Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: old Court: himachal pradesh Page 3 of about 85 results (0.010 seconds)

Satish Kumar Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2244

Surjit Singh, J.1. Through this common judgment, two appeals one filed by Satish Kumar, who has been convicted of offence, under Section 302, I.P.C. and another by Anil alias Neelu, who has been convicted of offence under Section 307, I.P.C. are being disposed of, because the appellants, in both the appeals, have been convicted and sentenced for the aforesaid offences at one trial by the same judgment.2. Facts relevant for the disposal of the appeals may be noticed. The two appellants along with one Ashwani, were sent up for trial for offences, punishable under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34, I.P.C. for allegedly committing the murder of one Gunny Mohammad and making murderous assault on one Rashid Mohammad. Prosecution version was as follows. P.W. 1 Suresh Kumar was employed as driver with M/s. Jagan Nath and Sons of Ghumarwin.On 21-10-2001, around 8 p.m. when he was returning to his house in village Takehra, after finishing his job for the day, Ashwani Kumar accused (who h...

Chank Bahadur Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4454,2007(2)ShimLC324

..... charas until and unless they have any reasons to falsely implicate the accused for which there were no suggestions made to any of the witnesses. the accused admittedly was a nepali and currency notes of nepal were also recovered from the bag and the police officials had no reason to falsely implicate the accused who was a ..... nepali and they had no animus 'against him to falsely implicate him. it has been held by the hon'ble apex court also that until and unless there are some allegations .....

Rattan Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC289

Deepak Gupta, J.1. The Excise and Taxation Department issued an Excise Policy and arrangements for the year 2007-2008. Under this Policy individual applications were invited for allotment of retail vends. The respondent No. 2 issued public notice in terms of the Excise Policy on 22.2.2007 inviting applications for allotment of retail sale license of country liquor and Indian made foreign liquor. As per this scheme and the notice of allotment, the allotment was to be made by draw of lots in case there were more than one application for a particular vend/unit. The draw of lot was to be conducted by a Committee consisting of the Deputy Commissioner of the District, representative of the Excise and Taxation Department Himachal Pradesh, the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner of the respective Zone and the Assistant Excise and Taxation Commissioner/Excise and Taxation Officer Incharge of the Districts. As per the notice and the terms and conditions it was not necessary for the applicant...

Prakash Chand Vs. P.S.E.B. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC381

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. The brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner raised a dispute relating to his retrenchment which was ultimately referred by the State Government to the Labour Court to determine as to 'whether the termination of Shri Parkash Chand by the Resident Engineer, Punjab State Electricity Board, Shanan Power House, Jogindernagar, District Mandi (H.P.) with effect from 22.9.1978 without any notice or compliance of Section 25(F) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and without enquiry is legal and justified, if not, to what relief and service benefits Shri Parkash Chand is entitled to?'2. The case set up by the petitioner before the Labour Court was that he was engaged on March, 1973 as T-Mate and thereafter he discharged the duty of carpenter with effect from 1.10.1977 to 22.9.1978. He had further averred that since he had completed 240 days preceding his retrenchment from 23.9.1978. He was entitled to protection under Section 25-F o...

Ramesh Lal and Vinod Bhandari Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC34

..... very early hours of the morning when it was dark the police spotted the appellants coming together on the highway at a lonely place and vinod bhandari appellant, who is nepali was carrying a bag, which raised the suspicion to the police. the bag ext. p-4 contained the charas as discovered on search along with the clothes of the appellant ..... argument is also rejected.17. lastly sh. rakesh jaswal counsel for appellant ramesh lal has argued that said ramesh lal had no acquaintance with appellant vinod bhandari who is a nepali and there was no reason to put his clothes in the bag (ex.p-4) of vinod bhandari and further no case of abetment or conspiracy is made out to .....

Kaushalya Devi and anr. Vs. Bhag Chand

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(I)ShimLC9

..... place in the year 1994 for 2-2 1/2 years the relations between the parties remained cordial. thereafter the husband is alleged to have developed illicit relations with one nepali girl and started neglecting the wife and, therefore, maintenance was claimed for each of the petitioners at the rate of rs. 500/- per month. it would be pertinent to mention .....

Mohan MeakIn Breweries Ltd. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC505

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. A challenge has been laid to the orders passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue) in case No. 122/82. 123/82 (Revision) dated 15.10.1998. The brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner-company is incorporated under the Companies Act. It is carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of Indian made foreign liquor, beer, break-fast food and food products etc. The assessing authority had passed the assessment order for the assessment year 1968-69. The assessing authority had allowed exemption under Section 41(A)(ii) of the H.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1968 for the sales of goods made in the course of export out of the territory of India. The assessing authority passed an order for the assessment year 1969-70 (Remand case) on 19.1.1976. The company preferred an appeal before the appellate authority. The appellate authority passed the order on 22.4.1977.2. Thereafter on remand, fresh order was passed by the assessing autho...

State of H.P. Vs. Balvinder Kaur and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ShimLC435

Surjit Singh, J.1. State is aggrieved by the judgment of the Sessions Court whereby respondents Balvinder Kaur and Saravjit Singh and another person named Ravinder Singh, since deceased, have been acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to murder, murder and destruction of evidence of murder with a view to screening the offenders. So it has filed the present appeal.2. Facts, as they emerge from the prosecution evidence may be stated thus: Deceased Surjit Singh was employed as a Constable with Punjab Police. In the year 1987, his wife died. He was thereafter transferred to Mohali. He started living in the neighborhood of respondent Balvinder Kaur. Deceased and respondent Balvinder Kaur developed illicit relations. Deceased rented some accommodation at Dharampur in the building of Raj Kumar (PW 3) in July, 1990 and occupied the same on 5-9-1990. Respondent Balvinder Kaur accompanied him. A son of the deceased aged about, eight years, named Chhapinder Singh alias Soni (PW 14) was also with ...

Shyam Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ShimLC370

..... , shops or persons available near the place of recovery. he denied his knowledge in case there is small house above the place where the accused was arrested or 3-4 nepalis reside near the residence of the accused. pw-1 hhc hem raj has clearly stated that he was sent in search of local and independent witnesses, but he could not .....

Mr. Dawa Gyaltsen Vs. Mr. Sonam Sangbo Jadur and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Dev Darshan Sud, J.1. The plaintiff and defendant No. 1 are Tibetans who are residing at Dharamsala. The plaintiff has filed this suit on the allegations that defendant No. 1 who was a Member of the Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission deliberately and with malicious intent undertook a course of conduct to malign the reputation of the plaintiff. According to the pleadings, the plaintiff pleads2. Whether Reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes. that the acts constituting defamation attributable to defendant No. 1 are that he was proclaiming:(i) The plaintiff is not a loyal and a conscientious Tibetan citizen;(ii) The plaintiff stands ostracized from the Tibetan society as he no longer can vote or hold any elected office in the Tibetan society;(iii) The plaintiff is a convict and has been convicted by the Justice Commission whereas this is not the case and(iv) The plaintiff has been misdirecting and also willfully flouting the Rules under which a scholarship was awar...