Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: recent Court: national consumer disputes redressal commission ncdrc Page 2 of about 12 results (0.074 seconds)

Mar 14 2012 (TRI)

Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Kikar Singh

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

VINEETA RAI, MEMBER 1. This revision petition has been filed by Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) being aggrieved by the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh in R.B.T.No.248/2007 in Appeal No.560/2001 decided in favour of Kikar Singh, Respondent herein, who was the original complainant before the District Forum. 2. In his complaint before the District Forum, Respondent/Complainant had contended that he had taken an electricity connection from Petitioner/Nigam to run his Atta Chakki business in Villa Navli and has been paying his bills regularly as per the actual consumption shown in the meter which was working properly. On 02.08.1998, a Vigilance Sub Inspector of the Petitioner/Nigam inspected the meter of the Respondent and alleged that the seals of the meter appears to have been tampered with and were not genuine, and accusing the Respondent of theft of energy, a penalty of Rs.95,921/- was imposed on hi...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2012 (TRI)

Narayana Iit Academy Vs. Atishya JaIn and Another

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Present revision petition has been filed by petitioner challenging order dated 23.7.2010, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (for short as State Commission). 2. Vide impugned order, appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, being barred by limitation. 3. Brief facts are that respondents (complainants in the District Forum) filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) against petitioner(opposite party in the District Forum) on the ground that respondent no.1 has suffered shock, trauma and mental agony due to the poor educational facilities being provided by the petitioner and as such he could not concentrate on his studies. Accordingly, respondents sought the following reliefs before the District Forum; i) To direct the opposite party to refund back Rs.65,730/- with interest, @ 18% per annum from the date of its receiving to the date of its realization. ii) To pay a sum of...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //