Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
..... 355 to 358 of complaint file, wherein, it was stated that vinod kumar and chander shekhar, security guards were not on duty on the day of occurrence and no incident of theft had occurred or no outsiders come in the premises of the factory in the night of 07.12.20007, the earlier statements were made under the pressure of the officials of ..... oriental insurance company , iii (2008) cpj 63 sc, is also applicable in the present case, wherein it was held that the insurance company being in a dominant p often act in an unreasonable manner and after having accepted the value of a particular insured goods that very figure on one pretext or the other when they are called upon to pay compensation. ..... raghu nand chaudhary had also placed reliance upon various judgments of honble apex court, honble national commission and honble state commission viz:- i) vikram greentech (i) ltd. ..... anneuxre c-21 had intimated that since offence under section 427 ipc is made out, which is non-cognizable, as such, the company should take action at their own end and no further action is to be taken by the police. 23. ..... that the loss of labsa oil had been caused and offence under section 427 ipc had been made out and d.d. no. ..... as per form 154 has been registered under and no ipc section has been charged. ..... pw4/b, in the daily diary to the effect that this was a case of some unknown passer-by having meddled with the tanks causing huge loss to the tune of rs.35.00 lacs and this being an offence, under section 427 i.p.c. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla
..... in this background, present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed for deficiency of service/unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties, wherein direction had been sought for paying the assured sum of deceased-husband of complainant alongwith interest and apart ..... also taken the same view since the insured in that case was suffering from a serious disease of portal hypertension and cirrhosis which was not disclosed at the time of taking of insurance policy, as such the national commission concluded that the claim was rightly repudiated by the insurance company. 16. ..... the provisions of evidence act are not applicable in the proceedings under the consumer protection act, 1986 in its letter and spiti whereas these documents have been supplied from the official custody of regional manager, hrtc, kullu vide annexure rw.3 to the life insurance corporation of india, as such they cannot be legally discarded in ..... chako and another versus chairman life insurance corporation of india and others, (2008) 1 supreme court cases 321 as well as decisions of this commission in first appeal no.255/2009, titled life insurance corporation of india and others versus nirmala devi, decided on 9.8.2011 and first appeal no.52/2009 titled life insurance corporation of ..... it may serve the purpose of social security but then the same should not be obtained with a fraudulent act by the insured. .....
Tag this Judgment!