Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-02-2008
Jasti Chelameswar, C.J.1. Heard Ms. M Deb, learned Counsel appearing for he petitioner. Also heard Ms. B Goyal, learned Govt. Advocate who represents the State respondents.2. The present petition has been filed seeking direction of the Court for conducting an enquiry into the killing of the petitioner's son Prakash Deka @ Mridul who was killed in police firing on 8-8-2007 and also for directions for paying compensation to the petitioner and for taking appropriate actions against the guilty police officers.3. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, counter affidavit on behalf of the Deputy Commissioner, Darrang, Mangaldoi of Darrang District is filed.4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner's son died on account of police firing, while he was driving accompanied by six others and proceeding in a Maruti Van. It is not in the dispute that in the process one of the other passengers Smti Gita Kalita also sustained a bullet injury in her leg. It is also not in dispute that the vehic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jul-22-2008
T. Vaiphei, J.1. The constitutional validity of the provisions of Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council (Prevention of Defection) Act, 2003 ('the Act' for short) and the rules made thereunder, namely, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council (Prevention of Defection) Rules, 2005. ('the Rules') whereunder the writ petitioner has been disqualified as Member of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council ('the District Council' for short), is called into question in this writ petition.2. The material facts of the case are not in dispute. The petitioner was elected as Member of the District Council form No. 13, Laitkroh District Council Constituency in the election held in the year 2004 for a term of five years. After holding the office of the Executive Member, Law and Elaka Administration Department in the District Council for sometime, he was ultimately appointed as the Chief Executive Member till he was removed on 5.2.2008 by a No-Confidence Motion moved against him. After his removal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Sep-30-2008
A.K. Patnaik, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1961'). 2. The respondent herein carries on the business of a Hospital. For the assessment year 1994-95, the respondent claimed a deduction under Section 80-HH and Section 80-I of the Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 14,85,387. The Assessing Officer, namely, the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment), Special Range-I, Guwahati, in his assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act, 1961, dated 5.3.1997 held that since the assessee company was notan industrial undertaking, it was not eligible for deduction under Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Act, 1961. Against the said order of assessment, the respondent filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Guwahati. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the issue as to whether the respondent was entitled to deduction under Sections 80-HH and 80-I of the Act, 1961, had been decided ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Nov-27-2008
..... both gitarani and urmila since they refused to satisfy his sexual desire. he had further stated that accused mantaz ali caused death to them by cutting their necks by a 'nepali khukri' he was having with him. accused mantaz ali declined to confess before the court though he had admitted his involvement in the crime. since there was no eyewitness to .....
Tag this Judgment!