Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-18-2016
IA 2920/2016 1. By this order, I shall decide IA 2920/2016, which is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, 1908 wherein the plaintiff has sought the following reliefs: a) pass an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants, their life trustees, term trustees, advisories, members, franchisees, officers, employees, servants, agents, delegates, representatives, assignees, associates and all others acting for and on their behalf from offering their services, advertising, offering franchisees, selling goods and stationary, adopting, using and / or dealing in any manner with the registered trade mark / name 'DPS' and logo IMAGE (Plaintiff s registered mark) of the plaintiff or any other trade mark identical or deceptively similar to the registered trade marks of the plaintiff amounting to infringement and passing off the plaintiffs registered trade marks; b) pass an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against defend...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-07-2016
Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. Rohit Singh is a software developer and works as a consultant with Vyooh Low Level Computing LLP. The two joined in an action, as plaintiffs, claiming relief of damages as also an injunction against Apple Inc from using the mark SplitView or a deceptively similar variant whereof in relation to its software products. 2. The action is one of passing of. 3. As per Rohit Singh, he developed three proprietary software products targeted at the end consumers which he named SplitView, Disk View and ViewScribe respectively. As per him, the trademark in issue in the suit i.e. SplitView was the most commercial successful product. It permitted the user to simultaneously work on multiple windows on the users computer screen. He initially sold his software products through a sole proprietary concern named Vyooh and later on formed a single member limited liability company called Yyooh LCC, through which he sold his software products and in the year 2010 he gave an exclusive ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2016
Mukta Gupta, J. 1. Pawan @ Ram Sala @ Chanda has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC for murdering Govind Sarin @ Shanky vide impugned judgment dated November 24, 2015 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life vide order on sentence dated November 30, 2015 on the strength of the testimony of the two eye witnesses Tarun Arya @ Ginni, PW-1 and Sumit, PW-2. 2. Police machinery was set into motion on receipt of DD No.38A at Police Station Subzi Mandi on November 03, 2013 at 11.15 PM informing that a quarrel had taken place in Gali Mitra Wali, Roshanara Road, House No.4780, near Mata ka Mandir. DD No.38A was sent to SI Manish Kumar, PW-7 who was already in the area through Constable Rakesh PW-15 who reached the spot and found blood in front of House No.4783, Gali Mitranwali, Roshanara Road. The injured had been removed to Hindu Rao Hospital. So SI Mukesh Kumar reached Hindu Rao Hospital and collected MLC No.8626 on which the doctor endorsed brought dead . The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-21-2016
..... order till completion of pleadings by the parties. 10. the learned single judge has come to a prima-facie conclusion that at this stage at least the play lists of nepali nasha and haroon ka nasha in the website of 8 tracks.com are existing since the years 2012 and 2013 and of nashamusic.com since 2006, which websites have existed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-29-2016
I.S. Mehta, J. 1. The present petitioners, i.e., Workmen, DDA (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner-workmen ) have preferred the present Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate Writ, order or direction to set aside the impugned Award dated 01.05.2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal No. III, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the learned Labour Court/Industrial Adjudicator ) in I.D. No. 20/1997. 2. The brief facts stated are that the petitioner-workmen, i.e., Shri Ramgopal Singh, Shri Adil Singh, Shri Rajinder Prasad, Shri Kartar Singh, Shri Kamal Kishore, Shri Hoshiar Singh, Shri Nepal Singh, Shri Virender Singh, Shri Anil Kumar, Shri Prem Chand, Shri Amrinder Kumar Singh, Shri Bhim Singh, Shri Yogender Kumar, Shri Ashok Kumar, Shri Rakesh Kushwaha, Shri Babu Ram, Mohd. Sarfarajuddin and Shri Ashok Kumar, whose cause of action has been exposed through the D.D.A Mazdoor Union wherein the petitioner-workme...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-25-2016
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking quashing of the provisional attachment order dated 24.01.2014 (hereafter impugned order') passed by the Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement under section 5 (1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereafter the Act') whereby the entire basement and ground floor of the property situated at E-14/3, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi belonging to Smt. Alka Rajvansh has been attached considering it as proceeds of crime. 2. The brief facts that are relevant for examining the controversy in the present petition are as under:- 2.1 On 08.05.2009, an FIR was lodged by the CBI on a written complaint made by Shri S.K. Maggu, Deputy Manager of National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (hereafter NAFED') wherein it was alleged that Mr Homi Rajvansh - the Additional Managing Director of NAFED, had hatched a conspiracy, in connivance with the directors of M/s M.K. Agri International Ltd. (hereafter MKAIL'), for m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-19-2016
1. By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( ˜Cr.P.C.'), petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing of FIR No.132/2015 registered at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi, for the offence punishable under Sections 406/409/420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( ˜IPC'). 2. The aforesaid case was registered against the petitioner on the complaint of respondent No.2, who stated therein that the petitioner is the founder member of Shiksha Vihar Co-operative Housing Society Limited (for short Society'), having registered office at 123-A, Aakanksha Apartment, Abhay Khand-III, Indrapuram, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. The said Society was registered in the year 1982. Since then, office of the Society had been located at R-61, Vikas Marg, Delhi, till the year 2000 and thereafter till 2005-2006 remained at Babarpur, Shahdra, Delhi. 3. It is alleged that the petitioner has misappropriated the funds of the Society to the tune of crores of r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-04-2016
1. By way of this order, I propose to decide two pending applications, one being I.A. No.22711/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff and another being I.A. No.26365/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC filed by the defendants for vacation of the interim order passed on 14th November, 2014. 2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profit, damages, etc. against the defendants. 3. Brief facts of the case as per the plaint are:- (i) The plaintiff Company was incorporated in the year 1981 and is engaged inter alia in the business of manufacturing, distributing and marketing of high quality pharmaceutical preparations. (ii) The plaintiff's key therapeutic segments include antiseptics, analgesics, gastroenterology, gynaecology, dermatology and neurocare and protein supplements. Some of the pharmaceutical preparations manufactured/marketed by the plaint...
Tag this Judgment!