Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1366(SC); 2007(1)SCALE88
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Nagar Nigam Meerut is before us questioning the legality of a judgment and order dated 29th March, 2006 passed by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 53782 of 2004. Appellant-Corporation is a local authority constituted under Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporations Adhiniyam, 1959 (the Act). As a local authority, indisputably it has a large number of public duties and functions to perform; maintenance of slaughter house being one of them. Chapter XVI of the Act inter alia provides for regulation of slaughter houses. Sections 422 and 423 of the said Act, which are relevant for the purpose of this case are set out herein below:422. Municipal Commissioner's powers in respect of Corporation markets and slaughterhouse etc. - Subject to the provision of this Act and the rule and bye-laws framed thereunder the Municipal Commissioner shall have the power - (a) upon being authorized by the Corporation in that behalf, to co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4060 OF2009|MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND | | |RESEARCH CENTRE & ORS. |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. |.....RESPONDENT(S) | W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.4061 OF2009CIVIL APPEAL NO4062OF2009CIVIL APPEAL NO4063OF2009CIVIL APPEAL NO4064OF2009A N D CIVIL APPEAL NO4065OF2009JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.In all these appeals, validity and correctness of the common judgment dated May 15, 2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Bench at Jabalpur, has been questioned. The appellants in these appeals had filed writ petitions challenging the validity/vires of the provisions of the statute passed by the State Legislature, which is known as 'Niji Vyavasayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2007'). The appellants also challenged vires of Admissions Rules, 2008 (for short, 'Rules, 2008') and the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2005SC1975; (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN183; JT2005(3)SC48; (2005)3SCC16; (2005)2UPLBEC1615
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTORY REMARKS:2. The Appellants herein are residents of Santiniketan in the District of Birbhum of the State of West Bengal.3. Visva Bharati University (University) was conceived and established by Rabindranath Tagore, the great poet, story writer, song composer, playwright, essayist, painter, educational and Nobel Laureate, on 23rd December, 1921.4. An environment ambiance had all along been maintained in consonance with the ideals of Tagore and for which the same was established.THE ACT:5.The Parliament with a view to preserve and protect the uniqueness, tradition and special features of the said University, in exercise of its legislative power conferred on it under Entry 63, List I of the Seven Schedule of the Constitution of India enacted The Visva-Bharati Act, 1951 (the Act) declaring it to be an institution of national importance. The University was constituted as an unitary, teaching and residential University with a view to preserve the tra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2575 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 31892 of 2018) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANOTHER .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OM PRAKASH RAHI & OTHERS .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2576 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 31890 of 2018) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2577 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 32025 of 2018) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2578 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 31445 of 2018) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2579 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 31900 of 2018) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. Leave granted. 12. The present batch of appeals are directed against the self same judgment dated 31st July, 2018 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla which upheld the order passed by the Director of the National Institute of Technology without going through the process of selection of the teachers in the higher pay band of Rs. 3740067000 with AGP Rs.90...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1992SC422; (1991)3CompLJ367(SC); (1991)100CTR(SC)114; [1992]193ITR281(SC); JT1991(4)SC350; 1991(2)SCALE1014; 1992Supp(1)SCC732; [1991]Supp2SCR187
ORDERRanganathan, J.1. These appeals involve a common question and hence can be disposed of by a common order. The respondent assessees are steel rolling mills engaged in the manufacture of M.S. (Mild Steel) rods, bars or rounds. The question for consideration is whether they are entitled to a higher rate of development rebate specified in Section 33(1)(b)(B)(i)(a) and to relief under Section 80 (as it stood at the relevant time) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The answer to this question entirely turns on whether the assessees are engaged in the manufacture or production of any one or more of the articles or things specified in the relevant Schedule to the Act. They claim that the articles manufactured by them fall under item 1 of the list of articles and things set out in the relevant Schedule which reads:Iron and steel (Metal), ferro-alloys and special steels.2. This contention was rejected by Income-Tax Officer but has been accepted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribuna...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7243 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.4990 OF2018 THE BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) RADHA BALLABH HEALTH CARE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (P) LTD. .....RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1)2) 3) Leave granted. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna on November 21, 2017, whereby, the Letters Patent Appeal against an order passed by the learned Single Bench on September 19, 2016 was dismissed. The appellant published an advertisement on May 10, 2008 inviting applications for allotment of plot for health center in Lohia Nagar Housing Colony, Patna measuring 43000 sq. feet at the price of Rs.1,71,89,057/-. Rs.1,00,000/- was the earnest money. The 1 respondent applied for such plot along with the amount of earnest money. It was mentioned in the advertisement that upon receipt of more than one ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 435 OF2007SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE MEMBERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.5076 OF2007WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3003 OF2011JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.Civil Appeal No.435 of 2007 1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 7th November, 2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi, setting aside the finding returned by 1 the learned Single Judge of the High Court under judgment dated 26th October, 2004. The Division Bench has arrived at a conclusion that in terms of Section 12(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the Act 1992), a single registration with Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) is sufficient even if the stock broker has various memberships and functions from several stock exchanges and, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2804 of 2014 Raza Ahmad .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Ors ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1This appeal under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act 20101 arises from a judgment dated 2 August 2013 of the National Green Tribunal2, at its Central Zone Bench in Bhopal. 2 In April 2007, the seventh respondent, Steel Authority of India3, and Jayprakash Associates entered into a Memorandum of Association to establish a cement grinding unit of 2.2 MTPA capacity at Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. In pursuance of this goal, they set up the tenth respondent, Bhilai Jaypee Cement Limited. A parcel of land admeasuring 34.59 acres belonging to SAIL, falling in the villages of Hingna and Maroda at Bhilai in District Durg, was leased out to the tenth respondent for thirty years, based on a long-term lease dated 16 June 2007. The land use of this 1 NGT Act 2 NGT 3 SAIL 2 par...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9799 OF2010National Highways Authority of India . Appellant Vs. M/s ITD Cementation India Limited . Respondents WITH Civil Appeal No.9908/2011, Civil Appeal No.9909/2011 Civil Appeal No.2488/2012, Civil Appeal No.7066/2011 Civil Appeal No.3150/2012, Civil Appeal No.686/2013 Civil Appeal No.4069/2013, Civil Appeal No.5162/2012 Civil Appeal No.5661/2014, Civil Appeal No.10586/2014 Civil Appeal No.3913/15(@S.L.P. (C) No.10014/2013) Civil Appeal No.3914/15(@S.L.P. (C) No.10701/2013) Civil Appeal No.7373/2012 AND Civil Appeal No.6158/2013 JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.Leave granted in S.L.P (C) Nos. 10014 of 2013 and 10701 of 2013. A. Civil Appeal Nos. 9799 of 2010, 9908/2011, 9909/2011, 2488/2012, 7066/2011, 3150/2012, 686/2013, 4069/2013, 5162/2012 and 5661/2014, 10586/14, Civil Appeal @ from SLP 10014/2013 and Civil Appeal @ from SLP 10701 of 2013:2. All these appeals by special leave raise identical q...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2010SC787; 2009(57)BLJR3174; JT2009(14)SC451; 2009(14)SCALE139; (2010)1SCC756; 2009(10)LC4804(SC):2009AIRSCW7283:2009(6)LHSC3964
R.V. Raveendran, J.1. The appellants in these appeals are the employees of the first respondent-Bank - Ranchi Kshetriya Gramin Bank - now known as Jharkhand Gramin Bank. The appellants were working as clerks-cum-cashiers or equivalent posts in different branches of the first respondent-Bank. The Regional Rural Banks (Appointment and Promotion of Officers and other Employees) Rules, 1988 (for short `the Rules') made by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred under the Provincial Rural Banks Act, 1976 governed the appointment and promotion of employees of the Bank. Rule 5 provided that all vacancies shall be filled in accordance with the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Rules. Entry (5) of Second Schedule to the Rules related to filling of posts of Field Supervisors (subsequently merged with the post of officers). Clause (a) thereof provided that 50% of the posts shall be filled by promotion from amongst the confirmed senior and junior clerks-cum-cashiers or clerks...
Tag this Judgment!