Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68b definitions Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 3 results (0.100 seconds)

Manjee Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(2)WLC405; 1996(1)WLN138

..... former enactment passed by parliament.15. however, it is made clear that personal use and sale of bhang is not an offence under rule 24 of rajasthan narcotic drugs and psychotropic rules, 1985. since in the present case the question of possession and sale of bhang is not involved, therefore, it is left open to be decided ..... l. report were not available to the accused applicant at that stage.3. perused the copy of charge-sheet furnished to accused applicant under section 8/20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act. 1985 (hereinafter referred as 'n.d.p.s. act') for clutivating cannabis plants of 'ganja'.4. it is true that the cannabis plant and ..... , collections, sale or possession of bhang is punishable under section 54 of the rajasthan excise act, 1950 (hereinafter referred as 'act no. 2 of 1950') wherein intoxicating drug has been defined under section 3(14) of the said act. it is also to be noticed that clutivation of any hemp plant (cannabis sativa) is also punishable under .....

Hari Singh Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... none of them are 9 applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case and they arise either out of the offences under the customs act or under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act and or under the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act.9. in the case in hand, the petitioner has been found indulging in ..... to the maintenance of public order . when such person is engaged in or is making preparation for engaging in any activities whether as a boot-legger or dangerous person or drug offender or immoral traffic offender or property grabber, which affect adversely or are likely to affect adversely the maintenance of public order. . 6. a perusal of the record shows that .....

Ranjeet Singh Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... pw- 7).who was incharge sho at the relevant point of time and was not authorised person to made search and thus the provisions of section 42 of the ndps act were violated and whole proceedings stand vitiated. he placed reliance upon the judgments delivered in the cases of criminal appeal no.513/2005 [state of rajasthan versus rajendra singh ..... registered against him. after investigation, the police filed charge-sheet against him. after hearing, the learned trial court framed charge for the offence under section 8/21 of the ndps act to which he denied and claimed trial. to substantiate the charges, the prosecution examined as many as 9 witnesses and exhibited documents. the {3} appellant-accused was examined ..... no.370 of 2006 under section 374(2) of cr.p.c.against the judgment and order dated 06.03.2006 passed by the learned special judge, ndps act cases, sr.ganganagar in criminal case no.2/2005, whereby the appellant-accused was convicted and sentenced for the offence under section 8/21 of the .....

Basanti Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... reached at the bus stand, chittorgarh, where a person having a bag in his hand was stopped and after giving his information and notice under section 50 of the ndps act, he was searched. on being searched, 9 packets containing opium, weighing 5.100 kg. was recovered. after taking samples, the packets and samples were seized and sealed ..... by the learned special judge, ndps cases, chittorgarh in sessions case no.25/2005 whereby he has been convicted for the offence under section 8/18 of the ndps act and was sentenced to undergo 10 years.rigorous imprisonment with fine of rs.1,00,000/-, in default whereof, to further undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment. {2 ..... the learned special judge, ndps cases, chittorgarh in sessions case no.25/2005 whereby he has been convicted and sentenced for the offence under section 8/18 of the ndps act. date of judgment ::: february 27, 2015 present hon'ble mr.justice banwari lal sharma mr.rs gill, for the appellant. mr.lr upadhyay, public prosecutor. by the .....

Mahavir Jain Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... under challan no.71 / sections 388, 420 ipc & 17, 18 ndps2506.1991 for act, police station, kotwali barmer the offence under sections 388, 420, 120b ipc and sections 17, 18 ndps act. 2 273 dated 12.10.1994 offence under challan no.208/ sections 451, 323, 341 ipc, police 29.12.1994 for station, kotwali barmer the offence under sections 147, 452 .....

Mahavir Jain Vs. State (Local Bodies)

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... under challan no.71 / sections 388, 420 ipc & 17, 18 ndps2506.1991 for act, police station, kotwali barmer the offence under sections 388, 420, 120b ipc and sections 17, 18 ndps act. 2 273 dated 12.10.1994 offence under challan no.208/ sections 451, 323, 341 ipc, police 29.12.1994 for station, kotwali barmer the offence under sections 147, 452 .....

Rafiq Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... .the petitioner has been arrested in connection with cr no.209/2013, police station khinvsar (nagaur) for the offences under sections 8/15, 8/25 and 8/29 of the ndps act. learned counsel for the petitioner while praying for bail submitted that no role is attributed to the present petitioner and he has no involvement with the recovery of the contraband .....

Daulat Singh @ Gattu and anr Vs. State of Raj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... two cases aforesaid should be adhered while examining the application seeking release on bail/suspension of sentence in the matters where the conviction is recorded for the offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1985 .). 2 the discussions made by learned single bench while making reference to the larger bench read as under .....

Ashok Kumar Gurjar and ors Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the applicant an opportunity of being heard, that he- (a) is a habitual criminal or a habitual drunkard; or (b) is a habitual addict to any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance within the meaning of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985); or sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3 .....

Surendra Singh Ratnu Vs. Raj. State Road Tran. Corpn. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the applicant an opportunity of being heard, that he- (a) is a habitual criminal or a habitual drunkard; or (b) is a habitual addict to any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance within the meaning of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985); or sbcwp no.6757/2013 panne singh & ors. vs. rsrtc & ors. along with 13 other connected matters judgment dt:3 .....