Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.185/2001 Tara & ors. V/s State of Rajasthan & anr.2. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.266/1996 Mahant Damodar Dass & ors.V/s State of Rajasthan 3. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2309/1996 Samela & ors. V/s State of Rajasthan & ors.4. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.444/2004 State of Rajasthan & anr. V/s Board of Revenue & ors.5. D.B.Civil Writ Contempt Petition No.323/2007 Mahant Damodar Dass Chaila V/s Jagdish Prasad Garg, RTS Prabhudas & anr.6. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.1048/2007 Shri Shanti Nath Ji Sthan Deh V/s The State of Raj. & ors.7. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.947/2012 Ram Karan & ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.8. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.948/2012 Kishan Lal & Ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.9. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.949/2012 Ram Narain & Ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.10. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.950/2012 Thandi & Anr. V/s Board of Revenue, Ajmer & ors.11. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.951/2012 Ladu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.185/2001 Tara & ors. V/s State of Rajasthan & anr.2. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.266/1996 Mahant Damodar Dass & ors.V/s State of Rajasthan 3. D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2309/1996 Samela & ors. V/s State of Rajasthan & ors.4. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.444/2004 State of Rajasthan & anr. V/s Board of Revenue & ors.5. D.B.Civil Writ Contempt Petition No.323/2007 Mahant Damodar Dass Chaila V/s Jagdish Prasad Garg, RTS Prabhudas & anr.6. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.1048/2007 Shri Shanti Nath Ji Sthan Deh V/s The State of Raj. & ors.7. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.947/2012 Ram Karan & ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.8. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.948/2012 Kishan Lal & Ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.9. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.949/2012 Ram Narain & Ors. V/s State of Raj. & ors.10. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.950/2012 Thandi & Anr. V/s Board of Revenue, Ajmer & ors.11. D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.951/2012 Ladu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
By the Court: This criminal misc. petition under section 482 CrPC has been filed on behalf of the petitioners with a prayer for quashing the FIR No.123/2011 dated 12.11.2011 of Women Police Station, Udaipur. The FIR has been registered at the instance of respondent No.2, who happened to be daughter-in-law of the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and sister-in-law of petitioner No.4. The petitioner No.3 is the husband of petitioner No.4. In the FIR, the respondent No.2 has stated that her marriage was solemnized with Sunil Kumar (hereinafter referred to as 'accused No.1') son of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 on 07.05.2004 in Udaipur. It is further stated in the FIR that at the time of marriage of the respondent No.2 with accused No.1, other accused-persons had informed that he is a Mechanical Engineer working in Delhi and earning a very handsome salary and on believing that statement of the accused-persons, the father of respondent No.2 gifted gold ornaments weighing 30 tolas worth Rs.8,00,000/- and oth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER:1. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.9730/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4 D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.3185/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3 D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.3054/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5 D.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.551/2012 Mahavir Jain Vs. G.S.SANDHU & ORS. DATE OF ORDER :::20. h January 2015 HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.SUNIL AMBWANI HONBLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR REPORTABLE Mr.S.P.Sharma for the petitioner Mr.Sandeep Shah ) Mr.S.S.Ladrecha,AAG ) Mr.Ravindra Singh ) Mr.Kuldeep Mathur ) Ms.Kausar Parveen ) for the respondents BY THE COURT: (Per Hon Mr.Sunil Ambwani, Actg.CJ.) 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.2. This Writ Petition No.9730/2011 is filed in public interest with the following prayers:- It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed by the petitioner before your Lordship that; this writ petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER:1. D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.9730/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4 D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.3185/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3 D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.3054/2011 Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5 D.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.551/2012 Mahavir Jain Vs. G.S.SANDHU & ORS. DATE OF ORDER :::20. h January 2015 HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.SUNIL AMBWANI HONBLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR REPORTABLE Mr.S.P.Sharma for the petitioner Mr.Sandeep Shah ) Mr.S.S.Ladrecha,AAG ) Mr.Ravindra Singh ) Mr.Kuldeep Mathur ) Ms.Kausar Parveen ) for the respondents BY THE COURT: (Per Hon Mr.Sunil Ambwani, Actg.CJ.) 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.2. This Writ Petition No.9730/2011 is filed in public interest with the following prayers:- It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed by the petitioner before your Lordship that; this writ petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2005 Natwar Lal & Ors. Vs. Shri Prahlad Singh & Ors. Date of Order ::18. 11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner/s. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the petitioners filed a suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction against Prahlad Singh and Dalpat Singh regarding property known as 'Shahji Ka Bagicha' situated at Ward No.8, Kuchaman City. It was inter-alia claimed that the Western portion of the property was on rent with Nobal Senior Secondary School, about 1/2 Eastern portion is on rent with Commercial Taxes Department and Sheep & Wool Department and 1/2 Southern po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2005 Natwar Lal & Ors. Vs. Shri Prahlad Singh & Ors. Date of Order ::18. 11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner/s. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the petitioners filed a suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction against Prahlad Singh and Dalpat Singh regarding property known as 'Shahji Ka Bagicha' situated at Ward No.8, Kuchaman City. It was inter-alia claimed that the Western portion of the property was on rent with Nobal Senior Secondary School, about 1/2 Eastern portion is on rent with Commercial Taxes Department and Sheep & Wool Department and 1/2 Southern po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLN. NO.85/2013 M/S.Lakhlan & Qureshi Construction Co.versus The Resident Engineer, RHB, Division Pali-Marwar DATE OF ORDER : 19.8.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Shri Surajbhan Lakhlan, Partner of applicant firm Shri H.R.Naval, Resident Engineer & OIC, RHB, Division Pali ..BY THE COURT : By order dated 23.12.2009 the Resident Engineer, Rajasthan Housing Board, Division Pali Marwar awarded a work relating to construction of MIG (B)-30 nos Houses, Pindwara. to the applicant firm. As per the applicant, the entire work was completed, though, a delay of few days occurred but that was attributable to the respondents. A bill then was submitted for the escalated amount but of no consequence. Looking to all the circumstances, a request was made by the applicant on 30.9.2013 to refer the dispute to the Standing Committee for its resolution. No action thereupon was taken, hence this app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Narayan Singh versus State of Rajasthan D.B.Criminal Jail Appeal No.1105/2004 against the judgment dated 26.10.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Jalore, in Sessions Case No.[33/2004].68/2004. Date of Judgment :: 24th April, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr.M.K.Garg, for the appellant. Mr.Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor, for the State...BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.) This appeal is directed to challenge the judgment dated 26.10.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Jalore recording conviction of accused Narayan Singh for the offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and awarding sentence to undergo life term imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000/- with default stipulation. The factual matrix necessary to be noticed is that Shri Kapuraram, real brother of accused Narayan Singh, submitted a writt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:03. 02/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::03. d February 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Pritam Solanki, for the petitioner. -- BY THE COURT:1. The petitioner in the present writ petition has called in question the impugned transfer order dated 12.02.2013 (Annex.4), whereby the petitioner who was working as 'Prabodhak' (Teacher) at Government Secondary School, Chimana to a school (Govt. Primary School, Arnadiya), which was not in existence as on the date of such transfer as one Sh. Navla Ram, donated land measuring 3 Bigha of Khasra No.56/3 for setting up of the school.2. The ground of attack on the said transfer order is that the petitioner has been transferred at a place where actually the school was not even establis...
Tag this Judgment!