Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... . additionally, it is acknowledged in the pleadings, that the accused had developed an acquaintance with the child, when his mother used to visit her native place along with her son ..... . in the examination of the accused under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure, the accused acknowledged, that he used to see the child whenever the child was taken by his mother to her native village .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... above all, what is not acceptable is that, she would travel with them without any resistance from nagpur to bhopal and indore and ultimately at the native place of accused nos.4 and 5. ..... she received a phone call from accused no.1 - rekhabai mohurle while she was returning from village nilaj and therefore, she visited the native place of rekhabai at bhiwapur. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... it is the case of the claimants that the deceased was coming back at surat via khammam by train after performing some religious function at his native place and he came upto badnera and then he purchased a travel ticket from badnera to surat at badnera railway station and started his journey by special train. ..... undisputedly, the native place of the deceased was village fedmupparam, district varangal in andhra pradesh. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... it is also the case of prosecution that when the appellant returned from work for celebrating dasara at his native place, he came to know that the deceased had conceived due to illicit relations between the deceased and said satish. ..... he had also visited bhadrawati, the native place of the appellant and had recorded statements of the witnesses. ..... they decided to go to their native place bhadrawati. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 2 claims that he met with an accident and became paralysed, therefore, he was required to close down the establishment and shifted to his native place i.e. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 2 stating therein that when she was returning in a train from her native place, the applicant started talks with her and tried to develop intimacy with her and took her mobile number. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... shri jaiswal, learned counsel states that here on the day of alleged offence, the petitioner was on his duty and stolen goods (allegedly) were seized from his house located at native place paoni. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... shri jaiswal, learned counsel states that here on the day of alleged offence, the petitioner was on his duty and stolen goods (allegedly) were seized from his house located at native place paoni. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... it has also come in the evidence of p.w.5-ramdas that he had gone to his native place i.e. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
oral judgment: admitted. heard finally by consent. heard learned counsel mr.r.j. mirza, learned counsel for the applicant and mr. s.m. bhagde, learned addl. p.p. for non-applicant. 2. the applicants are accused in crime no.09/2012 of nandura police station. they are accused of the offences punishable under sections 489-a, 489-b and 489-c of the indian penal code. they are also accused of the offence punishable under section 120-b of the i.p.c. the investigation has been completed. the charge-sheet has been filed which is pending in the court vide charge sheet no.71/2012. the applicants feel aggrieved by the order dated 15.12.2012. the applicants have been granted bail in the sum of rs. 1 lakh each and have been directed to execute pr bond of rs. 1 lakh and surety bond of rs. 1 lakh each. in addition to this, the applicants are also directed to deposit cash security of rs. 1 lakh each. it appears that the learned trial court wanted solvent surety as well as cash security only because the applicants are the natives of west bengal. in my considered opinion, that cannot be a ground for passing such an onerous order. this order, in other words, may amount to refusal of bail. in the circumstances, the order needs to be modified. hence, the order dated 15th december 2012 is modified as under:- "the applicants be released on bail in the sum of rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh) each with one solvent surety in the like amount." the application stands disposed of accordingly.
Tag this Judgment!