Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 238/2002 TAPAS Judgment delivered on: December 03, 2013 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sumit Verma, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order on sentence dated 22.08.2001 and 01.09.2001, respectively, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, has convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life together with imposition of fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant was directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two days.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 11, 2013 + CRL.A. 1079/2010 BEERU Through ..... Appellant Avi Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. One can visibly see the growth of the country in all spheres keeping a pace with the modernization, advancement, science and technology but unfortunately the only front which is on the decline is the moral values. In the recent past, the country has witnessed too many horrifying and heart rendering incidents of rapes and many of such cases were so brutal and barbaric, that they jolted the society to ponder whether such beastly acts can be committed by a human being on the other. Amongst such horrifying incidents, sexual assaults involving minor children are the worst and amongst the worst, the cases involving sexual ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.6150/2013 Reserved on:11. h December, 2013 Date of Decision:12. h December, 2013 % NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikas Srivastava, Mr. J.P. Singh, Mr. Parag Mohanty & Ms. Leenshwari Makhijani and Ms. Varsha Bhattacharya, Advocates. versus ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX & ANR. .. Respondents Through Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Solicitor General with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Nitin Gulati, Advocate, Mr.P. Roy Choudhary, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.CM No.15485/2013 (for modification of interim orders dt.26.9.13) This order disposes of the application filed by Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. (Nokia India, for short) seeking modification of interim order dated 26th September, 2013, passed in the aforementioned writ petition.2. The writ petition impugns and challenges order dated 25...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
..... record gave details of the various army personnel who were not granted extension and were retired on completion of their service. the details of the claimant are extracted hereunder:- 01 / nepali screened tulasa screened date of sos not 12 nationality 11 gurung feb nok for pension gtc (depot coy) 05 date of reporting in 14 date of pension docus 29 feb .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
..... record gave details of the various army personnel who were not granted extension and were retired on completion of their service. the details of the claimant are extracted hereunder:- 01 / nepali screened tulasa screened date of sos not 12 nationality 11 gurung feb nok for pension gtc (depot coy) 05 date of reporting in 14 date of pension docus 29 feb .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:17. h December, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8017/2012 NANAK CHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. with Ms. Seema Salwan, Adv. versus DDA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks allotment of a similar MIG Flat as Flat No.188, (FF), Pocket-B, Sector 13, Dwarka allotted to him was cancelled without any just and reasonable ground.2. At the time of hearing of the writ petition, Mr. R.K.Saini, learned counsel for the Petitioner conceded that if the Petitioner is found to be entitled to a similar flat now, he (the Petitioner) has no objection in accepting the allotment at current cost.3. The Petitioner got himself registered for allotment of an MIG flat under the Ambedkar Awas Yojna. He was allotted the Registration No.6362. At the time of registration, he gave his...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :03. d DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 597/2000 ANIL @ BITTOO Through : ....Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate with Mr.Ram Kumar, Advocate. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anil @ Bittoo (the appellant) questions the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 19.09.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.603/96 arising out of FIR No.441/93 PS Ashok Vihar whereby he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 307 IPC and by an order dated 23.09.2000 awarded RI for three and a half years with fine ` 1,500/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 20.12.1993 at about 08.50 P.M. in a gali outside House No.J-II/41, Wazirpur, JJ Colony, Delhi, he and his associates Rangila, Tika Ram and Pawan Kumar (since acquitted) inflicted injuries to Mane Ram and Raj Rani. First Information Report was lodged after...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:16. 12.2013 Date of Decision:20. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 5283/2013 YASH SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 5284/2013 ARYAN SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The only issue involved in these writ petitions is as to whether the respondents are entitled to determine the age of a person seek...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:16. 12.2013 Date of Decision:20. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 5283/2013 YASH SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 5284/2013 ARYAN SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The only issue involved in these writ petitions is as to whether the respondents are entitled to determine the age of a person seek...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :12.12.2013 Judgment delivered on:20.12.2013 CRL.A.344/1998 JAWAHAR BALWANI AND ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 On 19.10.1993 on the second floor of house No.F-1U173 Pitam Pura, Delhi, the dead body of Rita was discovered. This discovery had been made by her husband Madan Lal (PW-13) who on returning home at 08:15-08:30 pm from his shop at Sadar Bazar found the lights in the building off; on entering the room and switching on the light, he found articles scattered on the ground; in the drawing room, the dead body of his wife Rita was lying; the television was on at full volume; his son Bharat Parwani (PW-6) was lying in an injured condition and was groaning for water. He was not in a condition to speak. Brother of PW13 Raj Kumar (PW-9) living o...
Tag this Judgment!