Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-21-2009
Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT392
ORDERS.C. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition challenging the order dated 14th January, 2009 (Annexure P-l) passed by the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 8 (5) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules, 1961') terminating the services of the petitioner. The contention of the petitioner is that she is a member of the Scheduled Tribe and she was appointed by virtue of a process of selection conducted by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission for the post of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat. The petitioner in compliance to the appointment order dated 10th January, 2006 submitted her joining on 23rd January, 2006 at Janpad Panchayat, Chachoda, District Guna and thereafter started working as the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Chachoda, District Guna. The petitioner has further stated that the Accountant of the Janp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-26-2009
Reported in : 2009CriLJ3268
S.L. Kochar, J.1. The appellants, by filing this appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have challenged their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and consequent sentence of imprisonment for life vide judgment dated 30-11-1999 passed by the learned Third Addl. Sessions Judge, Khargone in Sessions Trial No. 235/1993.2. According to the prosecution case, on 2-8-1993 on the eve of Raksha Bandhan festival in village Roshiya six coconuts were offered to Lord Bajrang Bali by the villagers through village Chowkidar Shri Ram (P.W. 2) and P.W. 8 Shankar Singh. Out of six coconuts, four were eaten by Shankar Singh on which Chowkidar Shri Ram admonished him, but Shankar Singh started picking up quarrel with Shri Ram. Shankar was admonished by village Sarpanch Prahlad Singh and complainant P.W. 1 Kamal Singh. At that moment, appellant told Kamal Singh that he (Kamal Singh) was behaving like a bullie and he (the appellant) would finish him....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : May-04-2009
Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT270
ORDERR.S. Jha, J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of W.P. No. 13957/2008 and W.P. No. 3304/2009 as the relief sought by the petitioners in both these petitions are identical.2. The petitioners, who are all resident of Village Siddhikhurd, Tehsil Singroli, District Sidhi, have challenged the notifications dated 8-8-2006 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'); 10-8-2007 issued under Section 6 of the Act; and 23-6-2008 issued under Section 17(1)(3) of the Act.3. The case of the petitioners, before this Court, is that the respondent authorities, with a view to set up the Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project, have issued the aforesaid notifications wherein, apart from the land of other villages, 427.08 hectares of land of Village Siddhikhurd is sought to be acquired including about 25 acres of land belonging to the petitioners.4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the impugned notifications are contrary t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-07-2009
Reported in : 2009CriLJ4217
A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21-8-2001 passed by learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Morena in Sessions Trial No. 306/1995 convicting the appellant No. 1 Shiv Singh under Section 304, Part I as well as under Section 326/34 of IPC and thereby sentencing him to suffer ten years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 7,000/- and in default to suffer further one year's rigorous imprisonment under Section 304, Part-I of IPC and also sentencing him to suffer three years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 3,000/- and in default to suffer further one year's rigorous imprisonment under Section 326/34 of IPC and further convicting the appellant No. 2-Narayan Singh under Sections 304, Part-I/34 and 326 of IPC and sentencing him to suffer five years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default to suffer further six months' rigorous imprisonment and also sentencing him to five years' rigorous imprisonme...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-22-2009
Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT186
R.S. Jha, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the landlord against the reversing judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court passed in Civil Appeal No. 59-A/2003, decided on 18-2-2005 whereby the judgment and decree passed by the Ninth Civil Judge, Class II, Jabalpur, in Civil Suit No. 5-A/97, decided on 22-4-2002 has been reversed and the suit filed by the landlord/plaintiff for eviction has been dismissed.2. This Court had admitted this second appeal on the following substantial question of law:(1) Whether non-examination of the plaintiff was fatal to the eviction suit, when her son Dr. Sanjeev Sarkar and his wife Dr. Rupa Sarkar were examined to prove their bona fide need3. At the time of hearing it is observed that the following additional substantial questions of law also arise for adjudication in this appeal namely:2. Whether the First Appellate Court has committed gross error of law by ignoring the extensive and cogent evidence on record in respect of bona fide need of the s...
Tag this Judgment!