Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-21-1969
Reported in : AIR1970MP132; 1969MPLJ751
Pandey, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to call up and quash by certiorari three orders: (i) one dated 15 May 1963 by which the State Government provisionally absorbed the petitioner as from 1 November 1956, on a post borne on the cadre of Overseers Electrical/Mechanical for purposes of the Unification of Pay Scales and Fixation of Pay on Absorption Rules, 1959; (ii) another dated 1 April, 1964 by which the petitioner was intimated that the Central Government had rejected his representation dated 29 December, 1961 against the provisional combined gradation list and (iii) the third dated 4 June, 1965 by which the gradation list was made final as published in the M. P. Rajpatra Extraordinary dated 18 June, 1965. The petitioner has further claimed a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order directing that the post formerly held by him in the erstwhile State of Bhopal be equated with posts higher than those held by Overseers and his pay scale be re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Feb-06-1969
Reported in : AIR1969MP229; [1970]76ITR347(MP); 1969MPLJ395
Singh, J.1. This is a case stated by the Appellate Tribunal under Section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 referring for our answer the following questions of law:'(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Muafi grant held by the deceased Sardar Narayan Rao Patankar was property within the meaning of Section 2(15) of the Act?(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Muafi grant was held by the deceased Narayan Rao Patankar for his life only?(3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Muafi grant held by the deceased Narayan Rao Patankar passed on his death within the meaning of Section 5(1)?'2. Sardar Narayan Rao Patankar, who died on 13th October, 1957, was holder of a cash Muafi of Rs. 38,844/- per annum from the Gwalior Darbar. On his death the grant of Muafi was continued by the Madhya Pradesh Government in favour of his son Trimbak Rao Alias Aditya Patankar and the name of the son under the guardianship of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-29-1969
Reported in : AIR1970MP261
A.P. Sen, J. 1. This is an appeal brought by the defendant No. 1, M/s. Mishrabandhu Karyalaya, Jabalpur and its partners, from the Judgment and decree of the 5th Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, dated 31st August 1964, decreeing against them, the plaintiff Sheoratanlal Koshal's claim (A) for recovery of Rupees 15,307.04 paise with interest @ 6% per annum thereon from the date of suit, i.e., from 1st January 1963 till realisation, due on account of the arrears of royalty payable to him on the sales effected upto the end of December 1959 of the book entitled 'Saral Middle School Ank Ganeet', written by his son-in-law Maniram Vishwakarma, the copyright of which had been assigned to him; (B) for rendition of account of the sales effected by them of the book in question and other allied publications thereof, as per the Hyderabad Syllabus or otherwise, during the years 1960, 61, 62 and until the date of accounting, so as to ascertain the amount of royalty which had accrued thereon and be...
Tag this Judgment!