Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national security guard act 1986 section 53 punishment of officers of or below the rank of squadron commanders by officers not below the rank of inspectors general Page 1 of about 2 results (0.135 seconds)

Ex-Armymen's Protection Services Private Limited, through Its Managing ...

Court : Patna

Reported in : AIR2010Pat69

..... when the said writ petition was taken up, initially no interim protection was granted to the petitioner as apparently the action was taken on ground of national security but when repeated adjournments did not result in the respondents filing counter affidavit, this court was persuaded to pass an interim order on 9.2.2009 in the writ petition (annexure 9). ..... the reason is not of any national security but apparently is that disclosing the ground would cause serious embarrassment to the authority, who took the decision. ..... without mentioning the fact verbatim all that i can say is that merely because petitioner has good relation with political leaders or has body guards can be no ground for threat of national security. ..... petitioner - company is a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act incorporated in the year 2006 having its registered office at patna formed, inter alia, with the object of providing ground handing services at aerodromes. ..... the only ground given in the said communication is that the competent authority has decided to withdraw the security clearances on grounds of safe guarding of civil aviation operations and national interest. ..... section 5 whereof authorizes the central government to make rule, inter alia, for securing the safety of aircraft operation as well as the licensing, inspection and regulation of aerodromes. ..... director general of civil aviation, delhi and ors. .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. D.S. Ahluwalia

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ587

..... cannot not be ignored that the law officers in the bsf had been getting pay scales different from the those of the law officers of coast guard and national security guards right since the very inception from 1965 upto august 24, 1998, when a decision was taken by the government that the existing incumbents will be appointed against the upgraded posts only when they fulfill the requirement of the amended recruitment rules and the post would be operative in the present grade till regular appointments were made in the newly created posts in the ..... they were equated later on with the corresponding general duty officers for the purpose of bsf act and the rules, but they were not entitled to pay scales which were applicable to the general duty officers as they had been drawing the pay scales applicable to law officers working in the ministry of law and justice. ..... this was a case concerning the claim of inspectors, sub-inspectors and constables of paramilitary organisations like itbp, crpf, bsf and armed rifles and c1sf, working in the central police organization (cpo) who alleged discrimination against them on being paid a lower salary than the officers of similar ranks working in delhi police, intelligence bureau (ib) and central bureau of investigation ..... earlier, in the present case the high court has not even made any attempt to compare the nature of duties and responsibilities of the two sections of employees, one in the state secretariat and the other in the central secretariat. .....

14 Penn Plaza Llc Vs. Pyett

Court : US Supreme Court

..... or future employee by reason of race, creed, color, age, disability, national origin, sex, union membership, or any other characteristic protected by law, including, but not limited to, claims made pursuant to title vii of the civil rights act, the americans with disabilities act, the age discrimination in employment act, the new york state human rights law, the new york city human rights code, or any other similar laws, rules, ..... with the union s consent, 14 penn plaza engaged spartan security, a unionized security services contractor and affiliate of temco, to provide licensed security guards to staff the ..... not positioned to resolve in the first instance respondents claim that the cba allows the union to prevent them from effectively vindicating their federal statutory rights in the arbitral forum, given that this question would require resolution of contested factual allegations, was not fully briefed here or below, and is not fairly encompassed within the ..... union may agree to the inclusion of an arbitration provision in a collective-bargaining agreement in return for other concessions from the employer, and courts generally may not interfere in this ..... respondents immediately appealed the ruling under 16 of the faa, which authorizes an interlocutory appeal of an order refusing a stay of any action under section 3 of this title or denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order ..... it owns and operates the new york city office building where, prior to august 2003, respondents .....

Brig. V.Jaikumar Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... national security guards (nsg) was set up in the year 1984 and is a fully deputationist force. ..... 03/11/2008 (fn).the period of deputation of above officer in the nsg shall be for a period of three years from the date of assumption of charge of the post or until his retirement or superannuation from army service, whichever is earlier or till further orders and the officer will be governed in terms of mhas letter no.3/1(i)/(ii)/84-nsg dated 28.05.1985 as amended from time to time.while on deputation with the nsg, the officer shall be governed in accordance with the provisions contained in nsg act 1986 and the rules made there under. ..... as per the petitioner, when he was on leave he learnt that the file was being processed for his repatriation without following the process of the matter being considered in the office of the director general. ..... as regards the plea of the petitioner that a proper procedure was not followed to process the file in which decision was taken to curtail the deputation of the petitioner, with reference to annexure r-5, it has been highlighted that the decision was taken by the director general nsg. ..... as per the petitioner he was able to conceptualize an information system that would meet nsgs operational needs and the concept paper was not only reviewed but even accepted with commendation by the director general nsg. .....

Ullas Sahu and Etc. Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1988CriLJ32

..... the three writ applications which are in the nature of habeas corpus arise out of the same incident leading to the passing of the impugned orders of detention (annexure-1 to each of the writ applications) by the district magistrate, cuttack, under section 3(2) of the national security act, 1980 (for short 'the act ..... india : 1975crilj1648 , a case under the maintenance of internal security act where the provisions for detention are almost identical with the provisions of the national security act.in this case, the relevant observation which is sought to be relied upon reads thus:.furthermore, since the order is based on grounds to be served on the detenu, the order of detention can be passed only if the grounds are in existence and are prepared ..... the detention would be void.the recent amendment of the act by act 60 of 1984 inserting section 5a also weakens this submission by making the following provision:(b)'the government or officer making the order of detention shall be deemed to have made the order of detention under the said section after being satisfied as provided in that section with reference to the remaining ground or grounds.it is, therefore, not possible to accept the contention of shri pasayat that the law mandates the detaining authority to sign the grounds in support of the order of detention simultaneously.the expresssion 'contemporaneous' used in the supreme court decision does not ..... ramchandran) and 1986 (1) crimes 124 : 1986 all lj 1172 (guru charan .....

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

..... section 8 provides that the state government may make rules consistent with this act providing for the exercise by any officer of the home guards of the powers conferred by section 4 on the commandant and the commandant general providing certain eventualities.in exercise of the powers conferred by sec. ..... however, when tension escalates on the border and where a great threat to national security is apprehended, the border wing home guards are not allowed to leave even for two months. ..... circumstances, that on embodiment as well as during the period of training, they are receiving honorarium equivalent to the prescribed pay and allowances at the minimum scale appropriate to their ranks and trades in the state armed police force.10.16a it was also stated in the said affidavit that the members of a voluntary organization of home guards cannot be compared with the members of state armed police in terms of: (i) the actual nature of duty, (ii) nature of permanent employment, and (iii) spread over of the employment and duty period etc. ..... it has also been admitted by the respondents that the border wing home guards have worked as auxiliary to border security force from 1986 to 1992. ..... it is hardly for a few days during the period from 1986 to 1992 that some of the petitioners were posted in the out-post area of khavda or lakhpat etc. .....

Gazi Khan Alias Chotia Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1990(1)WLN470

..... act, 1985 (61 of 1985), or any rule or order made, or any condition of any licence, term or authorisation issued, thereunder and includes:(1) financing, directly of indirectly, any of the aforementioned activities;(2) abetting or conspiring in the furtherance of or in support of doing any of the aforementioned activities; and(3) harbouring persons engaged in any of the aforementioned activities.section 3 empowers the central or state government or any officer of the central government, not below the rank of a joint secretary so authorised or in the case of the state government not below the rank of secretary so authorised to detain such person section 5 lays down the ..... general, appearing for the respondents, submitted that the petitioner was earlier detained under section 3(2) of the national security act, 1980 and he was released not on the merits but on the technical objection that the district magistrate was not a detaining authority under the national security act and the grounds for detaining may be good grounds under the cofeposa act but not under the national security act ..... 1986 and a case was registered against one nihal khan but he is absconding and from the record it was found that the detenu was also involved in it on the basis of the statement of one gaji khan son of basant resident of choudhariyan, in which be has said that in the heroin seized by the ..... unlike punitive detention which is to punish for wrong done is to protect the society by preventive wrong being done .....

NLRB Vs. Burns Int'l Security Svcs., Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 278 [burns] performing plant protection duties as determined in section 9(b)(3) of the [national labor relations] act at lockheed, ontario international airport, excluding office clerical employees, professional employees, supervisors, and all other employees as defined in the act. ..... both burns and wackenhut had numerous security guard jobsites in southern california; for administrative purposes, wackenhut treated each jobsite as a separate unit, while burns treated large numbers of them together. ..... burns' actions in this regard would be subject to the commands of the labor management relations act, and to the regulation of the board under proper application of governing principles. ..... 301 doubted that a determination as to successorship will vary with different fact situations, some general concept of the reason for the successorship doctrine is essential in order to determine the importance of the various factual combinations and permutations that may or may not call for its application. ..... burns merely hired enough of wackenhut's employees to require it to bargain with the union as commanded by 8(a)(5) and 9(a). .....

Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR769; 2006(6)BomCR493

..... thereafter at the end of this scrutiny sheet, the desk officer and the deputy secretary have made a report as follows:having seen the information from clauses 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20 and 21 from paragraph 3, we are of the view that it will not be proper to grant exemption to m/s.industrial guards services private limited under section 23 of the maharashtra private security guards (regulation of employment and welfare) act. 14. ..... in paragraph 1(h) thereof, he has referred to the report of inspection when the inspector of the board visited the establishment of respondent no. ..... it states that the wages of the employees concerned are to be deposited by opening an account in a nationalized bank. ..... thereafter the file contains a photo copy of a printed note below which the then minister of state for labour shri hemant deshmukh and the then cabinet minister for labour shri satish charturvedi have signed on 3rd april 2003. .....

Alsecure and Protection Services (i) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4111

..... section 3 of that act empowers the state government to designate, by notification, an officer not below the rank of a joint secretary for the purpose of the act. ..... section 3 of the act then gives powers to the state government to make a scheme or schemes for ensuring an adequate supply and full and proper utilisation of the security guards in factories and establishments, and generally for making better provisions for the terms and conditions of employment of the security guards, to provide for the registration of employers engaging them as well as of the security guards and for making a provision for the welfare of the security guards. ..... section 17 provides that no court will take cognizance of any offence made punishable by a scheme or of any abatement thereof, except on a complaint in writing by an inspector or by a person specially authorised in that behalf by the board or the state government. ..... 2773 of 2006 dated 12th january, 2007 in the case of national textile corporation (south maharashtra) ltd. ..... 2773 of 2006 dated 12-1-2007 in the case of national textile corporation v. .....