Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national tax tribunal act 2005 Court: chhattisgarh Page 8 of about 105 results (0.091 seconds)

Hermit Singh Sethi Vs. B.M.W. India Private Limited and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... o.p.nos.1 to 3 did not properly give response and the vehicle was not repaired timely and the approach of the ops are casual and due to negligent act of the ops, the complainant suffered lot of mental agony and the ops had given false assurance to the complainant that the vehicle would be handed over to him after repairing works within stipulated time. ..... 2014 (1) cpr 240 (nc), hon'ble national commission observed that consumer protection act, 1986 sections 15, 17, 19 and 21 automobile manufacturing defect district forum directed ops to get vehicle repaired all defects mentioned in expert report, free of cost, deliver vehicle to complainant free of all defects and pay rs.10,000/- as compensation ..... the complainant has filed this complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the opposite parties for seeking direction to the opposite parties : (a) to pay the price of the b.m.w. ..... maruti udyog limited and others, appeal no.199 of 2005 decided by union territory consumer disputes redressal commission, ut chandigarh on12.04.2006; tata aig general insurance co. ..... schedule 1 is vehicle inventory slip, schedule 2 is job card copy of munich motors, schedule 3 is insurance final approval document, schedule 4 is purchase order dated 02.08.2013, schedule 5 to 7 are copies of email sent, schedule 8 is tax invoice dated 12.07.2013, schedule 9 is insurance liability details. 13. ..... p-2 is tax invoice of munich motors, document ex. .....

Srei. Equipment Finance Private Limited, Through : Manager Vs. Ibrahim ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the supreme court has discussed the term consumer in the celebrated authority reported in laxmi engineering works v psg industrial institute, ii (1995) cpj 1 (sc) = 1995 3 scc 583, wherein it was held : the national commission appears to have been taken a consistent view that where a person purchases goods with a view to using such goods for carrying on any activity on a large scale for the purpose of earning profit, he will not be ..... the national commission further held that notwithstanding such findings, the respondent was entitled to maintain a complaint under the act with respect to the deficiency in service during one-year warranty period with respect to the said goods relying on section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the act. 12. ..... by its order dated 17.12.2009, which is impugned here, the national commission reversed the order of the state commission and held that the ..... is true that the word 'resale' used in the exclusionary clause of section 2(1)(d) (i) was used in connection with the purchase of goods defined in the sale of goods act for commercial purpose the ultimate object of the supply of the goods, namely, g.p. ..... orders of all tribunals stand set aside. ..... ) by the amitabh shrivastava on 03.10.2012, track result for rc009815776in, tax invoice,, to whom it may concern,, letter dated 27.03.2012 sent by srei equipment ..... , iv (2005) cpj 206 (nc) = 2006 (1) cpr 164 (nc), is ill-placed since the present dispute has arisen after the amendment of section 2(1)(d)(i) containing definition of a consumer .....

Govind Warkade Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT75(CG)

..... it is clear from the reply dated 12-1-2002, pursuant to the memo dated 5-1-2005 (annexure p-3), submitted by the petitioner and subsequently letter dated 18-2-2002 issued by the respondent no. ..... the hon'ble supreme court, in the case of punjab national bank v. ..... prothonotary & senior master : (2005)illj561sc , the hon'ble supreme court held that:even though the rule as such does not contemplate giving an opportunity to the appellant delinquents before the disciplinary authority takes a final decision to disagree with .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bodali Bai and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009ACJ2213

..... for any passenger travelling in a goods vehicle, the insurers would not be liable therefor.in asha rani's case, : 2003 acj 1 (sc), it has been noticed that sub-clause (i) of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 147 of the 1988 act speaks of liability which may be incurred by the owner of a vehicle in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person or damage to any property of a third party caused by or arising out of the use of vehicle in a public place ..... , was a party, however, bear repetition:(26) in view of the changes in the relevant provisions in the 1988 act vis-a-vis the 1939 act, we are of the opinion that the meaning of the words 'any person' must also be attributed having regard to the context in which they have been used, i.e ..... 14 and 10 of 2000 were filed by the parents of both deceased respectively for compensation before second additional motor accidents claims tribunal (ftc), manendragarh, korba (herein after referred to as 'the m.a.c.t.').3. ..... the decision of the apex court in national insurance co. ..... , from its vicarious liability for the act of its driver/employee of carrying of passengers in the truck while returning from the ..... bommithi subbhayamma : 2005 acj 721 (sc), also applies with full force to the case in hand, in which, it has been held that in such a case the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation first to the claimants and then to recover it ..... bommithi subbhayamma : 2005 acj 721 (sc); oriental insurance co ..... , 21.10.2005, owner of the truck no .....

Satjas Glorocks Private Ltd Vs. Bharat Aluminum Company Limited

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the arbitral award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or (v) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision of this part from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing such agreement, was ..... date on which the party making that application had received the arbitral award or, if a request had been made under section 33, from the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal: provided that if the court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the said period of three months it may entertain the application within a further period of ..... ) was also a party, it was held that when the arbitrator or the umpire as the case may be, had ignored the specific terms or had acted beyond the four corners of the contract, it was open for the court in the exercise of its power under section 30 of the act to set aside the award on the ground that the arbitrator could not ignore the law or misapply the terms of the contract in order to do what he ..... also failed to make payments regarding labour-charges, provident-fund, pension-deposits, workers' wages/remuneration and panchayat-tax, which, it required to do in terms of the agreement. ..... , (2005) 6 .....

Chief Manager, M/S. Fine India Company Private Limited and Another Vs. ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... apposite to observe that while deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly belated petitions filed against the orders ..... apposite to observe that while deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly belated petitions filed against the orders ..... chivade, first appeal no.436 of 2005 decided by the national commission on 25th january, 2008. ..... therefore, the word "sufficient" embraces no more than that which provides a platitude, which when the act done suffices to accomplish the purpose intended in the facts and circumstances existing in a case, duly examined from the view point of a reasonable standard ..... 63 (sc), has explained the scope of condonation of delay in a matter where the special courts / tribunals have been constituted in order to provide expeditious remedies to the person aggrieved and consumer protection act, 1986 is one of them. .....

Smt. Sunder Bai and Another Vs. Loop Singh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... sunder bai and narottam are concerned, the claimants for the reasons best known to them did not examine any doctor before the tribunal for establishing the number and nature of the injuries said to have been sustained by the claimants in the motor accident and the fact that those injuries resulted in any ..... nande, learned counsel for respondent no.3, national insurance company limited, the insurer of the offending vehicle tractor, on the other hand supported the award and contended that the amounts of compensation awarded by the tribunal cannot be termed as inadequate so as to warrant enhancement in this ..... 08 c6845; as the above offending vehicle tractor on the date of the accident was insured with the national insurance company limited and the insurance company could not establish any breach of the policy conditions, the insurance company was liable to pay compensation to ..... the question whether the medical certificate produced by the claimant before the tribunal without examining the doctor who issued the certificate can be relied upon as substantive evidence for the assessment of the compensation came up for consideration before the apex court in the case of ..... in absence of any contention having been raise din regard to the applicability of the workmens compensation act which, in our opinion, ex facie has no application, the same in our opinion, cannot be permitted to be raised for the first ..... thirupal reddy, reported in (2005) 12 scc 189, wherein it was observed in para 6 as .....

Phoolu Bai and Others Vs. Bittu Dubey and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... of the compensation awarded by the 13th additional motor accident claims tribunal, raipur (for short the tribunal') vide award dated 04.02.2005, passed in claim case no.52/2004.2) as against the compensation of rs.4,45,000/-, claimed by the appellants/claimants, unfortunate mother-in-law and children of deceased rukhmani, by filing a claim petition under section 163-a of the motor vehicles act, for her death in the motor accident on 16.07.2003, the tribunal awarded a total sum of rs.1,74,500/- as compensation along with interest ..... income at rs.15,000/- per annum only; and in awarding low compensation of rs.1,74,500/- only.7) shri dashrath gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.3, the national insurance company limited, insurer of the offending vehicle minibus, on the other hand supported the award and contended that the compensation of rs.1,74,500/- awarded by the tribunal is just and proper compensation in the facts and circumstances of the present case.8) in a motor accident claim case what is important is that the ..... on the date of the accident was insured with the national insurance company limited, and the insurance company could not establish any breach of the policy conditions, the insurance company was liable to pay the compensation to the claimants.4) as the respondents have not filed any appeal against the award, the above findings recorded by the tribunal have now attained finality.5) the tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at rs.15,000/- per .....

Bhartiya Jeevan Beema Nigam and Another Vs. Geetanjali Goswami

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the respondent had filed a complaint under section 207 of the companies act on the ground that the dividends declared by the company had not been paid within the prescribed time. ..... sangli sahakari bank ltd (supra), hon'ble national commission has observed thus :- "5. ..... this court held that section 207 of the companies act casts an obligation on the company to pay the dividend, which is declared, to the shareholders within 42 days from its declaration. ..... , (1955) 1 scr 185 : air 1954 sc 429 the question was whether the respondent therein, which was a non-resident company, could be said to have received payment in india for the purposes of the income tax act. ..... the national commission was right in giving to the appellant liberty to move the civil court. ..... ravinder kumar shukla and others, (2005) 7 supreme court cases 428. 7. ..... in the case of op no.24 of 2005 titled as v.s. ..... on 02.05.2005, govardhan puri goswami died and on 01.07.2011, rahul puri also died. .....

Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda Vs. Nagen Verman and Another

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... , iii (2012) cpj 553 (nc), hon'ble national commission has observed that finance company is well within its right to seize the vehicle as per the agreement. 14. ..... , 2012 (4) cpr 75 (nc), hon'ble national commission has observed thus : "6. ..... , iii (2012) cpj 553 (nc), hon'ble national commission has observed thus : "3. ..... subhankar singh (supra), hon'ble national commission observed that : "9. ..... this view is supported by national commission in the case of surendra kumar agrawal v. ..... commissioner, v (2005) slt 195 = iii (2005) ccr 8 (sc) = cce 2005 (4) scc 146." 13. ..... the national commission, in case reported in surendra kumar agrawal v. ..... commissioner, v (2005) slt 195 = iii (2005) ccr 8 (sc) = cce 2005 (4) scc 146." 16. ..... appellant / op bank specifically pleaded in his written version that the complainant / respondent did not deposit the amount, therefore the appellant / op bank proceeded for auction under section 13 of sarfaesi act. 20. .....