Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national institutes of technology act 2007 section 3 definitions Court: delhi Page 1 of about 231 results (0.086 seconds)

Jul 08 2013 (HC)

Rajni Agarwal Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... it is further submitted by the counsel for the respondent that the respondent is governed by the national institute of fashion technology act, 2006.7. ..... she appeared for the entrance test for seeking admission to the himachal pradesh branch of national institute of fashion technology (nift). ..... the said institute is a national institution with fifteen centres ..... the court cannot lose track of the fact that in the application made before the institute the petitioner had stated that she is allergic to saw dust and in the written submission made it is stated that she is allergic to plaster of paris while in the writ petition there is mention of neither ..... it is also the case of the respondent that in case the prayer of the petitioner is accepted it would cause serious impediment in running of the institute and granting relaxation to the petitioner would be extremely unjust to other similarly placed students. ..... counsel for the respondent further submits that the policies of the respondent have been formulated as per the provisions of the act and the petitioner has failed to point out any cogent reason which would require interference with the functioning, order or policies of the respondent ..... it is a well-reputed institute, nationally and internationally, where exemplary standards of education are imparted and ..... counsel further submits that under section 7 of the nift act 2006 the board of governors have been empowered inter-alia to frame rules and regulations for managing the institution. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

D.K. Rangra Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the nift an institute of national importance, was set-up and later became subject to an act of parliament national institute of fashion technology act, 2005 (hereafter called the act ). ..... the issue involved is the claim for consideration for appointment to the post of director in the national institute of fashion technology (nift), kangra.2. ..... he also stated that the respondents acted illegally in not considering him for appointment as director to other centres along with other eligible applicants. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

D.K. Rangra Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the nift an institute of national importance, was set-up and later became subject to an act of parliament national institute of fashion technology act, 2005 (hereafter called the act ). ..... the issue involved is the claim for consideration for appointment to the post of director in the national institute of fashion technology (nift), kangra.2. ..... he also stated that the respondents acted illegally in not considering him for appointment as director to other centres along with other eligible applicants. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2019 (HC)

Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...

Court : Delhi

..... college to be allotted a seat on 23.6.2019 and the counseling round on 27.6.2019, the petitioner was allotted the maulana azad national institute of technology, bhopal and was given five days time for document verification at the regional centre ..... 10+2 level examination or passed 10+3 diploma examination with mathematics as compulsory subject with at least 50% marks in aggregate.". footnote : the principal regulations were published in the gazette of india, part iii, section 4, dated the 26th march, 1983 and subsequently amended and published in the gazette of lidia (i) dated the 27th august, 1983, (ii) dated the 7th january, 2006, (iii) dated the 19th may, ..... . (supra) and related to the same notification dated 12.2.2019 as issued by the central government in exercise of its powers conferred under section 45 read with section 21 of the architects act, 1972 minimum standards of architectural education) regulations, 1983, and also related to the aspect of the petitioners of that case having contended that in as much as they had ..... (e), (g), (h), and (j) of sub-section (2) of section 45 read with section 21 of the architects act, 1972 (20 of 1972), the council of architecture, with the approval of the central government, hereby makes the following regulations further to amend the council of architecture (minimum standards of architectural education) regulations, 1983, the same having been published in the gazette of india, .part-iii- section-4 dated the 26th march, 1983, namely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2018 (HC)

Mohit Sharma vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

..... petitioner an australian citizen and an overseas citizen of india (oci) has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondent be directed to provide scholarship to the petitioner for the remainder of his undergraduate course in national institute of technology, new delhi, in terms of the scholarship programme for diaspora children (hereafter spdc scheme ). ..... in 2016, the petitioner secured admission in national institute of technology, new delhi (hereafter nit delhi ) under the dasa scheme. ..... national institutes of technology (nits), schools of planning and architecture and indian institutes of information technology (iiits) through dasa scheme. ..... are citizens of other countries (except pakistan and bangladesh) but at any time held an indian passport, or either of his/her parent or any of his/her grandparent was a citizen of india by virtue of provisions of the constitution of india or section 2(b) of the citizenship act, 1955 (act no.57 of 1955). ..... definitions about these four categories are given below: b. ..... introduction india government of launched a scheme called scholarship programme for diaspora children (spdc), in the academic year 2006-2007, for the wards of persons of indian origin (pios) and non-resident indians (nris) to assist them in pursuing under graduate courses in indian universities/institutions.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2011 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Sud and ors Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... before concluding, let me refer to statute 11 of the statutes framed under section 3(k) of the institutes of technology act, 1961, for an argument was sought to be raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners basing himself on the said statute. ..... , that in the light of existing shortage in teaching positions in the centrally funded institutions in higher and technical education, and in the context of governments decision to expand the capacities of such institutions for increasing access to higher education, it had been decided that the age of superannuation of all persons who are holding teaching positions on regular employment against sanctioned posts as on march 15, 2007 in any of the centrally funded institutions in higher and technical educations shall be increased from 62 to 65 years. ..... it cannot, thus, be said that the decision which was taken by the government of india as a national level policy to give the benefit of enhancement of age of superannuation from 62 to 65 years to "all persons who were holding regular teaching positions on regular employment against sanctioned posts as on 15.03.2007 in any of the centrally funded higher and technical educations under this ministry ", was contrary to the prevailing situation. 8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2014 (HC)

Meenakshi College of Pharmacy and Research Centre Vs. All India Counci ...

Court : Delhi

..... vaishnav institute of technology and management (2012) 5 scc139 the supreme court set aside the judgments of this court and held; i) that once recognition has been granted by the regional committee to an institution, the council has to ensure that such recognized institution functions in accordance with the ncte act; ii) to achieve that objective, the council has to get inspection of the recognized institution done periodically (under section 13 of the ncte act) and if such institution is found wanting ..... , j1 this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeks, i) quashing of regulations 4&5 of the all india council for technical education (grant of approvals for the technical institutions) regulations, 2012 as ultra vires sections 10 & 11 of the all india council for technical education act, 1987 (aicte), as well as articles 14 and 19 of the constitution of india; ii) quashing of order dated 30.04.2014 of the respondent aicte; iii) a writ of mandamus directing ..... attention to the definition in regulation 2.5 defining approved institution as an institute approved by the respondent aicte and has contended that section 11 having used the word technical institution and not the word approved institution would thus include both, already approved institution as well as a new institution.16. ..... section 11 of the aicte act is pari materia to section 13 of the national council for teacher education act ..... national council for teacher education 180 (2011) dlt656 the matter finally .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2019 (HC)

B. Rudragouda vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... second, he submitted that the survey and demarcation report submitted by national institute of technology, karnataka (nitk) pursuant to the survey conducted in march, 2014 was flawed and not in accordance ..... before january 12, 2015, for grant of a mining lease for minerals not specified in the first schedule to the act; or (b) the central government has communicated the previous approval in writing before january 12, 2015, under sub-section (1) of section 5, for grant of a mining lease for minerals specified in part c of the first schedule to the act, shall submit a letter of compliance to the state government, of the conditions mentioned in the letter of intent or ..... prejudice the following shall remain eligible on and from the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015: (1), (a) xxxxx (b) xxxxx (c) where the central government has communicated previous approval as required under sub-section (1) of section 5 for grant of a mining lease, or if a letter of intent (by whatever name called) has been issued by the state government to grant a mining lease, before the ..... 2007, the central government issued a letter and accorded its prior approval under section 5(1) of the mmdr act ..... 2007, respondent no.2 (secretary (mines, ssi and textiles) commerce & industry department, state of karnataka) recommended the petitioner s application for grant of mining lease for prior approval of the central government under section 5(1) of the mmdr act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2019 (HC)

M/S p.m. Mines & Minerals Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... second, he submitted that the survey and demarcation report submitted by national institute of technology, karnataka (nitk) pursuant to the survey conducted in march, 2014 was flawed and not in accordance ..... before january 12, 2015, for grant of a mining lease for minerals not specified in the first schedule to the act; or (b) the central government has communicated the previous approval in writing before january 12, 2015, under sub-section (1) of section 5, for grant of a mining lease for minerals specified in part c of the first schedule to the act, shall submit a letter of compliance to the state government, of the conditions mentioned in the letter of intent or ..... prejudice the following shall remain eligible on and from the date of commencement of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) amendment act, 2015: (1), (a) xxxxx (b) xxxxx (c) where the central government has communicated previous approval as required under sub-section (1) of section 5 for grant of a mining lease, or if a letter of intent (by whatever name called) has been issued by the state government to grant a mining lease, before the ..... 2007, the central government issued a letter and accorded its prior approval under section 5(1) of the mmdr act ..... 2007, respondent no.2 (secretary (mines, ssi and textiles) commerce & industry department, state of karnataka) recommended the petitioner s application for grant of mining lease for prior approval of the central government under section 5(1) of the mmdr act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2015 (HC)

Axis Bank Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... original application (oa) no.108/2004 under section 19 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the rddbfi act ) had been instituted before the debts recovery tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the drt ) on 22.11.2004 by punjab national bank (the first respondent) impleading ..... a different handwriting appearing in the body of the cheque not being one which could have aroused suspicion in the minds of the officials of bank , it was observed, in the context of section 131, as under: section 131 makes it clear that when a banker receives from its customer a cheque crossed in its customer s behalf, the fact that the customer s title to the cheque is defective does not ..... of national institute of technology for the ..... defining the expression debt reads as under: debt" means any liability (inclusive of interest) which is claimed as due from any person by a bank or a financial institution or by a consortium of banks or financial institutions during the course of any business activity undertaken by the bank or the financial institution or the consortium under any law for the time being in force, in cash or otherwise, whether secured or unsecured, or assigned, or whether payable under a ..... it is clear from the definition of debt as appearing under the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 that only those claims can be made before the debts recovery tribunal where the due amount is a liability arising .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //