Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-28-1973
Reported in : AIR1973MP261
Sen, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 39(1)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, preferred by M/s. Dilip Construction Co. from an order of the District Judge, Durg at Rajnandgaon, setting aside an award of the umpire in its favour, directing the payment of a sum of Rs. 8,65,000/- by the Hindustan Steel Ltd.2. The material facts, shortly stated, are these. By a contract dated 26th February, 1960, the appellant was employed by the respondent for winning and raising 45,00,000 Cft. of BF grade lime-stone ore from its Nandini Mines, and for transporting and loading the same into wagons at the railway siding of the mines. The deed of contract contained an arbitration clause, and it reads thus:'61. If at any time any question, dispute or difference whatsoever shall arise between the Employer and the Contractor upon or in relation to or in connection with the contract either party forthwith give to the other notice in writing of the existence of such question, dispute or difference and the sa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-21-1973
Reported in : AIR1973MP278; 1973MPLJ815
Singh, J. 1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution the petitioner calls into question an order dated 25th March 1973 passed by the Principal, Mahakoshal Arts Mahavidyalaya. Jabalpur, rusticating him for a period of two years. 2. The petitioner was a student of M. A. (Final) Philosophy in Mahakoshal Arts Mahavidyalaya, Jabalpur. A complaint was made to the Principal on 21st March, 1973 by one Mrs. Renuka Gupta, a Lecturer in Government Science College, Jabalpur, that the petitioner molested her in the College Library. On this complaint, the Principal on 22nd March, 1973 issued a notice to the petitioner to appear before him and to explain why he should not be rusticated from the college on the ground of misconduct. As the petitioner denied the charge, the Principal constituted a committee for conducting an enquiry into the complaint against the petitioner. The committee consisted of Dr. V. S. Rao, Professor and Head of the Department of economics, Professor S. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-24-1973
Reported in : AIR1974MP22
Tankha, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been directed by the petitioner. MadhyaPradesh State Road Transport Corporation, against the order dated 25-6-1973 passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Sagar (respondent No. 1) granting a temporary permit in favour of Gulabchand Jain (respondent No. 3).2. The facts of the case in brief are that earlier the respondent No. 1 had granted a temporary permit vide its order dated 25-4-1973 in favour of the respondent No. 3 for the route Sagar, Jabalpur via Rehli, Garhakota, Abhana, Teigarh and Tendukheda. This permit was valid for a period of one month with the expiry date as 25-6-1973. As it appears from the record that some persons had applied for grant of new regular permanent stage-carriage permit for the same route and those applications after being received by the respondent No. 1 had been sent for publication in the M. P. Rajpatra. In the meanwhile since the validity of the temporary grant was expiring, ...
Tag this Judgment!