Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-08-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.46164617 OF2018MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC THRU THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MS. NATALIA VORUZ & OTHERS ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. THRU THE DIRECTOR & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) with CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 188 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.19411 of 2018 .APPELLANT(S) FEDERATION OF SEED INDUSTRY OF INDIA (FSII) VERSUS NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. AND OTHERS.RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 189190 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) Nos.1647916480 of 2018 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. AND ORS. ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 191192 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) Nos.1940919410 of 2018 ALL INDIA KISAN SABHA ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) 1 JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellants/plaintiffs in Civil Appeal Nos.46164617 of 2018 instituted Civil Suit (Comm) No.132 of 2016 seeking permanent injunction ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-07-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2530 OF2012Birla Institute of Technology .Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 02.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in LPA No.53 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the LPA filed by the appellant herein and confirmed the order dated 12.01.2007 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. No.2572 of 2005. 1 2. The controversy involved in this appeal is a short one as would be clear from the facts stated infra.3. The appellant is a premier technical educational institute of repute in the country. It is known as Birla Institute of Technology (BIT).4. Respondent No.4 joined the appellantInstitute as Assistant Professor on 16.09.1971 and superannuated on 30.11.2001 after attaining the age of superannuation.5. Respondent No....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-04-2019
1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1931 OF2009Champa Lal Dhakar .. Appellant Versus Naval Singh Rajput & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated 1.2.2008 in Criminal Revision No.830 of 2007, by which the High Court has partly allowed the said Revision Application preferred by the respondents herein original Accused and has set aside the order passed by the learned trial Court framing the charge under Section 307 of the IPC, the original Complainant has preferred the present appeal. 2 2. That the Appellant herein original Complainant lodged a FIR against the original Accused for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 451, 325/149, 307/149, 294/149 and 506/149 of the IPC. That the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sironj, District Vidisha in S.T. No.197 of 2005 framed the charge against the original ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-25-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.99 OF2018Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners Union of India & Ors. VERSUS WITH ..Respondents WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.100 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.115 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.459 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.598 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.775 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.822 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.849 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1221 OF2018SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28623 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF20191 JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. The present petitions assail the constitutional validity of various provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [Insolvency Code or Code].. Since we are deciding only questions relating to the constitutional validity of the Code, we are not going into the individual facts of any case.2. Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Advocate, appearing in Writ Petition (Civil) No.99 of 2018, has first...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-17-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.576 OF2016INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION (AHAR) & ANR. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.24 OF2017A N D WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.119 OF2017JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.This batch of three Writ Petitions was heard together and is being disposed of by this Common Judgment as similar issues and prayers are raised in all these petitions.2) The instant writ petitions have been preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging certain provisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein) Act, 2016 (hereinafter 2 referred to as the Act) and also the Rules framed there under being the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurant and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women (Working therein)...
Tag this Judgment!