Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... while allowing the appeal, the order dated 10.10.2002 is set aside and case remanded to state commission for complaint being decided afresh on merits after affording opportunity to the appellant to cross-examine the respondent and said two witnesses. ..... , deserves to be remanded to state commission for complaint being decided afresh on merits after affording opportunity to the appellant to cross examine the respondent and said two witnesses. ..... is not denied that the patient was about 55 years of age at the relevant time and, therefore, in the opinion of this commission, it was mandatory on the part of the opposite party-doctor to have conducted requisite blood and other tests in order to assess the fitness of the patient to undergo such a major ..... to cardiac complication, the important question which needs to be considered and answered is as to whether the opposite party committed any acts of commission or omission for which he can be held guilty of medical negligence and / or deficiency in service in the treatment afforded by him to ..... sushil kumari visited the opposite party at regular intervals and finally, as per the advice of the opposite party doctor, agreed to undergo the laparoscopic surgery for the removal of stones from the gall bladder which was scheduled for 15.09.1998 at the nursing home / hospital of opposite ..... manipulation made in the attendance register casts grave doubt on the plea of the opposite party ..... director, national heart institute (2004) 8 scc 56 / malay kumar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... alleged deficiency in service on the part of the respondents to the effect that the photocopying machine purchased by him from op 1 (after obtaining loan from the state scheduled castes and scheduled tribes development cooperative corporation) started malfunctioning soon after it was delivered. ..... 1300 of 1998, by which the state commission partly allowed the appeal of the respondents against the order dated 19.06.1998 of the district consumer disputes redressal forum, jalore (in short, the district forum) and directed them to pay to the petitioner/complainant rs.7,000/- within two months and, on failure to do so, also pay interest thereon @ 9% per annum ..... opportunities were given to the petitioner to do so, he failed to comply with the direction, constraining the learned counsel for the petitioner to state that the petitioner had refused to comply despite her request to him. ..... , the respondents specifically averred that the complainant did not bring the photocopying machine to jodhpur for repairs as directed by the district forum in its order dated 19.06.1998. ..... him to file a consumer complaint with the prayer for directions to the ops to either replace the defective machine or repair it and also pay compensation of rs.20,000/-. 3. ..... though notice for hearing had been sent to the petitioner/complainant and acknowledgement thereof had also been received, no one appeared on his ..... at the office of the district forum for the petitioner/complainant to appear, neither the petitioner nor his .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... the main grounds for the revision petitions are as follows: the state commission, u t chandigarh failed to consider the facts that the flight was scheduled to start from chandigarh at 05.30 p m on 29.12.2006. ..... the state commission allowed the appeal filed by the respondents and dismissed the complaint vide a common order dated 01.04.2008 by holding that the respondents are not at fault, without any regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and that too just on the basis of procured certificate and false affidavit submitted by the respondents by way of additional evidence. ..... since, the state commission have given a detailed and well-reasoned order which does not call for any interference nor does it suffer from any infirmity or erroneous exercise of jurisdiction or material irregularity. ..... mrs lili beri, director of the respondents intentionally, deliberately and knowingly filed a false affidavit by way of additional evidence on the basis of clever manipulation, procured certificate dated 15.12.2007 to cover up their misdeed and mislead the state commission, chandigarh and the same was considered as genuine evidence by the state commission and on the basis of above and false evidence, the state commission, chandigarh held that the respondents are not at fault and dismissed the complaint. 10. .....
Tag this Judgment!