Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68s information to competent authority Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 3 results (0.083 seconds)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sudarshan Kumar and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1412

..... the offences punishable under chapter iv and relating to coca plant, the opium poppy or cannabis plant and for this purpose references in those sections to narcotic drugs, or psychotropic substance, shall be construed as including references to coca plant, the opium poppy and cannabis plant.clearly, the above provisions lay down the power of ..... the state government, if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing, that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of ..... knowledge of information given by any person and taken in writing that any person has committed an offence punishable under chapter iv or that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance in respect of which any offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of .....

Schhida Nand and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

dev darshan sud, j (oral) 1. the appellants challenge their conviction under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ndps act). they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one year and fine of rs.1,000/- each for possession of charas weighing 350 grams ..... by pw9 asi sh. prem chand. accused sachhida nand was driving while accused meera sharma was seated. the police suspected that accused were in possession of some narcotic drugs/substances. from accused- sachhida nand one polythene envelop ext.p13 was recovered which concealed in his shirt and below the belt of his pant. on examination, it ..... chandubha jadeja v. state of gujarat [(2011) 1 scc 609] has settled this controversy. the constitution bench has held that requirement of section 50 of the ndps act is a mandatory requirement and the provision of section 50 must be very strictly construed. 5. from the perusal of the conclusion arrived at by this court in .....

Hardev Singh and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

surinder singh, j. (oral) heard and gone through the record. 2. the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable under section 15 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, in short the act , for allegedly transporting 1500 grams of poppy husk in maruti car no. pb-11 h-0427 and each of them was sentenced to .....

State of H.P Vs. Des Raj

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... other species of papaver, notified by the central government in the official gazette, within the meaning of sub-clause (b) of section 2(xvii) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act. hence, the submission made by the learned additional advocate general that the report, ex. pw-17/e, is different in its contents from the ..... which opium or any other phenanthrene alkaloid can be extracted and which the central government may have notified to be the opium poppy for the purposes of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. if it is so, the report of the chemical examiner, ex. pw-10/l, that the stuff contains contents of poppy husk ..... any other phenanthrene alkaloid can be extracted and which the central government may by notification in the official gazette declare to be opium poppy for the purposes of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. 9. in the present case, as is clear from the statement of the chemical examiner, recorded by us, the two tests .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Vajinder Pal

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... opium or any other phenanthrene alkaloid can be extracted and which the central government may have notified to be the opium poppy for the purposes of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. if it is so, the report of the chemical examiner, ex.pw -10/l, that the stuff contains contents of poppy husk ..... other phenanthrene alkaloid can be extracted and which the central government may by notification in the official gazette declare to the opium poppy for the purpose of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. 9. in the present case, as is clear from the statement of the chemical examiner, recorded by us, the two tests ..... delivered by the learned sessions judge, una, whereby he acquitted the accused of having committed an offence punishable under section 15 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act). 2. briefly stated the prosecution case is that on 12.4.2004, around 4.30 p.m. when constable ranjit singh was .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Simranjit Alias Sunny Son of Shri Ranbir ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... herein, who shall hereinafter be referred to as the accused and denoted as a-1 and a-2, respectively, for the offence under section 18 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short the ndps act). 2. briefly stated facts of the prosecution case are that during the night intervening 3/4.10.2004, a police party headed by pw-9 inspector ..... of which fir ex.pw-9/c was recorded. 20. since, as already observed, it was a case of chance recovery at a public place, neither section 50 of the ndps act nor provisions of section 100 cr.pc were applicable and as such the observations to the contrary made by the learned trial judge vide paras 9 and 10 of the .....

Hem Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... under each of the sections as follows:-section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act.rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of rs.5,000/-. in default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment ..... surinder singh, j (oral). the appellant has challenged the judgment of his conviction passed by the learned special judge, shimla under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 as also under section 61(1) (a) of the punjab excise act, 1914, whereby, he was sentenced to undergo the imprisonment ..... regard to the deterrent sentences contemplated and with a view that innocent persons are not harassed. therefore if an arrest or search contemplated under these provisions of ndps act has to be carried out, the same can be done only by competent and empowered magistrates or officers mentioned thereunder. 12. thus, it emerges that section .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Rajesh Dhiman and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... 23. the apex court again in jarnail singh vs. state of punjab(2011) 3 supreme court cases 521, in a case registered under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 have held that merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely ..... of the honble supreme court in ajmer singh vs. state of haryana (2010) 3 supreme court cases 746 in a case registered under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 have held that testimony of official witnesses, even in absence of its corroboration by independent evidence can form basis of conviction if ..... the police station. 16. it is always desirable that the independent witnesses are associated at the time of search, more particularly, in cases under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. however, there may be circumstances, in which it may be difficult due to geographical condition to associate independent witnesses. 17. in .....

Sat Pal and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary Ho ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... no.52 of 2010, decided on 2.4.2012/16.4.2012, whereby the appellants herein to be referred as the accused persons were sentenced under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, in short the act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of rs.40,000/- each with the .....

Bhumika Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... stuff were 717 grams, as such she was convicted for the whether reporters of the local papers are allowed to see the judgment? offence punishable under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, in short the act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of rs..70,000/-. in default of payment .....