Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, against the judgment and decree dt.30.10.2014 passed in Matrimonial Case No.221/2013 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, at Bellary, allowing the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.) 1. The appellant/wife is aggrieved by the decree of divorce granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bellary (for short 'the Family Court') on his file in Matrimonial Case No.221/2013 dated 30.10.2014 thereby dissolving her marriage with the respondent/husband. 2. Succinctly stated, the husband filed a petition for divorce before the Family Court under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), alleging that the parties were married as per their customs on 1.12.2011 at Bellary. At the relevant point of time, he was working as Software Engineer at Bangalore and wife had M.C.A. graduation. Marriage was consummated and wife joined him at his parents' house at Bella...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: The Probate C Ps are filed under S.228, Part IX of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 praying to grant Letters of Administration to the Property and credits of the said deceased Dorothy Mavis Shedden to the petitioner to have effect throughout India, etc.; grant Letters of Administration to the property and credits of the said deceased George Reginald Upshon to the petitioner to have effect throughout India, etc.) 1. These petitions under S.228 Part IX of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been filed by one Mr. Parameshwaran Subramani seeking an ancillary Letter of Administration under the provisions of S.228 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ( Act for short) in the absence of the Executor Mr. Adrian Maxwell Kenneth Shedden (Jr) of Unit 3/72, Patrick Street, Clayton North and presently at No. 6, Anne Court, Cranbourne, Victoria 3977, Australia, in respect of the Will executed by one Mrs. Dorothy Mavis Shedden, his grand mother and the deceased who died in Clayton, Australia on...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the endorsement dated 09.07.2012 at Annex-N, issued by the R-2 and direct the respondents to reconsider the representation at Annex-L, given by the petitioners in the light of the final report of investigation submitted by the CID at Annex-J, vide covering letter dated 09.04.2012 at Annex-K and direct the respondents to take appropriate steps/actions with regard to the vitiated selection process of 1998, 1999 and 2004, Gazetted Group A and B Posts. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus take corrective action of the recruitments and appointments on the basis of the CID report pertaining to the selection for KAS [Probationers] for the year 1998, 1999 and 2004 as per earlier the recommendations of the K.K.Mishra Committee Report and the final report was submitted on 09.04.2012, vide ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF MAY, 2016 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.483/2016 C/W RFA NOS.458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 539, 552, 578 & 579 OF2016BETWEEN: KARNATAKA FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR V.K. SHETTY, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, SHOP PREMISES NO.34 & 35, BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.483/2016) B.R. HARISH AGED ABOUT60YEARS, S/O. B.A. RAMAPPA GOWDA, M/s. SPECTRA FOODS SHOP NO.27 & 28, BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.458/2016) PUSHPA RAI AGED ABOUT52YEARS W/O. RAMESH RAI SHOP PREMISES NO.37 BDA INDIRANAGAR SHOPPING COMPLEX, 2 BANGALORE 560 038. APPELLANT (IN RFA NO.459/2016) SRI LI CHING LIN AGED ABOUT60YEARS S/O. LATE LI YUNG CHUNG SHOP PREMISES NO.07 AUSTIN TOWN ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for records and to set aside the impugned order dated 12.5.2011 passed by the first respondent and produced hereto as Annexure-A.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The brief facts as stated are, that Shri Durga Parameshwari Temple, Kateel, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District is an ancient temple. It is a temple notified as a religious endowment under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1997 Act' for brevity). It is stated that the temple has been managed and administered by an ancient noble family, Devashya. It is stated that the said Devashya family owned large tracts of land, comprised in four villages, including that of Kondemoola. It is said that the family also owned large Guthu houses, of which Kodethur Guthu was one, situated at Mennabettu village. It is claimed that with t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. Heard the learned Senior Advocate Shri Udaya Holla appearing for the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate. 2. The petitioner is said to be a member of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), which has been carrying on agricultural operations on agricultural lands in Koteswara village, Kundapur Taluk. The petitioner s family is said to have purchased agricultural lands bearing Sy.Nos.13, 13/1, 14 and 15/2 of Byalalu village, Tavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk totally measuring about 17 acres 10 guntas under a registered sale deed dated 18.3.2005 in the name of the petitioner. Subsequent to the purchase, the khata of the property is said to have been transferred in the name of the petitioner. The record of rights pertaining to the property also reflected the petitioner as the owner and cultivator of the land in question. Copies of those records were annexed to the petitions. Subsequent to the purchase, the purchaser had approached M/s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF MARCH, 2016 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.37347-37349 OF2009(LR-RES) BETWEEN: Shri Udaya Holla, Senior Advocate for Shri S. PETITIONER Sri. B.M.Upendra Kumar, Son of Sri. B.N.Manjunatha Rao, Aged about 40 years, Agriculturist cum Cine Artist, No.7, 1st Cross VI Block, III Stage, Banashankari, Bangalore 560 085. (By Chandrashekar, Advocate for M/s. Holla and Holla) AND:1. 2. (By Smt. B.P.Radha, Government Pleader) State of Karnataka, Represented by its Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore. The Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore South Sub Division, Bangalore. RESPONDENTS. 2 These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 26th June 2009 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore South Sub Division, Bangalore Respondent no.2 vide Annexure-J and the judgment/order dated 3.11.2009 passed in Appeal No.640...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY2016BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA Crl.P. No.7904/2015 BETWEEN: CHRISTIAN CHIDIEERE CHUKWU S/O SILVERNUS, AGED28YEARS C/O MOHAMAD YAKUB, 3RD CROSS ASHIRVAD LAYOUT, MARAGONDANA HALLI MAIN ROAD, T.C.PALYA K.R.PURA, BANGALORE-560 036. NATIVE OF: PLOT NO.913, 6TH AVENUE FESTACT WOWN, LOGOS STATE NIGERIA. PETITIONER ( BY SRI G.NAGARAJA GOWDA, ADV.) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.R.PURAM POLICE STATION BANGALORE. REP BY SPP HIGH COURT COMPLEX BANGALORE-560001.2) UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI A.S.PONNANNA, ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI KRISHNA S.DIXIT, ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) 2 CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.602/15OF K.R.PURAM POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECs.376, 5...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: Crl.P. filed U/S. 439 Cr.P.C praying that this Hon ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 602/15 of K.R.Puram Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Secs. 376, 506, I.P.C. and Section 14, Foreigners Act.) 1. The present bail application is filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C. by the sole accused of a criminal case in Crime No. 602/15 registered by K.R. Puram police station, Bengaluru, on 1.10.2015. 2. Initially the case was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, I.P.C. After concluding investigation, charge sheet is filed for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506, I.P.C. and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. 3. Learned SPP representing the State has vehemently opposed bail on the ground that prima facie case is forthcoming in regard to the criminal intimidation of the first informant, a lady by name Ms. Sai kumara by this petitioner and committing rape on her. It is argued th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the notification dt.30.6.14 Vide No.RPS 58/2008, and the notification dt.14.7.14, Vide No.RPS 58/2008 issued by the R3 as per Ann-A and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare that the notification dated 30.6.2014 passed by the R-1 Vide Ann-A is illegal and quash the same and etc.,) 1. "The profession of law, said Justice McCardie, has two aspects. It may be regarded as a pursuit which yields, if success be gained, a reward of fees and emoluments. But it may also be looked upon as a vocation which offers the joy of intellectual achievement, which claims the allegiance of unswerving honour, which asks for the guardianship of high tradition, and which affords a wide field for loyal and generous ser...
Tag this Judgment!