Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national security guard act 1986 chapter i preliminary Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 321 results (0.111 seconds)

Mar 24 2004 (HC)

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

..... procedure applicable to, any court or other authority under the army act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the air force act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the border security force act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the coast guard act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the national security guard act, 1986 (47 of 1986).(2) for the removal of doubts ..... , it is hereby declared that for the purposes of any such law as is referred to in sub-section (1), the court of a special judge shall be deemed to be a court of ordinary criminal justice.sub-section (1) of section 25 clearly provides that nothing in said act ..... specific provision which requires the judge advocate to attend the meeting of the court martial for deciding whether the accused was guilty. under the said navy act, the trial judge advocate cannot sit with court martial, when the court is considering the finding. moreover there is no provision of disqualification of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1982 (HC)

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

..... is to be imposed. the purpose is to meet the costs of operating the scheme and to provide different benefits, facilities and amenities to the registered security guards as stated in the act and the scheme. so long as the amount so levied is expended on the said purposes and for no other, and so long further the amount ..... the board as and when directed to do so.38. we have an important provision in clause 27 prohibiting a registered employer from engaging a security guard other than a registered security guard or directly employed security guard. an exception is made to this rule of prohibition in certain circumstances. one of the circumstance is that the work is emergently required to ..... spy over the trade union activities. the last of the grounds given by the tribunal was a theoretical one, viz. that it was necessary in the interests of national peace and harmony to do so. the court further found that there was no legal or factual basis for the direction given by the tribunal. it may however .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2006 (HC)

Janhit Manch and Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR110; 2007(1)BomCR329

..... circumvent these prescriptions by considering two small tenements into a single medium sized apartment after the occupancy certificate is secured. we have proposed certain provisions to discourage this tendency and believe resort to this expedient will be marginal. ..... bombay, 1991'. petitioner no. 1 claims as an n.g.o. espousing legal issues concerning the state and the nation before the concerned authorities for resolution, in the larger public interest. the second petitioner is a resident of juhu ..... companies and dock companies) it is right that the courts should jealously watch the exercise of these powers, and guard against their unnecessary or unreasonable exercise to the public disadvantage. but, when the court is called upon to consider ..... 1995. some dates and events:(i) 24th october 1995 : ordinance was issued amending slum areas (improvement clearance and rehabilitation) act, (slums act) and chapter 1(a) was added. under chapter 1 (a), the government was empowered under section 3(a) to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2001 (HC)

Rambhau Patil, Secretary, National Fish Workers' Forum and Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR385; 2002(1)BomCR76

..... clearly in breach of the relevant notifications issued by the government of india, ministry of environment and forests, under section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, read with rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986.in this connection, it was submitted that the notification dated 27th january, 1994 ..... year 1974, an authority, viz., the bombay metropolitan regional development authority ('bmrda' for short), was constituted under the provisions of the bombay metropolitan regional development act, 1977 for the overall development of bombay metropolitan region and for co-ordinating, supervising and development of areas under different local authorities. on 7th march, 1977 ..... project. all the writ petitions have been filed by way of public interest litigation.it is alleged that after the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 came into force, the bombay municipal corporation, being the planning authority of the city of bombay, published a draft plan, and invited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2007 (HC)

Harinarayan G. Bajaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through Secretary, Mini ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR604; 2008(2)BomCR780; [2009]147CompCas579(Bom); [2008]82SCL79(Bom)

..... agency v. chief controller of imports and exports) : [1961]1scr305 . in that case under the indo french agreement entered into by and between the two nations on 1111954, the entire administration of french settlement vested in the government of india. the territory of pondicherry, thus, became a free port without any restriction in ..... 1997 regulations. 90. mr. chagla has placed reliance on the decision rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in raghunath rai bareja and anr. v. punjab national bank and ors. : (2007)2scc230 so as to demonstrate how and in what manner a statute has to be interpreted and that ordinarily, courts should not ..... rights in respondent no. 3. also, the securities of respondent no. 3 which are registered under the securities contract (regulation) act with the indian stock exchanges are its shares and not other securities. therefore, it is their case that the petitioner'scontention that mitsui and early guard have acted in concert or acquired voting rights in respondent no .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2008 (HC)

Dr. Anahita Pandole Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Depart ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR72; 2008(3)BomCR516; (2008)110BOMLR1555

..... high court that there is no safety hazards involved and high court shall consider such request on merits of each case. it may also be mentioned here that under the national highway act, no structures can be raised within 30 metres of brim of the road. all these legal provisions and judgments of the courts are indicative of the sensitivity towards public ..... /(b) submission of bank guarantee for an amount equivalent to 90% amount of security deposit of 50% tender amount i.e. occupancy charges being the guarantee towards requisite charges for the second year. rs. 2,43,00,000the aforesaid payment shall be made in ..... ) advertisement fees for the period from 21.5.2007 to 20.5.2008 i.e. for 1st year. rs. 11,54,400/34(iii) 25% security deposit against advertisement fees. rs. 2,66,400/(iv) 10% security deposit towards 50% tender amount i.e. occupancy charges in d.d. or pay order rs. 27,00,000/total rs. 5,81,0,800 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1989 (HC)

Deepak Nathuram Ambekar Vs. V.K. Saraf (Shri), Commissioner of Police ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR175

..... .'6. after mentioning the various facts, which we have summarised above, the detaining authority then proceeds to say that in pursuance of section 8 of the national security act, he communicates to the petitioner the grounds on which the detention order has been passed by him. thereafter in five lengthy paragraphs, the detaining authority has ..... dated 24th of may, 1989 passed by the commissioner of police, greater bombay, under section 3 of the national security act. as the order mentions, the petitioner has been detained with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order. along with the order of detention, the grounds ..... as follows :---'thus i am satisfied that you were habitually committing offences involving breach of public order and you are so desperate and dangerous being a security hazard to the community; chapter proceedings under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure were initiated against you on 28-7-1988. in the wake .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2009 (HC)

Dighi Koli Samaj Mumbai Rahivasi Sangh (Regd.) Through Its Secretary S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR97; 2009(111)BomLR2842

..... and laches. the other respondents including respondent no. 3 have raised the plea that the petitioners could have approached the concerned authority under the national environment appellate authority act, 1997 raising the grievance. it is the case of the respondents that the expansion and/or development of a port is permissible activity ..... community, as opposed to the particular interest of the individuals, must be regarded as a public purpose'. the expression 'interest of the general public' embraces public security, public order and public morality. emperor v. jeshingbhai ishwarlal dhobi : air1950bom363 . it will not be out of place to mention here something about 'public policy ..... the constitution, many larger disputes or issues demand judicial intervention and the rule of law requires to ensure that all persons are able to live securely under rule the of law, to promote within the proper limits of the judicial functions and observance and attainment of human rights and administer the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2001 (HC)

Shri Vinod Vithal Rane Vs. Shri R.H. Mendonca and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)537; (2001)2BOMLR307; 2001(2)MhLj437

..... the purview of sections 109 and 110 of the criminal procedure code and therefore the petitioner should have been properly proceeded under those sections than under section 3 of the maintenance of national security act, 1971. in para 4 of the decision, the apex court, considered the said question and has observed thus :-the preventive detention provided by the ..... persons accused of commission of offences and, for prevention of offences, is not found adequate for dealing with the situation for effectively preventing, in the interest of national security etc. the commission of prejudicial acts in future, that the provisions of this act were enacted and are intended to be utilised. if, therefore, for any reason it is not possible to successfully try and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2016 (HC)

Blue Coast Hotels Limited Vs. IFCI Limited

Court : Mumbai

..... and by the intervenors on 8 march 2016. relevant provisions:- 29. the basic provisions are:- the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 (sarfaesi act):- section 2. definitions:-..... "(f) "borrower" means any person who has been granted financial assistance by any bank or financial institution or who has given ..... 103 of the wp) recorded the argument of bchl that the possession notice includes an amount which is not a debt within the meaning of the rddb act/sarfaesi act. it also records the submission of ifci that it has included the amount due under the buyback obligation for investment made by ifci in silver resort hotel ..... ) is also challenged. specific prayers made against respondent no.1 to deposit the entire amount of rs.515.44 crores and prayed, same be invested in nationalized bank and alternatively prayed to deposit the amount arrived at by deducting the claim as due by respondent no.1 in 13(2) notice. the injunctions are .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //