Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-05-2020
..... no.6195, 6196 & 6199 but banshilal, pyarelal s/o late har lal, hitesh verma s/o sh. pyarelal, pawan verma s/o banshilal, uma verma w/o pyarelal and their nepali domestic help raju from past 6 months are not allowing the applicant to work on her fields. all the above persons used to abuse the applicant her husband and other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-06-2020
Civil Appeal No.5808 of 2017 SK. MD. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA1Reportable CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5808 OF2017Sk. Md. Rafique VERSUS Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others Appellant Respondents WITH C.A. No.6098/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.670/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.669/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.828/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 C.A. No.5809/2017 C.A. No.5826/2017 C.A. No.5817/2017 C.A. No.5814/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.583/2016 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 C.A. No.5829/2017 W.P.(C) No.723/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.846/2016 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 Civil Appeal No.5808 of 2017 SK. MD. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others 2 CONMT.PET.(C) No.1509/2017 in C.A. No.5808/2017 W.P.(C) No.629/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.1798/2017 in C.A. No.5808/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.937/2018 in C.A. No.5808/2017 CONMT.PET.(C)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-28-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.5440 OF2020[@ DIARY No.1476 OF2020 District Bar Association, Dehradun through its Secretary .. Petitioner Versus Ishwar Shandilya & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 25.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition (PIL) No.31 of 2016, the District Bar Association, Dehrarun, through its Secretary, has preferred the present SLP. That by the impugned judgment and order, the High Court in the writ petition (PIL) filed by the private respondent herein has issued the following directions: The District Bar Associations of Dehradun, Haridwar and Udham Singh Nagar shall, forthwith, withdraw their call for a strike, and start attending Courts on all working Saturdays. All the District 2 Bar Associations in the State shall forthwith refrain from abstaining from Courts beca...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-06-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P. (C) NOS.9036-9038 OF2016 INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS .PETITIONER MANOHARLAL & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH S.L.P.(C) NOS. 9798-9799 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) NOS. 17088-17089 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.37375 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.37372 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) NOS. 16573-16605 OF2016 S.L.P. (C) CC No.15967 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.19356 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19362 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19361 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19358 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19357 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19360 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19359 OF2017S.L.P.(C) NOS. 34752-34753 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.15890 OF2017 2 CIVIL APPEAL No.19363 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19364 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19412 OF2017MA1423OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.12247 OF2016S.L.P.(C) No.33022 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.33127 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.33114 OF2017MA1787OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.10210 OF2016MA1786OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.10207 OF2016MA45OF2018IN CIVIL APPEAL No.6239 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.16051 OF2019DIARY No.2384...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-19-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.452 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.2433/2020) S.KASI ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BHUSHAN,J.ASHOK This appeal has been filed questioning the judgment of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 11.05.2020 in Crl.OP(MD) No.5296 of 2020 by which judgment the bail application of the appellant has been dismissed.2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are: - 2.1. The appellant is an accused in Crime No.495 of 2015 under Sections 457, 380, 457(2), 380(2), 411(2) and 414(2) of Indian Penal Code. The appellant was arrested on 21.02.2020 in the above case 2 and lodged in Central Prison, Trichy. The bail application of the appellant under Section 439 was rejected by the trial court on 30.04.2020. After being in judicial custody for more than 73 days, the appellant filed an application Crl.OP(MD)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-06-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.541 OF2020REEPAK KANSAL ..PETITIONER VERSUS SECRETARYGENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ORS. ..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The petitioner, who is an Advocate practicing in this Court, has filed the writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India against various officers of the Registry of this Court and the Union of India. Prayer has been made to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to give preference to the cases filed by influential lawyers/ petitioners, law firms, etc. Prayer has been made to direct the respondents to give equal treatment to the cases filed by ordinary lawyers/ petitioners and not to point out unnecessary defects, refund the excess court fee and other charges, and not to tag the cases without order or direction of the Court with other cases. A prayer has also been made to direct the S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-19-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.72407248 OF2009THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT Appellant Versus M/S. CERA BOARDS AND DOORS, KANNUR KERALA ETC. ETC. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.86158620 OF2009CIVIL APPEAL Nos.22362253 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.32273230 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.32313233 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.65646567 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.99889991 OF20112 JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian,J.Introduction 1. All the appeals on hand are by the Commissioners of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax of different Commissionerates, filed under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), questioning the correctness of the orders passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Bangalore (CESTAT) in seven different batches of cases, but arising out of similar facts and raising identical questions.2. For the purpose of convenience,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-31-2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REPORTABLE SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.1 OF2020IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR. JUDGMENT1 Heard Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India, Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Shri Dushyant Dave, Shri C.U. Singh, learned senior counsel, and the contemnorShri Prashant Bhushan.2. After having adjudged Shri Prashant Bhushan, Advocate, guilty of contempt vide judgment dated 14.08.2020, Dr. Rajeev Dhavan and Shri Dushyant Dave, learned senior counsel appearing for the contemnorShri Prashant Bhushan raised the following arguments: (i) That the copy of the petition on the basis of which the suo motu cognizance was taken by this Court with respect to first tweet, filed by Shri Mahek Maheshwari, was not furnished, in spite of the application having been filed by the contemnor. Thus, it could not be ascertained whether the complaint was mala fide or even personally or politically motivated. 1 (ii) The factors relevant for sentencing are t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-30-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.7369 of 2019 Satish @ Sabbe ..... Petitioner(s) VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh .....Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.8326 of 2019 Surya Kant, J: JUDGMENT1 These petitions, which were heard through video conferencing, have been filed by Satish and Vikky @ Vikendra alias Virendra, seeking special leave to appeal against a common order dated 28.04.2017 of the Allahabad High Court through which their appeal against conviction under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, IPC) and consequential sentence of life imprisonment, was turned down. Page | 1 FACTS2 The undisputable facts of the case are that on the evening of 12.06.2002, when one Vishal Sarawat (the victim) was on his way to meet a friend, he was stopped by an acquaintance Ramvir Rana who asked him for a lift to his house. The unsuspecting victim walked into Ramvirs house where he was th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-07-2020
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3334 of 2020 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3335 of 2019) Commissioner of Police and Anr Appellants Vs. Umesh Kumar Respondent And With Civil Appeal No.3335 of 2020 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.5545 of 2019) 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1On 27 January 2013, a notice was published in the newspapers for filling up 523 vacancies for the post of Constable (Executive) Male in the Delhi Police. The break-up of vacancies indicated 262 to be unreserved, 142 for OBC candidates, 79 for Scheduled Caste candidates and 40 for those belonging to the Scheduled Tribes. The candidates appeared for a physical endurance and measurement test on 4 October 2013. Upon qualifying at the test, the candidates were allotted roll numbers for appearing in the written examination. Of a total of 50,422 candidates, 39,597 appeared in the written examination which was held on 8 March 2014....
Tag this Judgment!