Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Aug-08-1990
Reported in : 1992CriLJ462; (1991)1GLR142
S.D. Dave, J.1. In this Criminal Appeal, the appellant-accused Prakashkumar Gandhi challenges the judgment of conviction and sentence pronounced by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 6 of 1984 dated 8-10-84 convicting the appellant-accused for the offences punishable Under Sections 302 & 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to the imprisonment for life for the offence punishable Under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and to R.I. for 5 years and to fine of Rs. 1000/- in default further R.I. for six months for the offence punishable Under Section 201 of the Penal Code.2. The appellant-accused Prakashkumar Gandhi stood charged for the alleged commission of the offences punishable Under Section 302 read with Section 201 of the Penal Code along with his younger brother, parents and the brother-in-law on the accusation that during the night between 15-7-83 and 16-7-83 they had administered potassium cyanide to the deceased Pravinaben who...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-17-1990
Reported in : 1991ACJ904; (1991)1GLR361; (1993)IIILLJ611Guj
Bhatt, J. 1. In this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter 'Act' for short), the appellant has assailed the judgment and award passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation ('Commissioner' for short, hereinafter), at Bhavnagar, on 10.8.1982, in an application for compensation being Workmen Compensation Application No. 10 of 1982. Various interesting points are raised and a multi prolonged attack is also made against the claim of compensation. Therefore, the appeal was heard at a marathon length. Since various significant points are raised and with a view to appreciate the merits of the present appeal and challenge against it, it would be pertinent at this juncture to set out relevant and material facts. 2. The present appellant is the original claimant who preferred an application for compensation for personal injuries sustained by him, under Section 3 of the Act. The claimant made the application for compensation of Rs. 3528/-unde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-19-1990
Reported in : II(1991)ACC342
J.N. Bhatt, J.1. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmens' Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter 'Act' for short), the appellant has assailed the judgment and award passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation ('Commissioner' for short, hereinafter), at Bhavnagar 10.8.1982, in an application for compensation being workman compensation Application No. 10 of 1982.2. Various interesting points are raised and a multi prolonged attack is also made against the claim of compensation. Therefore, the appeal was heard at a marathon length. Since various significant points are raised and with a view to appreciate the merits of the present appeal and challenge against it, it would be pertinent at this juncture to set out relevant and material facts.3. The present appellant is the original claimant who preferred an application for compensation for personal injuries sustained by him, under Section 3 of the Act. The claimant made the application for compensation of Rs. 3528/- under...
Tag this Judgment!