Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-16-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.2998 of 2000 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA Petitioner : Smt. Vijaya Rajlaxmi W/o Col. P.R. Choudhry, resident of Chitranjan Para, New Delhi through Attorney Col. P.R. Choudhry. Versus Respondents :1. State of Madhya Pradesh, through Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (M.P.) 2. Commissioner, Revenue, Sagar Division, Sagar, (M.P.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by - Shri Ravish Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri K.S. Jha, Advocate. Respondent no.1/State- Shri S.M. Lal, Government Advocate Date of hearing 09/08/2012 Date of order - /08/2012 ORDER ( /08/2012) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking quashment of the impugned order dated 11.4.2000 (Annexure P/1) passed by the first respondent State of M.P. whereby the lease of the land i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-25-2012
1 AFR HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH Criminal Reference No.2/2011 IN REFEENCE Received from III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Narsinghpur, M.P.. Versus 1. Rahul Rajak, s/o Ashok Rajak, aged about 25 years, resident of Near Shyam Talkies, Narsinghpur (M.P.).2. Ashok Kumar, s/o Bhawani Prasad Vishwakarma, aged 37 years, resident of Ganesh Nagar, Bargi Colony, Narsinghpur, Police Station, Tehsil and District Narsinghpur (M.P.).3. Satish Parochi, s/o Imrat Lal Parochi, aged 28 years, resident of Housing Board Colony, Police Station, Narsinghpur (M.P.). ---------------------------------------------------------- For the State: Shri Umesh Pandey,Govt. Advocate. For the Complainant: Shri Surendra Singh,Sr. Advocate, with Shri Ashwani Kumar Dubey, advocate. For the Respondents/: Shri S.C. Datt, Sr. Advocate, Accused with Shri Siddharth Datt,Advocate, Shri R.S. Patel, Shri Alok Vagrecha, advocates. ------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-26-2012
1 AFR HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH Criminal Reference No.2/2011 IN REFEENCE Received from III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Narsinghpur, M.P.. Versus 1. Rahul Rajak, s/o Ashok Rajak, aged about 25 years, resident of Near Shyam Talkies, Narsinghpur (M.P.).2. Ashok Kumar, s/o Bhawani Prasad Vishwakarma, aged 37 years, resident of Ganesh Nagar, Bargi Colony, Narsinghpur, Police Station, Tehsil and District Narsinghpur (M.P.).3. Satish Parochi, s/o Imrat Lal Parochi, aged 28 years, resident of Housing Board Colony, Police Station, Narsinghpur (M.P.). ---------------------------------------------------------- For the State: Shri Umesh Pandey,Govt. Advocate. For the Complainant: Shri Surendra Singh,Sr. Advocate, with Shri Ashwani Kumar Dubey, advocate. For the Respondents/: Shri S.C. Datt, Sr. Advocate, Accused with Shri Siddharth Datt,Advocate, Shri R.S. Patel, Shri Alok Vagrecha, advocates. ------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-16-2012
Reported in : 2012CrLJ2046
M.A. SIDDIQUI, J. 1. Since both the appeals arise out of common judgment, hence they are being decided by this common judgment. 2. The State has filed Criminal Appeal No. 882/09 feeling aggrieved by the judgment delivered by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur in Sessions Trial No. 63/92 on 5th December, 1994 by which above accused, and accused Mexi @ Rajendra Kumar (since dead), have been acquitted of the charges under Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 of IPC, but all four appellants were convicted and sentenced under Section 304 IPC read with Section 34 of IPC to R.I. for 6 years each. Convicted accused persons have filed Criminal Appeal No.1509/94 assailing their conviction and sentence under Section 304 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. 3. The brief facts of the case before the trial Court were that accused formed unlawful assembly with deadly weapons, and in furtherance of their common object, committed murder of Nanhu @ Ramkumar at about 3 AM on 31.3.91. It is said ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-12-2012
WRIT PETITION No.14654/20112. 09.2012 Shri Umesh Shrivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Though the matter is listed for default, as has been pointed out by the office, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is a retired person and is claiming the parity with the decision already rendered in the similar circumstances by this Court, the default pointed out by the office is ignored. The petitioner who was employed in private school, which was taken over by the State Government, is claiming the benefit of grant of pension from the date, counting the period he has rendered service in the private school. This Court in various cases has considered these aspects and in W.P.No.10240/2008 (S) [Bhola Prasad Mishra versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others]., relying the decision given in the case of C.A.Bhakhare versus State of Madhya Pradesh & otheRs.1987 MPLJ 509 this Court has said that similar benefit would be applicable in the cases of persons like petitioner. Considered the su...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-31-2012
WRIT PETITION No.13916/20131. 08.2012 Shri Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. D.K. Bohre, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents-State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the services rendered by her in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by Mr. Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these writ petitions, quest...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-03-2012
WRIT PETITION No.13909/20103. 09.2012 Shri Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Deputy Government Advocate, for the respondents-State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the services rendered by him in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by Mr. Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these wri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-24-2012
WRIT PETITION No.15795/20124. 09.2012 Shri Vikas Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M. Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondents-State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the services rendered by him in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these writ petitions, question involved is common. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-05-2012
WRIT PETITION No.15854/20105. 10.2012 Shri Rakesh Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M. Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondents-State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the services rendered by him in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these writ petitions, question involved is common. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Oct-05-2012
W.P. No.16509/2012 05.10.2012 Shri Anirudh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents- State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the services rendered by them in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by Mr. Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these writ petitions, questio...
Tag this Judgment!