employment (standing orders) act, 1946; this clause reads as under: any permanent clerk desirous of leaving the company's service shall give one month's notice in writing to the manager unless he has a specific agreement providing for a ..... anil and ors2, in support of his plea that section 2-a of the industrial disputes act does not cover every type of dispute between an individual workman and his employer, and it cannot cover any other dispute which does not relate to discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of service ..... is an officer of the petitioner company wielding considerable amounts of authority and influence, his acts cannot become acts of default on the part of the two workmen. ..... into service the judgment rendered by the supreme court in north zone cultural centre and another v. ..... 1981 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //