Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68s information to competent authority Court: us supreme court Page 1 of about 83 results (0.104 seconds)

Apr 16 2015 (SC)

Control Print Ltd and Anr Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on which the high court thought it proper to reject the writ petition was that a fir has been filed and under section 63 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter for short 'the act') it is the criminal court which should be moved for release of the goods seized under ..... others, methyl ethyl ketone (mek) is one of the raw materials used by the first petitioner in its manufacturing process.2. under the provisions of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (regulation of controlled substances) order, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'the regulations') the petitioners had submitted an application in form 'k' for grant ..... is to inform you that you have imported 79.20 mt methyl ethyl ketone into india without a no objection certificate from the narcotics commissioner. this is in violation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (regulation of controlled substances) order, 2013.3. hence no objection certificate for import of 79.20 mt methyl ethyl ketone .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2016 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Mohanlal and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every court trying an offence under this act, shall treat the inventory, the photographs of [narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances]. and any list of samples drawn under sub-section (2) and certified by the magistrate, as primary evidence in respect ..... stood finally concluded at the trial, appeal, revision and further appeals, if any, before 29th may, 1989 the continued storage of drugs and narcotic drugs and psychotropic and controlled substances and conveyances is of no consequence not only because of the considerable lapse of time since the conclusion of the ..... constraints of proper storage space or any other relevant considerations, by notification published in the official gazette, specify such narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances or class of narcotic drugs or class of psychotropic substances which shall, as soon as may be after their seizure, be disposed of by such officer and in such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2009 (SC)

D. Ramakrishnan Vs. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC2404; 2009(240)ELT321(SC); JT2009(14)SC473; 2009(10)SCALE138; 2009AIRSCW4772:2009AIRSCW4228

..... mandates that no person shall produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or transship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders made thereunder and ..... , sale, purchase, transport, etc. of the contraband. chapter vi of the 1985 rules provides for import, export and transshipment of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. rule 53 contains general prohibition in terms whereof the import and export out of india of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances specified in schedule i appended thereto is prohibited. such prohibition, however, is subject to the other provisions of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2008 (SC)

Aslam Mohd. Merchant Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)KLT400; 2008(II)OLR(SC)393; 2008(10)SCALE383; 2008(2)LC855(SC); 2008AIRSCW4868; 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)Crimes122

..... brought on records.14. the relevant provisions of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976 (for short 'safema') and narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps) are in pari materia.15. contentions were raised that the show cause notice shows complete non-application of mind on the ..... conference at vienna in february, 1971 ; and (d) any other international convention, or protocol or other instrument amending an international convention, relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances which may be ratified or acceded to by india after the commencement of this act.8. section 68a of the act applies to persons specified ..... authority that acquisition of the property by them has nothing to do with the purported income derived by `mirchi' out of illicit trafficking of narcotic, drug and psychotropic substances.on behalf of the appellants, it was furthermore urged:(i) even a perusal of from the order passed by the competent authority, it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 2012 (FN)

Bh (Ap) and Another Vs. the Lord Advocate and Another

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... consideration. but those interests must be assessed in the context of this country's treaty obligations in the suppression of trade in narcotic drugs across international borders (un convention against illicit trading in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances 1988). there are good reasons too for looking to the place of the mischief as the place where the prosecution should ..... it was pointed out that a large number of witnesses would have to attend from the united states if the complete scale of the appellants' involvement in drug making activities there was to be placed before the court, whereas the number of witnesses who would need to travel for a trial in that country would ..... the appellants' activities was given by the crown prosecution service in 2006 following their move to scotland earlier that year. section 20 of the misuse of drugs act 1971 provides that a person commits an offence if in the united kingdom he assists in or induces the commission in any place outside the united .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2012 (FN)

In the Matter of Peacock

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... and the council of europe, to take measures necessary to ensure that the profits of those engaged in drug trafficking or other crimes are confiscated: see the united nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (19 december 1988); council of europe convention on laundering, search, seizure and confiscation of the proceeds ..... parliament's intention to expropriate them has been expressed in clear and unambiguous terms. the principle is in no doubt. but the statutory purpose of the drug trafficking act 1994 ("the 1994 act"), and similar statutes, could hardly have been made clearer. as lord steyn observed in relation to part vi ..... put beyond doubt by subsections 7 and 9. but presumably that is because section 15 is directed essentially to revising the assessment of the proceeds of drug trafficking and, but for these subsections, would not appear to involve any recalculation of realisable assets. sections 16 and 17 by contrast are directly concerned .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 2012 (FN)

Assange Vs. the Swedish Prosecution Authority

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... rise to surrender pursuant to a european arrest warrant: - participation in a criminal organisation, - terrorism, - trafficking in human beings, - sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, - illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, - illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives, - corruption, - fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the european communities within the meaning of the convention of 26 july 1995 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2012 (FN)

Perry and Others Vs. Serious Organised Crime Agency

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... has explained, poca is intended to fulfil certain international obligations of the united kingdom. these include, in particular, the obligations arising under the united nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (vienna, 20 december 1988), the convention on laundering, search, seizure and confiscation of the proceeds of crime (strasbourg, 8 november 1990), and the council framework decision of 26 ..... light of those instruments. for present purposes, the most significant of them are the vienna convention and the strasbourg convention. the vienna convention 103. the vienna convention is concerned with drugs offences. article 5 relates to confiscation, defined by article 1 as meaning the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or other competent authority. article 5(1) requires .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2006 (FN)

Gonzales Vs. Oregon

Court : US Supreme Court

..... narcotics drugs and the maintenance of records on such drugs are to be made by the attorney general ). post enactment congressional commentary on the csa s regulation of medical practice is also at odds with the attorney general s claimed authority to determine appropriate medical standards. in 1978, in preparation for ratification of the convention on psychotropic ..... 21 u. s. c. 823(g) (2000 ed. and supp. ii) (stating that the attorney general shall register practitioners who dispense drugs for narcotics treatment when the secretary has determined the applicant is qualified to treat addicts and the attorney general has concluded the applicant will comply with record keeping ..... attorney general for possible scheduling. shedding light on congress understanding of drug abuse, this requirement appears under the heading abuse potential. 21 u. s. c. 811(f). similarly, when congress prepared to implement the convention on psychotropic substances, it did so through the csa. 801a. the interpretive .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Bal Mukund and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1468; 2009CriLJ2407; JT2009(5)SC45; 2009(4)SCALE606; (2009)12SCC161; 2009(4)LC1769(SC):2009AIRSCW2604:2009(4)LHSC2390

..... for a day which was granted. he purported to have made another statement on 22.06.1998. on his production before the learned special judge under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short 'the act') on 23.06.1998, he was taken to judicial custody.8. respondent no. 3 immediately thereafter sent an ..... , viz., if the officer has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person which should be taken down in writing that any drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance in respect of which an offence punishable under the act has been committed, he is empowered to exercise his power enumerated in clauses ..... v. baldev singh : 1999crilj3672 , wherein it was held:28. this court cannot overlook the context in which the ndps act operates and particularly the factor of widespread illiteracy among persons subject to investigation for drug offences. it must be borne in mind that severer the punishment, greater has to be the care taken to see .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //