Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 1999CriLJ2844
R.P. Gupta, J.1. The appellants challenge their conviction for offence punishable under Section 302/34, I.P.C. in S.T. No. 67/82 vide judgment dated 24-2-86 of Addl. Sessions Judge, Shahdol. The trial Court has found that these accused, in pursuance of their common intention, committed murder of Vipin Shrivastava on 22-6-82 at about 9 p.m. in village Chachai in the area of P.S. Amlai Distt. Shahdol.2. Apart from these appellants there was a fourth accused Ramashraya on whom the charge was of instigating the other accused to commit this murder. He has been acquitted of that charge.3. The prosecution case was that the deceased and the accused were employees of M.P.E.B. at Chachai. The deceased was an activist of I.N.T.U.C. union and the accused were members of Janta Union. Both unions were formed by the employees of the M.P.E.B. The background of this murder was that Vipin agitated in a legal manner against the management on behalf of I.N.T.U.C. union for certain demands of the employees...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT397
Ajit Singh, J. 1. Appellant Kishan, the sole accused person in this case, has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life by IInd Additional Sessions Judge to the Court of Sessions Judge, Chhindwara, vide impugned judgment dated 23-2-89 for causing the murder of Patiram, the deceased in the case. He has also been convicted under Section307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment for attempting to commit the murder of Sukhchand (P.W. 4). Both the sentences are to run concurrently. Appellant has been found guilty of causing fatal injuries on the person of deceased Patiram and causing grievous injuries to Sukhchand (P.W. 4) by means of a 'lathi' at about 9.00 a.m. on 21-4-87 at Dewardha Nala. 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to this appeal are as under :-- The appellant used to sell illicit liquor from his house. On 21-4-87 Sukhchand (P.W. 4) and Patiram, while returning after attending...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT472
N.K. Mody, J. 1. Being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 25-10-83 passed by Additional District Judge, Jhabua in Civil Suit No. 3-B/1981, whereby the suit filed by the appellants for compensation was dismissed, the present appeal has been filed.2. Short facts of the case are that the appellants who were minors filed a suit against the respondents for realization of a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- on 17-6-77 alleging that deceased Maltidevi Gidwani was the mother of the appellants and was working in the office of Animal Husbandry, Jhabua as Accountant. The salary of the deceased Maltidevi was Rs. 373/- per month. It was alleged that on 19-7-1976 Smt. Maltidevi Gidwani was hospitalized at District Hospital, Jhabua where she delivered a son Laxman. It was alleged that after the delivery Maltidevi was pressurized by respondent Nos. 5 to 7 for T.T. operation and upon her denying the deceased and her husband were threatened that the deceased and her husband shall be terminated from their job an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT196
Sushma Shrivastava, J.1. Appellant has preferred this appeal challenging his conviction and order of sentence passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in S.T. No. 36/93, decided on 5-4-94.2. Appellant has been convicted under Section 376 of IPC for committing rape on a minor girl aged about eight years and sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years by the impugned judgment.3. According to prosecution, on 21-11-92 in the evening at Motinagar, Bhopal, when complainant's daughter aged eight years (hereinafter referred to as 'victim') was playing outside her house, appellant came there and took her to cattle-shed and committed sexual intercourse with her. When she shouted, appellant intimidated and threatened her not to disclose the incident to anyone at her house. When the mother of the girl discovered the injuries oh her private part while giving bath to her, she enquired from her. The girl then narrated the incident of rape to her mother. The matter was then reported to P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2008CriLJ881
S.R. Waghmare, J.1. This appeal has been filed by appellant-Rajuwa son of Nanuram Kushwah against judgment of conviction passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Indore, dated 8-11-1994 in Sessions Trial No. 427/92, convicting the accused under Section 324 of the I.P.C. and sentencing him to three years of rigorous imprisonment.2. Brief facts as alleged by the prosecution are that Babu and accused-Rajuwa were resident of North Toda, Indore and on the date of incident i .e. 26 8-1991, Babu Sonkar and Mukesh had gone to see the Gujaria fair and were returning home at 9.30 p.m., when near the Indore Development Authority building they found the accused standing there and he had a gupti (knife) in his hand and he threatened Babu Sonkar stating that Babu Sonkar had filed report to the Police Station, M.G. Road against his friend and only stating so, he suddenly plunged the knife into the stomach of Babu, threatening him to kill. As a result of which Babu Sonker fell down on the ground bleeding ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT662
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner, an ex-service man, has called in question the pregnability of the order passed by the State Government fixing the premium in respect of the land allotted in his favour.2. The facts as have been unfurled are that the petitioner was recruited in the Indian Army as Telecom Technician in the Corps of Signals in the year 1970. He was deployed with his unit to combat 1971 Indo Pak war and had also spent considerable time on posting in field area on the territorial line of Indo Tibet Border. While serving in Indo Tibet Border he suffered severe fatal injury during Sugar Sector Operations and after sustained treatment he was declared medically unfit and was recorded as a disabled person. It is pleaded in the petition that he has been receiving regular pension as well as disability pension under the Indian Army Act and Rules framed thereunder. As averred in the writ petition the State Government issued a circular No. 2069-680-Aa-72 da...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Rakesh Saksena, J.1. This judgment shall govern the disposal of both the above appeals, since both the appeals arise out of the common impugned judgment.2. Appellants Sheikh Sayeed, Sheikh Anees and Kishore have filed the above appeals against the judgment dated 6th May, 2000 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST) and Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Special Case No. 36/99 convicting them under Sections 302, 397 read with Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sentencing them to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 5000/-, rigorous imprisonment for 7 years with fine of Rs. 3000/- and imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 10,000/- on each respectively. Appellant Rev Singh of Criminal Appeal No. 2567/2000 has been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 5000/-. Though appellants Sheikh Say...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
WRIT PETITION No.13916/20131. 08.2012 Shri Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. D.K. Bohre, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents-State. Heard on the question of admission. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the services rendered by her in the Local Body has not been considered for grant of pension treating it to be a qualifying service. It is stated by Mr. Aniruddha Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised has already been decided by this Court in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other similar connected writ petitions decided on 27.11.2003 holding that the period spent in Janpad Sabha/Municipal Bodies has to be counted as pensionable service. It is conceded at bar that matter is similar as decided in W.P. No.4919/2003 (Ram Jatan Singh vs. State of M.P. and others) and other connected matters on 27.11.2003 by this Court. This Court has passed the following order : In these writ petitions, quest...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2179/1996 Kissu & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.K.Dixit, counsel for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 21st day of September, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 13.11.1996 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol in S.T.No.69/1994, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 304 (Part-I) of IPC and sentenced for 10 years' rigorous imprisonment.2. Prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 14.11.1993, at about 3 p.m., the deceased Ramesh Baiga went to the village Mahimar to invite his friend Faggu (P.W.2) for dinner. In the evening, when the deceased along wi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 Cr.A. No.844 /2003 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.844/2003 APPELLANT: Sukhdeo S/o Anjulal Katiya, Aged about 35 years, R/o Dodasemar Koltidhana, P.S. Nawegaon, District Chhindwara Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant : Ku. Savita Chaudhary, Learned Counsel For the Respondent/State : Shri Amit Pandey Learned Panel Lawyer --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing :25. 04.2013 Date of judgment:19. 06.2013 Per: Subhash Kakade, J.(JUDGMENT) The convicted appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 10.03.2003 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara in Sessions Trial No.176/2001 has filed this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, c...
Tag this Judgment!