Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 59 of 1994 IN THE MATTER OF: KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Adarsh Kumar Aggarwal. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. AND CS (OS) No. 2293 of 1996 ADARSH KUMAR AGGARWAL .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Versus KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 28 05.2013 CA No. 2068 of 2012 in Co. Pet. No. 59 of 1994 CA No. 27 of 1997 & IA No. 12367 of 2012 in CS (OS) No. 2293 o1. The background to these applications is that the Board for Financial and Industrial Reconstruction (BIFR) made a reference to this Court under Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Spe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + In the matter of COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: Crl.A.193/2006 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .Appellant Versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMA & ORS. ..Respondents + CRL.M.A.1898/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHYAN MUNSHI ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1899/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHIVDAS YADAV ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1900/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus ANDLEEP SEHGAL ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1901/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus MANOJ KUMAR ..Respondent CRL.M.A.1898/2007 and connected Crl.M.A.s in CRL.A.193/06 Page 1 + CRL.M.A.1902/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus BALBIR SINGH ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1904/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus TARSEM LAL THHAPAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1906/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHANKAR MUKHIA ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1908/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus CHANDER...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
30 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1396/2011 M/S RITU MERCANTILES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. B.K. Sood, Advocate with Mr. Manharjit Singh and Mr. Manik Sood, Advocates. versus LEELAWATI ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.K. Jain and Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocates. Date of Decision:17. h May, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 9288/2011 in CS(OS) 1396/2011 1. Present injunction application has been filed in the suit for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell dated 03rd February, 2011 for purchase of 1/3rd share of defendant in agricultural land admeasuring 42 Bighas and 6 Biswas (14 Bighas and 2 Biswas) in village Jhatikara, New Delhi-110043 for a total consideration of Rs.5 crores. The admitted position is that as of date, the plaintiffs have paid to the defendant only Rs.50 lacs.2. It is stated that in December, 2010, one Mr. Prem Raj introduced the plaintiff No.2, director ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... reliance was placed in this behalf on section 2(d) of the designs act and the judgment of the supreme court in p. kasilingam vs p.s.g. college of technology air 199.sc 1395.12.4 the definition of design cannot be extended to common law rights or goodwill. the designs act confers rights in negative, that ..... extent of damages which could be claimed in an action for infringement and consequential relief of damages. both reasons, according to us, overlook the fundamental principle that in order to institute a suit, a right has not to be necessarily found in a statute enacted by a legislature. unless the statute expressly or by necessary implication prohibits the jurisdiction of a court ..... however, these statements of the court of customs and patent appeals must be compared with the dictum of the united states supreme court in kellogg co. v. national biscuit co. where justice brandeis appeared to say that the pillow-shaped shredded wheat biscuit fell into the public domain upon expiration of a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... statement of objects and reasons of the designs act, 2000 reads as follows: "since the enactment of the designs act, 1911 considerable progress has been made in the field of science and technology. the legal system of the protection of industrial designs requires to be made more efficient in order to ensure effective protection to registered designs. it is also required to promote ..... no. 384/2008 page no.4 of 94 provided further that no suit or any other proceeding for relief under this sub- section shall be instituted in any court below the court of district judge. (3) in any suit or any other proceeding for relief under sub- section (2), every ground on ..... be determined by each member state notwithstanding its broad wording, this is not attempting to create an entirely new type of copyright. what it is directed to is preventing national laws from prohibiting overlap between copyright and registered design rights. if, therefore, our domestic law had a provision which said any design which .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Syed Rafat Alam, Chairman The applicant, presently working as a District Education Officer/Principal, West-B, Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, is aggrieved with the Memo of Charges dated 9.09.2010 along with the imputation of charges of misconduct or misbehavior . The aforesaid Memo of Charges was issued and served on her vide letter dated 7.10.2010 for initiating proceeding under Rule 14 of CCS (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as 1965 Rules) for fraudulently securing appointment to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT for short) in the Directorate of Education against a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe (ST for short) and her further promotion to the post of Vice Principal and Principal (Annexure A-1). The applicant has, therefore, approached this Tribunal by filing this OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for the following relief(s):- (a) Quash and set aside the impugned charge-sheet with all co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Swatanter Kumar, (Chairperson) 1. The Legislature has vested the Central Government with the power to issue directions, in writing, to any person, officer or authority, in exercise of its powers and in performance of its functions under the provisions of Section 5 of the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short the Act). Section 5 has two distinct and significant features. Firstly, it opens with a non-obstante clause to give an overriding effect to such directions but such directions have to be subject to the provisions of the Act. Secondly, in explanation to Section 5, the scope of the power to issue directions has been described by use of inclusive language. It extends to issuance of directions even for closure, prohibition or regulation of any industry, operation or process. It further goes to the extent of issuing directions with regard to the stoppage or regulation of the supply of electricity or water or any other services. This wide power has been vested in the Central Go...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. 198 of 2008 MADHYA PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Advocate versus SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Gupta and Ms. Megha, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 03 05.2013 1. Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (MPSIDC) has filed this petition under Section 439 read with Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking the winding up of the Respondent, Som Distillers and Breweries Ltd. (SDBL), having its registered office at New Delhi.2. The background facts are that MPSIDC sanctioned and disbursed a sum of Rs. 1,00,00,000 by way of financial assistance in the form of Inter Corporate Deposit (ICD) to SDBL. In consideration thereof, SDBL executed a demand promissory note (DPN) and a corporate guarantee in favour of MSIDC. The due date for repayment was 21st Mar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 166/2011 Reserved on :20. h December, 2012 & 20th March, 20131 Date of Decision:3. d May, 2013 % RAEES-UZ-ZAMA AND ANR. ....Appellants Through Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed, Ms. Naghma Imtiaz and Mohd. Asad Khan, Advocates. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Mr. Sidharth Luthra, ASG with Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, Ms. Sarpreet Singh, Mr. Sachin Chopra, Ms. Supriya Juneja & Mr. Arjun Dewan, Advocates. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 299/2011 NOOR MOHD TANTRAY @ PEER BABA @ GULZAR AHMED BHAT @ UWAIS ...Appellant Through Mr. M.S. Khan, Ms. Pooja Uppal and Mr. Akram Khan, Advocates. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through Mr. Sidharth Luthra, ASG with Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, Ms. Sarpreet Singh, Mr. Sachin Chopra, Ms. Supriya Juneja & Mr. Arjun Dewan, Advocates. 1 The judgment in these appeals was originally reserved on 20.12.2012, but appeals were fixed for clarification and arguments on the question of consen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... constitutional and human rights of the people as well.43. delhi has the benefit of being the seat of the premier expert bodies on the several issues involved which would include the ministry of home affairs, intelligence bureau, the national intelligence agency, the national institute for disaster management and the central industrial security force. the govt. of nct of delhi would be required to implement the recommendations. the governments, delhi high court, delhi police, the representatives of the bar would require to be ..... attend their court hearings.34. courts for a large percentage of people, if not most people, are the last resort. we are still grappling with and struggling to overcome psychological, social, financial, technical, technological, geographical barriers to access to justice and a security regime which provides for an absolute entry point barrier; it results in an exclusion which is complete. such exclusion from the court is constitutionally impermissible. security .....
Tag this Judgment!