Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68b definitions Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 15 results (0.052 seconds)

Smt. Heena Kausar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... . 2 to 5 of the list of properties annexed to the show-cause notice should not be forfeited under the provisions of section 68-i of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985. reply was given by the petitioner to the said show-cause notice and after holding inquiry, competent authority was pleased to forfeit the ..... direction for setting aside the order of detention dated 02/09/1994 passed by respondent no.2 under section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988. 2. brief facts are as under:- 3. on 02/09/1993, a jeep which was parked at worli, mumbai was seized and ..... in respect of whom an order of detention has been made under the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988 (46 of 1988), or under the jammu and kashmir prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988: provided that such order of detention has not been revoked on the report of the .....

Union of India Vs. Ambalal Srilalji Ahir and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... passed by the trial court granting bail is per-se illegal and against the spirit of law, which seeks to prevent the offences relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance. taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, severity of punishment, the specific provisions prohibiting granting of bail, in view ..... commit such offence if granted bail. these are the stringent conditions in respect of grant of bail in respect of commercial quantity of the narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance. the trial court granted the bail holding that it was not commercial quantity of opium because the morphine contained in the total substance ..... all preparations containing more than 0.2 8per cent of morphine or containing any diacetylmorphine; "2(xviia) "commercial quantity", in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, means any quantity greater than the quantity specified by the central government by notification in the official gazette;" 2(xxiiia) "small quantity", in .....

Mohammed Phiroz Hanif Ansari and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR249

..... view to consolidate and amend the law relating to narcotic drugs, to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, to provide for the forfeiture of property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, to implement the provisions of the international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and for matters connected therewith. sections 1 to ..... n.d. vyas, j.1. both the appeals are directed against the judgement and order passed by the special judge appointed under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act) dated 30th september, 1993 in ndps special case no. 370 of 1991. the appellant muhamed in appeal no. 53 of 1994 (being original accused no. 3), appellant rashid in criminal .....

MainuddIn Kasim Mulla Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR626; 1991CriLJ1699; 1991(1)MhLj592

..... appellant guilty of the offences. he submitted that not only that the said evidence was weak but also that the statutory formalities prescribed under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 were not complied with. he submitted that in the circumstances stated above, the rejection of defence evidence had caused prejudice to ..... the appeal should be dismissed. 7. the conviction awarded by the learned sessions judge for offences punishable under sections 20(b) and 22 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 are obviously wrong on the basis of the plain averments of the prosecution. the prosecution case was that the appellant was found in ..... proved to be guilty of the offences of possession of opium and heroin. we wish to emphasize that hereafter, in every case under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act which is triable in the sessions court or in the court of additional sessions judge, adequate precaution must be taken to ensure that .....

Deepak Ghanshyam Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR574; (1989)1991BOMLR35; 1989MhLJ276

..... 1. this is an appeal by the appellant-accused who was convicted by the learned additional sessions judge, thane, in session case no. 605 of 1986 under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of rupees one lakh, ..... have got benefit under s. 27 of the act in respect of punishment. in fact, it was never his defence in the trial court that he was carrying narcotic drug or psychotropic substance for his personal consumption. therefore, the argument now advanced by mr. sangani is not available to him. the very fact that four packets were found in ..... the act. section 43 provides that any officer of any of the department mentioned in s. 42 may seize, in any public place or in transit, nay narcotic drug or psychotropic substance and detain and search any person whom he has a reason to believe to have committed an offence punishable under chap. iv of the act. therefore, .....

M/s. Auto Creaters Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... that no application under this sub-section shall be made in relation to goods to which section 123 applies or to goods in relation to which any offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 (61 of 1985) has been committed; provided also that no application under this sub-section shall be made for the interpretation of the classification of the .....

Under Water Services Company Limited and Others Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the appellate tribunal or any court. e. the said goods are not covered by the notification issued under section 123 of the customs act, 1962 nor any offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) has been committed f. the present application is not made for interpretation of the classification of the goods under the customs tariff act ..... that no application under this sub-section shall be made in relation to goods to which section 123 applies or to goods in relation to which any offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) has been committed: provided also that no application under this sub-section shall be made for the interpretation of the classification of the .....

Imran Shahid Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

..... out of crime no.ii56 of 2014 registered by kashimira police station for the offence punishable under sections 8(c), 20 and 22 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (in short, "the ndps act") on 29/09/2014, same are decided by the common judgment and order. 2. in the present crime, there are in all four ..... stalks. for want of such description, the description mentioned in the seizure panchnama would be too short to bring the case within the ambit of provisions of ndps act, and further observed that the legislature in its wisdom has specifically excluded seeds and leaves, and has specifically mentioned that cannabis means fruiting or flowering tops and ..... counsel for the applicant had also relied upon the order of this court having similar set of facts in a bail application moved under the provisions of ndps act, wherein this court has held that on failure to describe the contraband seized under the seizure panchnama, there is nothing to establish that whatever samples forwarded .....

Shaikh Zahid Mukhtar and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the burden on the accused to prove innocence, is not foreign to indian legal system. he relies on several enactments such as essential commodities act, narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, wild life protection act, foreign exchange regulation act and foreign exchange management act, food adulteration act, customs act, etc. where burden to ..... krishna janardhan bhat's case (supra). a statute itself may expressly place a pursuasive burden on the accused. for example, if contraband like narcotic drug or psychotropic substance is seized from the possession of any person and such possession and seizure are established, the burden of proving that such possession was ..... not an offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act lies on such person. if the person fails to account for such possession satisfactorily, section 54 of that act draws a presumption .....

Santosh Namdeo Bhukan Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Home Ministry)

Court : Mumbai

..... serious violation of prison discipline; (13) prisoners convicted for offences such as dacoity, terrorist crimes, kidnapping, smuggling including those convicted under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) and foreigner prisoners; (14) prisoners convicted for failure to give surety for maintaining peace or good behaviour ..... considered for release on furlough:- (13) prisoners convicted for offences such as dacoity, terrorist crimes, kidnapping, smuggling including those convicted under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) and foreigner prisoners; 5. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is convicted ..... the petitioner is that other prisoners also who had been convicted for the offences of kidnapping or for terrorist crime or under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act used to be earlier released on furlough, however, after the circular, they have not been granted furlough. the petitioner .....